How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite initial higher Sobolev norms give uniform Galerkin bounds on the common base interval
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Fix N≥1, ν≥0, a real s>5/2, and u0∈Hσs with Y0=∥u0∥Hs, and let T and uN:[0,T]→XN be as in The higher-order energy inequality and a common Galerkin lifespan with ∥uN(t)∥Hs≤2Y0. For every real m≥s with ∥u0∥Hm<+∞ define Bm:=∥u0∥Hme4CmY0T,Bm′:=νBm+3Cm−2Bm−12, where Cm is the commutator constant of The transport term is orthogonal to itself and the tame commutator estimate ∥[Λm,u⋅∇]u∥L2≤Cm∥u∥Hm∥u∥Hs and 3Cm−2 is the product constant of Discrete Young inequality, the Sobolev product bound, and the transport product bound on the torus at order m−2 (so that Bm′ is defined for m>7/2). For lower orders 0≤r<s set Br:=Bs; then ∥uN(t)∥Hr≤Br follows from monotonicity of the weights and the base bound. At any order where an initial norm is infinite, take Br=+∞ and the corresponding Br′=+∞ by convention, reading the estimate as an extended upper bound. Then for 0≤t≤T:
- ∥uN(t)∥Hm≤Bm for every real m≥s; in particular all bounds hold on the single interval [0,T] whose length depends only on Y0 and s, uniformly in N.
- ∥uN′(t)∥Hm−2≤Bm′ for every real m>7/2; in particular, for the integer orders of the main theorem (s≥4, m≥s) these are the uniform-in-N bounds on L∞(0,T;Hm) and L∞(0,T;Hm−2) of the Galerkin approximations.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Galerkin approximation uN of The Galerkin coefficient system: finite-dimensional invariance, local Lipschitz property, and the unique maximal approximation on the torus and the orbit estimate of The higher-order energy inequality and a common Galerkin lifespan with ∥uN(t)∥Hs≤2Y0: for all t∈[0,T], ∥uN(t)∥Hs≤2Y0 and 21dtd∥uN∥Hm2≤Cm∥uN∥Hs∥uN∥Hm2 for every m≥s.
∥PNv∥Hm≤∥v∥Hm for every m and every v∈Hm (Periodic vector Sobolev spaces on the three-torus, the weight family, and the Leray projection, The Galerkin coefficient system: finite-dimensional invariance, local Lipschitz property, and the unique maximal approximation on the torus); hence ∥uN(0)∥Hm=∥PNu0∥Hm≤∥u0∥Hm.
uN′=FN(uN)=−PNP((uN⋅∇)uN)+νΔuN, ∥Δv∥Hm−2≤∥v∥Hm and ∥(u⋅∇)u∥Hm−2≤3Cm−2∥u∥Hm−2∥u∥Hm−1≤3Cm−2∥u∥Hm−12 for m−2>3/2 (The Galerkin coefficient system: finite-dimensional invariance, local Lipschitz property, and the unique maximal approximation on the torus, Discrete Young inequality, the Sobolev product bound, and the transport product bound on the torus, claims 2 and 3).
t↦∥uN(t)∥Hm2 is differentiable with derivative 2⟨uN′,uN⟩Hm, and the function Z(t):=∥uN(t)∥Hm2≥0 satisfies: if Z′−λZ≤0 on [0,T] for a real λ, then Z(t)≤Z(0)eλt. Indeed (e−λtZ)′≤0 by the product rule and chain rule, and a function with nonpositive derivative is nonincreasing (The exponential function is smooth and (exp)′=exp, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c))g′(c), The exponential is positive and satisfies exp(−x)=1/exp(x)).
Proof
Given: The Galerkin approximation, its base estimate, and [F1]-[F3].
Fix m≥s with ∥u0∥Hm<∞ and let Z(t):=∥uN(t)∥Hm2. By the energy inequality of The higher-order energy inequality and a common Galerkin lifespan with ∥uN(t)∥Hs≤2Y0 and ∥uN(t)∥Hs≤2Y0, Z′(t)≤2Cm∥uN(t)∥HsZ(t)≤4CmY0Z(t) for 0≤t≤T.
By [F3] applied with λ=4CmY0, Z(t)≤Z(0)e4CmY0T; and Z(0)=∥PNu0∥Hm2≤∥u0∥Hm2 by [F1]. Taking square roots gives ∥uN(t)∥Hm≤∥u0∥Hme2CmY0T≤∥u0∥Hme4CmY0T=Bm for 0≤t≤T; since T and Y0 do not depend on N or m, this is claim 1.
For claim 2, use uN′=FN(uN) and [F2]: ∥uN′(t)∥Hm−2≤ν∥uN(t)∥Hm+3Cm−2∥uN(t)∥Hm−12≤νBm+3Cm−2Bm−12=Bm′ by step 2.1, valid for every m>7/2.
Remarks
- The point of the statement is the word common: the interval does not shrink when the order m is raised, because all the higher norms are controlled on the same base interval [0,T].
- For smooth u0 every Bm is finite, which is the situation of the main theorem; for u0∈Hs only the bounds with m=s are asserted, and they are what the compactness argument uses in the base norm.
Depends on
Periodic vector Sobolev spaces on the three-torus, the weight family, and the Leray projection
The higher-order energy inequality and a common Galerkin lifespan with ∥uN(t)∥Hs≤2Y0
The Galerkin coefficient system: finite-dimensional invariance, local Lipschitz property, and the unique maximal approximation on the torus
The transport term is orthogonal to itself and the tame commutator estimate ∥[Λm,u⋅∇]u∥L2≤Cm∥u∥Hm∥u∥Hs
Discrete Young inequality, the Sobolev product bound, and the transport product bound on the torus
The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)
The exponential function is smooth and (exp)′=exp
The exponential is positive and satisfies exp(−x)=1/exp(x)
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c))g′(c)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- E. Wiedemann (ed. J. Skipper), Lecture Notes: Navier-Stokes Equations (Universität Ulm, WS 2018/19), Theorem 4.16 and its proof (higher regularity: the induction giving uniform H^m bounds for the Galerkin approximations on the interval of the strong solution)
- A. J. Majda and A. L. Bertozzi, Vorticity and Incompressible Flow (CUP 2002), estimate (3.58)-(3.60) and the proof of Theorem 3.4 (uniform bounds for v_ε in L^∞H^m and for ∂_tv_ε in L^∞H^{m-2})