Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Absolutely continuous representative of an L2 function with L2 weak derivative

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let −∞<a<b<∞ and let u∈H1(a,b) have weak derivative u′=Du (One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals). Then:

(a) there is exactly one representative u∗ of the class u that is continuous on [a,b], is absolutely continuous on [a,b], and satisfies u∗(x)−u∗(y)=∫yxu′(t) dtfor all x,y∈[a,b], where for x<y the right-hand side means −∫xyu′;

(b) for all x,y∈[a,b], ∣u∗(x)−u∗(y)∣≤∣x−y∣  ∥u′∥L2(a,b), so u∗ is uniformly continuous, and the assignment u↦u∗ is linear;

(c) if additionally u∈H2(a,b), then (u∗)′ is absolutely continuous on [a,b] and (u∗)′(x)−(u∗)′(y)=∫yxD2u for all x,y∈[a,b].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: reals a<b; a class u∈H1(a,b)⊆L2(a,b;C) with weak derivative u′∈L2(a,b;C).

[F1]

H1(a,b) and H2(a,b) are the spaces of One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals: u∈H1(a,b) means u∈L2(a,b;C) and the weak derivative u′=Du lies in L2(a,b;C); u∈H2(a,b) means u∈H1(a,b) and u′∈H1(a,b), with D2u=D(u′).

[F2]

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the ACL and absolutely continuous fundamental-theorem interfaces. For a nonempty open interval I⊆R, 1≤p≤∞ and u∈W1,p(I;C) with weak derivative Du, there is exactly one continuous representative u∗ that is locally absolutely continuous and satisfies u∗(x)−u∗(y)=∫yxDu; if I=(a,b) has finite endpoints, then Du∈L1(a,b), u∗ extends uniquely to an absolutely continuous function on [a,b], and u∗(x)=u∗(a)+∫axDu for every x∈[a,b] (One-dimensional W1,p functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives).

[F3]

For 1≤p<r<∞ on a finite-measure space, the real-valued finite-measure inclusion applied to ∣f∣ gives ∥f∥p≤μ(X)1/p−1/r∥f∥r also for complex f, by the modulus definition of complex Lp (Finite-measure Lr includes into Lp for p<r). The complex integral triangle inequality is ∣∫Ef∣≤∫E∣f∣ (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus). Applying the real-valued Holder inequality to ∣f∣ and 1 on a finite-measure set E gives ∫E∣f∣≤∥f∥L2(E)μ(E)1/2 (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).

[F4]

Under [F1], W1,2(a,b;C)=H1(a,b) as sets with the same weak derivative classes; both conditions are existence of an L2 weak derivative, so the identification is immediate from the definitions.

Proof

1.1F1F3F4given

[Reduction to the published corollary] The interval (a,b) has finite Lebesgue measure b−a, and 1≤2<∞, so [F3] gives u∈L2(a,b)⊆L1(a,b) and u′∈L2(a,b)⊆L1(a,b), while u′ is the L2 weak derivative of u by [F1]. By [F4] the class u lies in W1,2(a,b;C) with weak derivative u′.

2.1step 1.1F1F2givenalgebra

[Existence and uniqueness of the representative] Apply [F2] with I=(a,b) and p=2: there is exactly one representative u∗ of the class u that is continuous, locally absolutely continuous and satisfies the integral formula. Since I has finite endpoints, [F2] gives u′∈L1(a,b), the unique extension of u∗ to an absolutely continuous function on [a,b], and the formula for all x,y∈[a,b]; the assignment u↦u∗ is linear because the weak derivative and the integral are linear (One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals records additivity of the weak derivative). This proves (a).

3.1step 2.1F3algebra

[Holder modulus] Let x,y∈[a,b] with x≤y. If x=y, both sides are zero. If x<y, apply the complex integral triangle inequality in [F3] and then real Holder to ∣u′∣ and 1 on (x,y), whose measure is y−x, to obtain ∣u∗(x)−u∗(y)∣=∣∫xyu′∣≤∫xy∣u′∣≤∥u′∥L2(x,y)y−x≤∥u′∥L2(a,b)y−x; the case x>y follows by exchanging x and y. This is (b).

4.1step 2.1F1F2algebra∎

[Second-order representative] If additionally u∈H2(a,b), then u′∈H1(a,b) with weak derivative D2u∈L2(a,b) by [F1]. Applying the already proved part (a) with u′ in place of u supplies a continuous representative w of the class u′, absolutely continuous on [a,b], with w(x)−w(y)=∫yxD2u for all x,y∈[a,b]. The a.e. derivative of u∗ equals the class u′, so it equals w almost everywhere. The fundamental theorem for absolutely continuous functions therefore gives u∗(x)=u∗(a)+∫axw(t) dt for every x∈[a,b]. Since w is continuous, this identity makes u∗ continuously differentiable and gives (u∗)′(x)=w(x) at every x∈[a,b]. Thus (u∗)′ is absolutely continuous and has the displayed difference formula, proving (c).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources