How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Moments of the exponential law on the half-line
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), the choice hypothesis used by the change-of-variables lemma cited below. For every real and every integer the function is Lebesgue integrable on and
The assertion is an identity for the Lebesgue integral of a nonnegative Borel function; no probabilistic interpretation and no normalised density are asserted. In particular no statement is made about any other exponent, about complex , or about negative powers.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real , an integer , and the Axiom of Countable Choice.
Gamma integral. For every one has , the Euler integral being finite and positive for exactly these (The real Gamma function by Euler's integral).
Integer values. for every ( for every natural number ).
Change of variables. Let and let be a diffeomorphism between open subsets of . For every nonnegative Borel one has , with equality in (Borel change of variables from the compact-support formula and Radon uniqueness).
Proof
Given: The data of the statement and [F1]-[F3].
[Change of variables] Let be . Then is a diffeomorphism of open subsets of with and nonzero and constant, and its inverse is . The function is continuous, hence Borel, and nonnegative on . With one has , a nonnegative Borel function of .
[Gamma value] Taking in [F1], the integral is finite, and [F2] gives .
[Assembly] By [F3] applied to the diffeomorphism of step 1.1 and the function of that step, where the middle equality is the scalar rule for the nonnegative integral and the last equality is step 1.2; the value is finite, so is integrable on .
Remarks
- Only the half-line is used. The change of variables is applied to the open half-line , which is an open subset of ; no endpoint value of the integrand at or at is used, and the equality is an equality in .
- Scaling convention. The exponent in the denominator and the factorial in the numerator are fixed by the convention that the unscaled integral is ; in particular the mean of the normalised density is .
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, 1st edition 2009, Section 10.4 pp. 229-235 (evaluation of the Laguerre normalisation integrals of the Coulomb eigenfunctions, which reduce to the moments of this lemma)
- NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, §5.2 'Definitions' (the gamma function as an integral, and its values at positive integers: §5.2(i) and the recurrence of §5.5(i))