How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Trace-free Euler characteristic of a stable-pair complex
Statement
Assume the inherited Axiom of Choice. Let be a nonsingular projective threefold over , let be a stable pair, and put in degrees . Write for the integral one-cycle with coefficient at each support component equal to the generic length of . Let denote the trace-free summand of its derived global endomorphism complex. Then This is an Euler-characteristic calculation; it does not assert the perfect-obstruction-theory axioms or construct an integral virtual class.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: as in the Statement, and the Axiom of Choice inherited from the algebraic-geometric suppliers.
Stable pairs and DT ideal-sheaf moduli on projective threefolds supplies the pair convention, purity, the one-cycle and the cohomological placement.
On regular , coherent and vector-bundle -groups agree, so the coherent sheaves used here have their perfect-complex classes. Chern character is additive and multiplicative, derived dual changes the sign of its odd-degree components, and . Vector-bundle K-theory equals coherent K-theory on regular quasi-projective schemes The Chern character and the Todd class
Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch for the projective maps to used below and for identifies the pushforward characters and the Euler characteristic with the degree of . Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch for projective morphisms
A reduced curve has a finite regular normalization. It is used here over , where its regular components are smooth. Normalization of a reduced curve is finite The choice assumption is The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
We first justify the character of the one-dimensional sheaf, including its multiplicities. A power of the radical ideal of the support annihilates , so its finite filtration by those powers has quotients on the reduced support. Remove finitely many intersections of distinct components; each quotient then has a generic rank on each integral support curve. Comparison with its finite normalization has kernel and cokernel supported at finitely many points. On a normalized smooth curve a coherent sheaf of generic rank , modulo its finite-support part, differs in its Grothendieck class from only by finite-support classes: choose a rational generic basis, clear its finitely many poles by an effective divisor, and compare the resulting rank- inclusion with its finite-length cokernel; the divisor exact sequence compares each twist with . Adding the filtration shows that in modulo finite-support classes, is the sum of the normalized curve structure-sheaf pushforwards with coefficients equal to its generic lengths. These coefficients are exactly .
Apply GRR to a normalization map . Its formula has no terms of codimension zero or one on the right, and its codimension-two term is . The same formula for a closed point has no term below codimension three. Since the Todd class starts with , step 1.1 proves and . Write with .
In , . Hence and . Multiplication and truncation above dimension three give . The identity and trace maps split the endomorphism complex: their composite on is multiplication by the virtual rank of , which is . Thus the trace-free derived endomorphism class has character , after subtracting the scalar summand. The trace statement can also be checked on any finite vector-bundle resolution: the evaluation trace of the identity is the alternating sum of its ranks.
GRR for now gives . Only can contribute because has codimension two on a threefold. Negating gives the claimed formula; its right-hand side is the integer degree of the integral cycle intersected with the Cartier class . No POT or virtual-cycle comparison is used in this computation.