Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Plancherel identity for the scaled semiclassical Fourier transform

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let d≥1, ϵ>0, and define Fϵ on S(Rd) by Schwartz Weyl quantization and Wigner distributions. It extends uniquely to a unitary operator on L2(Rd).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, d≥1, and ϵ>0.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

With negative-sign 2π normalization, the Fourier transform F2u(η)=∫e−2πix⋅ηu(x) dx on Schwartz space extends uniquely to a surjective isometry of L2 (Plancherel theorem).

[F2]

If T:U→V is a C1 diffeomorphism of open Euclidean sets, then ∫Vf(y)dy=∫Uf(T(x))∣det⁡DT(x)∣dx for nonnegative Lebesgue-measurable f (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F3]

The scaled transform on Schwartz space is exactly (Fϵu)(ξ)=(2πϵ)−d/2(F2u)(ξ/(2πϵ)), using the definition in Schwartz Weyl quantization and Wigner distributions.

Proof

Given: The data of the Statement and [A1], [F1]–[F3].

1.1givenA1F2algebra

Put c=2πϵ>0 and define Dcg(ξ)=c−d/2g(ξ/c) on L2(Rd). A null set is sent to a null set by the same change-of-variables theorem [F2], so this definition is independent of the representative of g. Apply [F2] to T(η)=cη, whose Jacobian determinant is cd, and to the nonnegative function f(ξ)=∣g(ξ/c)∣2. This gives ∥Dcg∥22=c−d∫Rd∣g(ξ/c)∣2 dξ=c−dcd∫Rd∣g(η)∣2 dη=∥g∥22. The inverse is D1/c, as direct substitution shows, so Dc is unitary.

2.1step 1.1F1F3algebra∎

By [F3], Fϵu=DcF2u for every u∈S. Both factors extend unitarily by step 1.1 and [F1], so their composition is a unitary extension to L2. If G were another continuous extension, then Dc−1G would be a continuous extension of F2; uniqueness in [F1] gives Dc−1G=F2, hence G=DcF2.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources