How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Linear clutching splits into spectral subbundles
Statement
Assume AC. Suppose is a linear clutching automorphism of for every and . A disk-automorphism homotopy and a constant change of hemisphere frame reduce it to . The generalized eigenspaces of with eigenvalues outside and inside the unit circle form complementary subbundles and . In the fixed convention,
so its -class is . The construction preserves direct sums.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, compact Hausdorff , and the displayed linear clutching family obtained after Polynomial clutching families stabilize to linear clutching.
A constant bundle automorphism extends over a hemisphere and hence can be absorbed by changing a clutching trivialization (Clutching construction for bundles over a suspension).
Winding number is invariant under homotopy through nonzero loops and is additive under products (Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers).
External product identifies with the pullback from and with the pullback of tensored by the Hopf line (External product in complex K-theory).
The Hopf convention fixes as and (Hopf-line calculation of K⁰(S²)).
AC is inherited from [F3] and [F4]; the finite-dimensional spectral construction itself makes no selections.
Proof
For , the fractional-linear map carries to itself, and there. Therefore is a homotopy through linear clutching automorphisms from . At , the coefficient is the original automorphism evaluated at . Openness of bundle automorphisms and compactness of give for which is invertible on every fiber.
Right multiplication of by the constant automorphism does not change the glued bundle by [F1]. Since scalar commutes with , it gives , where . Put . Then is invertible on , so has no eigenvalue of modulus one.
For one fiber , factor the characteristic polynomial of as , with the roots of the monic factors respectively outside and inside . Bézout polynomials for the relatively prime factors and Cayley–Hamilton give , , and . Both spaces are -invariant and have precisely the indicated generalized eigenvalues. This also proves uniqueness: any invariant splitting with the same spectral locations is annihilated by the corresponding factor and therefore equals these kernels.
These fiber splittings vary continuously. Around each root cluster choose a small circle disjoint from all roots. For a sufficiently small change of the polynomial, the straight-line change stays nonzero on each circle, so [F2] preserves the winding number of . Factoring into linear factors shows this winding is exactly the number of enclosed roots counted with multiplicity. Thus the inside and outside monic factors vary continuously in their coefficients. In a local frame choose vectors whose images under and form the bases in step 3.1; the same determinant remains nonzero nearby. Their images therefore give local frames for and , proving that the fiberwise spaces are complementary subbundles.
On , the family is invertible for , since every eigenvalue of has modulus greater than one; it deforms to the constant , which [F1] identifies with . On , stays invertible because all eigenvalues have modulus less than one; it deforms to . Hence [F1] gives .
Applying [F3] and the convention [F4] to step 5.1 gives the stated -class, hence a combination of and . For a block direct sum, the characteristic polynomial factors and the unique inside/outside invariant splitting in step 3.1 is the direct sum of the individual splittings, so the construction is additive. Rank zero gives two zero subbundles and the same formula.