Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalized area integral equals the degree

Statement

Set T2π2:=R2/(2πZ)2 with its quotient smooth structure and orientation induced by dk1∧dk2. Orient the unit sphere S2⊂R3 outward and let ωS2 be its normalized area form

ωS2:=14π(x dy∧dz+y dz∧dx+z dx∧dy)∣S2,

so that ∫S2ωS2=1. For every smooth map n:T2π2→S2, its integral degree satisfies

∫T2π2n∗ωS2=deg⁡(n)∈Z.

Here degree is the integer determined by n∗[T2π2]=deg⁡(n)[S2] in integral homology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Axiom of Choice, Countable Choice, and a smooth map between the stated oriented closed surfaces.

[A1]

Axiom of Choice is the principle in The Axiom of Choice, assumed by the top-form pairing supplier.

[A2]

Countable Choice is the assumption in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) and in the de Rham isomorphism The de Rham theorem.

[F1]

Degree of a map between oriented closed manifolds defines deg⁡(n) by the induced map on integral fundamental classes.

[F2]

Fundamental class of a compact oriented manifold supplies the orientation classes on both closed surfaces.

[F3]

The de Rham theorem makes the de Rham-to-singular-cohomology comparison natural for smooth maps.

[F5]

Top de Rham integration equals fundamental-class evaluation identifies integration of a top form with evaluation of its de Rham class on the real fundamental class.

[F6]

The singular chain complex and singular homology defines finite singular chains with coefficients and their boundaries; The induced singular chain map of a continuous map sends a simplex to its postcomposition; Singular chains and singular homology are covariantly functorial gives the induced map on homology.

[F7]

Local real-chain evaluation used here: for a space X, Cn(X;R) is the real vector space of finite formal sums of singular n-simplices with the real-linear singular boundary ∂. The identification in Singular cochain complex with coefficients gives Cn(X;R)=Hom⁡R(Cn(X;R),R). For a real cocycle φ and real cycle c, define ⟨[φ],[c]⟩R:=φ(c). This is the real-bilinear extension mentioned in Kronecker evaluation pairing; the cochain pullback representative is given by Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial, and the pairing's descent and naturality are proved in step 1.1 below.

Proof

Given: [A1], [A2], [F1]–[F7], and n as in the statement.

1.1F4F6F7algebra

If φ′=φ+δψ is a second representative of the same real cohomology class and c′=c+∂b a second representative of the same real homology class, then φ′(c′)=φ(c)+φ(∂b)+(δψ)(c)+(δψ)(∂b)=φ(c): the three additional terms vanish respectively by δφ=0, ∂c=0, and ∂2=0. Thus the real evaluation in [F7], the real-bilinear version of the Kronecker pairing [F4], is independent of representatives. For every continuous f:X→Y, the chain-level formulas f∗φ=φ∘f# and f∗c=f#c give (f∗φ)(c)=φ(f#c), so ⟨f∗[φ],[c]⟩R=⟨[φ],f∗[c]⟩R. Linearity of φ and c makes the pairing real-bilinear.

1.2givenalgebra

In spherical coordinates x=sin⁡θcos⁡ϕ, y=sin⁡θsin⁡ϕ, z=cos⁡θ, the unnormalized displayed two-form is sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ. Integrating for 0≤θ≤π and 0≤ϕ≤2π gives 4π, so ωS2 is a smooth closed form with integral one; its displayed ambient expression shows it extends smoothly across the coordinate poles.

2.1A1A2F3F5F7step 1.1algebra

Let J be the natural comparison in [F3]. By [F5] and the real evaluation defined in [F7], ∫T2π2n∗ωS2=⟨J([n∗ωS2]),[T2π2]R⟩R. Naturality of J and the real-chain pairing proved in step 1.1 gives ∫T2π2n∗ωS2=⟨J([ωS2]),n∗[T2π2]R⟩R.

3.1F1F2F5F6F7step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

By [F1], n∗[T2π2]Z=deg⁡(n)[S2]Z. The coefficient map ι:C∙(X;Z)→C∙(X;R) sends each finite sum ∑jajσj to ∑jajσj with the same coefficients viewed in R. It commutes with boundaries because [F6] defines the singular boundary as an integer linear combination of faces and ι is additive; it commutes with n# because [F6] postcomposes each simplex without changing its coefficient. Hence it induces a coefficient-change map on homology and carries each integral fundamental class to its real fundamental class: it sends the positive local orientation generator 1 to 1, so uniqueness of the class with those local restrictions in [F2] identifies the image. Applying ι to the degree equation gives n∗[T2π2]R=deg⁡(n)[S2]R. By the real bilinearity in [F7] and steps 2.1, ∫T2π2n∗ωS2=deg⁡(n)⟨J([ωS2]),[S2]R⟩R=deg⁡(n)∫S2ωS2=deg⁡(n) by [F5] and step 1.2.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources