How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Diagonal adjoint and graph-core lemma
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a complex Hilbert space (Hilbert space) with inner product linear in the first argument, let , where , be a complete orthonormal family of (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases), and let . Put
and
Then:
(a) is a well-defined, densely defined linear operator with domain (Unbounded linear operators: domain, graph and extension), and it is symmetric (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators);
(b) the series defining converges in for every , with , so is a linear operator with domain and ;
(c) (Adjoint of a densely defined operator), hence is closed and : is self-adjoint and , so is essentially self-adjoint and is its unique self-adjoint extension;
(d) is a core for (Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores): the finite truncations of satisfy and in as ;
(e) for , so is real and whenever for all ; and for every , so each is an eigenvalue of with eigenvector .
No assertion is made about a differential or multiplication realisation of : the lemma concerns only a specified complete orthonormal family and real eigenvalue sequence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a complex Hilbert space ; a complete orthonormal family ; real numbers ; the linear span ; the operators and displayed above.
; every finite subfamily of is linearly independent, so coefficients in a finite expansion in are unique; and for every the finite-subset net of partial sums converges to in , with (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family, clauses 3 and 4).
For a densely defined , a vector lies in exactly when is bounded on ; then is the unique with for all . The adjoint is closed, and holds exactly when for all ; a symmetric operator is closable with symmetric closure, and a self-adjoint operator has no proper symmetric extension and is closed (Adjoint of a densely defined operator, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, The adjoint is well defined, closed, and reverses inclusions).
and for a densely defined closable (Closability is equivalent to density of the adjoint domain).
and for finite (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors).
Proof
[Well-definedness and density] is the linear span of the family and is a linear subspace; by [F1] the coefficients in a finite expansion are unique, so is well defined, and it is linear and maps into . By [F1] the finite partial sums of the expansion of any converge to , so the span is dense in .
[Symmetry and the series for ] Let and lie in , with and by [F1]. Then because is real: is symmetric. For the sequence is square summable with , so its finite partial sums are Cauchy: by [F1]; by completeness of the series converges, its sum satisfies (the finite-subset net of squared norms has the same supremum), and is linear because coefficient extraction is linear. If moreover , then for all but finitely many and ; hence .
[] Let and . For each , , so . By [F1] applied to , , so ; and by [F1], so . Hence . Conversely let and ; then , so is the restriction to the dense subspace of the bounded functional and is therefore bounded on ; by [F2] and . Thus .
[ is self-adjoint] Let and . For the pairing is absolutely convergent by [F4] and . Testing gives , that is . By [F1], , so ; and then by [F1]. Hence ; the reverse inclusion was proved in step 1.3 as with , and directly: for and , by absolute convergence and realness of , so with . Therefore .
[Graph core] Let and . By [F1], , and by step 1.2, because the series converges. Thus in ; since was arbitrary, is dense in , that is, is a core for .
[Closure, essential self-adjointness and uniqueness] Since is symmetric, [F2] makes closable with symmetric closure , and [F3] gives . Since is the adjoint of a densely defined operator, is closed by [F2]; as , the least closed extension satisfies . Conversely, for step 1.2 supplies with and , so and . Hence , and is essentially self-adjoint because is self-adjoint. If is any self-adjoint extension of , then is closed and contains ; since is self-adjoint and with symmetric, [F2] forces . So is the unique self-adjoint extension of .
[Positivity and eigenvalues] For the series is absolutely convergent by [F4] and step 1.2: , and by continuity of the inner product in the first argument applied to the convergent series of step 1.2. Since the are real the value is real, and for all gives by [F1]. Finally directly from the definition of and [F1], so each is an eigenvalue of with eigenvector .
Depends on
Unbounded linear operators: domain, graph and extension
Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores
Adjoint of a densely defined operator
Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators
The adjoint is well defined, closed, and reverses inclusions
Closability is equivalent to density of the adjoint domain
Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases
Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family
Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors
Hilbert space
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()