Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Self-adjoint operators with compact resolvent: eigenbasis and discrete spectrum

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let A be a self-adjoint operator on an infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space H (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Hilbert space, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis), let c∈R lie in the resolvent set of A, and assume that the resolvent Rc:=(A−c)−1∈B(H) is compact (Resolvent and spectrum of an unbounded operator, Compact linear operator). Then:

(a) H has a complete orthonormal family (en)n∈N of eigenvectors of A; writing μn for the eigenvalue of en, one has ∣μn∣→∞ (each eigenvalue repeated according to its finite multiplicity), and every eigenspace of A is finite dimensional;

(b) σ(A) consists exactly of the eigenvalues μn of A and has no other points, and the essential spectrum is empty: σess(A)=∅ (Discrete and essential spectrum of a self-adjoint operator); thus every spectral point of A is an isolated eigenvalue of finite multiplicity;

(c) for every z in the resolvent set of A the resolvent (A−z)−1 is compact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a self-adjoint operator A on a complex Hilbert space H; c∈ρ(A) with Rc=(A−c)−1 compact.

[F1]

A has a spectral PVM; for c∈ρ(A) the inverse Rc is bounded with ran⁡Rc=D(A), (A−c)Rc=IH and Rc(A−c)=ID(A) (Resolvent and spectrum of an unbounded operator, Discrete and essential spectrum of a self-adjoint operator); below H≠{0}.

[F2]

Compact self-adjoint operators: if T∈B(H) is compact and self-adjoint, then its nonzero eigenvalues are real, each nonzero eigenspace is finite dimensional, for every ε>0 only finitely many nonzero eigenvalues satisfy ∣λ∣≥ε, and the union of orthonormal bases of the nonzero eigenspaces with a Hilbert basis of ker⁡T is a Hilbert basis of H (Spectral theorem for compact self adjoint operators, including claim 1, Orthonormal eigenbasis for a compact self adjoint operator, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases). If ker⁡T={0}, the union of orthonormal bases of the nonzero eigenspaces is already a Hilbert basis.

[F3]

Diagonal operators: for a complete orthonormal family (wn) and arbitrary real numbers (νn) (including zero), the operator Tx=∑nνn⟨x,wn⟩wn with domain {x:∑nνn2∣⟨x,wn⟩∣2<∞} is self-adjoint with spectrum the closure of {νn}, and Twn=νnwn (Diagonal adjoint and graph-core lemma, Diagonal spectrum).

[F4]

Products and composites with compact operators are compact: K(H)⋅B(H)⊆K(H) and B(H)⋅K(H)⊆K(H) (Compositions with a compact operator are compact, Compact linear operator).

Proof

1.1F1F2

[Spectral decomposition of Rc] The resolvent Rc is compact by hypothesis and is self-adjoint: for x,y∈H, put u=Rcx and v=Rcy. Then u,v∈D(A) and y=(A−c)v, x=(A−c)u by [F1], so self-adjointness of A−c gives ⟨Rcx,y⟩=⟨u,(A−c)v⟩=⟨(A−c)u,v⟩=⟨x,Rcy⟩. It is injective: if Rcx=0, then x=(A−c)Rcx=0 by [F1]. By [F2], with ker⁡Rc={0}, the nonzero eigenspaces of Rc are finite dimensional with real nonzero eigenvalues, and the union of orthonormal bases of those eigenspaces is a complete orthonormal family (ei)i∈I of eigenvectors of Rc with eigenvalues νi≠0. The eigenvalue set is countable, being the union over k≥1 of the finite sets {ν:∣ν∣≥1/k} (Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming ACω, Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable), so I, a union of finitely many bases over a countable set of eigenvalues, is finite or countably infinite; it is infinite because a finite complete orthonormal family would be a finite spanning set of H (its span is finite dimensional, hence closed, and equals its closed span, A finite-dimensional normed subspace is closed), so that H would have a finite basis and be finite dimensional (Every spanning subset of a vector space contains a basis, Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis), contrary to hypothesis. Hence (ei)i∈I can be indexed as (en)n∈N, and then νn→0: for every ε>0 only finitely many indices n satisfy ∣νn∣≥ε by [F2].

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

[From Rc-eigenvectors to A-eigenvectors] For each n, en=νn−1Rcen lies in ran⁡Rc=D(A) by [F1], and (A−c)en=νn−1(A−c)Rcen=νn−1en, so Aen=(c+νn−1)en. Put μn:=c+νn−1. Since ∣νn∣→0 and νn≠0, ∣μn∣≥∣νn∣−1−∣c∣→∞. The map λ↦c+λ−1 is injective on R∖{0}, so distinct νn give distinct μn, and every eigenvector x of A with eigenvalue μ≠c satisfies Rcx=(μ−c)−1x, so x is an Rc-eigenvector; conversely every Rc-eigenvector is an A-eigenvector with eigenvalue c+ν−1≠c. Hence the eigenvalue set of A is {μn} with the same eigenspaces as those of Rc, the associated eigenvalues are exactly μn, and each eigenspace is finite dimensional; in particular the eigenspace of A at μn equals the Rc-eigenspace at νn.

3.1step 2.1F1F3algebra

[A is the diagonal operator in the basis (en)] We claim D(A)={x∈H:∑nμn2∣⟨x,en⟩∣2<∞} and Ax=∑nμn⟨x,en⟩en for x in this set. First let x∈D(A). Then Ax∈H and, by self-adjointness of A and step 2.1, ⟨Ax,en⟩=⟨x,Aen⟩=μn⟨x,en⟩ for every n; since (en) is a complete orthonormal family, Parseval gives ∑nμn2∣⟨x,en⟩∣2=∥Ax∥2<∞ and Ax=∑n⟨Ax,en⟩en=∑nμn⟨x,en⟩en. Conversely, let x∈H satisfy ∑nμn2∣⟨x,en⟩∣2<∞ and put y:=∑nμn⟨x,en⟩en∈H; the series converges because the coefficient sequence is square summable. We claim ⟨x,Aφ⟩=⟨y,φ⟩ for every φ∈D(A): the identity holds for every φ=em, because ⟨x,Aem⟩=μm⟨x,em⟩=⟨y,em⟩ by step 2.1 and the definition of y; moreover the span Z of the em is contained in D(A), and it is graph-norm dense in D(A): for x′∈D(A) the truncations xN′=∑n≤N⟨x′,en⟩en satisfy xN′→x′ and AxN′=∑n≤Nμn⟨x′,en⟩en→Ax′ by the first part of this step. Both sides of the claimed identity are continuous on (D(A),∥⋅∥A), since ∣⟨x,Aφ⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥φ∥A and ∣⟨y,φ⟩∣≤∥y∥ ∥φ∥A (Unbounded linear operators: domain, graph and extension); hence the identity extends from the dense subspace Z to all of D(A). Thus the functional φ↦⟨x,Aφ⟩ equals the bounded functional φ↦⟨y,φ⟩ on D(A), so x∈D(A∗)=D(A) with A∗x=y, and Ax=A∗x=y. This proves the claim.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F3

[Spectrum] By step 3.1, A is unitarily equivalent to the diagonal operator with entries μn, so [F3] gives σ(A)={μn:n∈N}‾={μn:n∈N}, the closure being the set itself because ∣μn∣→∞ (a sequence tending to infinity has no finite accumulation point). Together with step 2.1 this is (a) and the first half of (b): H has a complete orthonormal family of eigenvectors of A with ∣μn∣→∞, and the spectrum is exactly {μn}.

5.1step 2.1step 4.1

[Essential spectrum] Every μn is an isolated point of σ(A)={μn} (the set is discrete in R because ∣μn∣→∞), and its eigenspace is finite dimensional by step 2.1. Hence every μn belongs to the discrete spectrum in the sense of Discrete and essential spectrum of a self-adjoint operator, and σess(A)=σ(A)∖σd(A)=∅. This completes (b).

6.1F1F4algebra∎

[All resolvents are compact] Let z∈ρ(A) and let Rz:=(A−z)−1. Subtracting the inverse identities for A−z and A−c gives Rz−Rc=(z−c)RcRz, hence Rz=Rc[I+(z−c)Rz]. The factor I+(z−c)Rz is bounded, so [F4] makes Rz compact as a product with the compact Rc. This is (c).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources