Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dirac Fock covariance, vacuum cyclicity and spectrum

Statement

Assume Countable Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) and the mathematical free Dirac data of Dirac Clifford matrices and energy projections, Dirac matrix identities and orthogonal energy projections, and Smeared free Dirac CAR fields and graded locality. Let G=R4⋊SO+(1,3) act by x↦a+Λx, with product (a2,Λ2)(a1,Λ1)=(a2+Λ2a1,Λ2Λ1). Let G~ be the subgroup of triples (a,Λ,S) generated by translations (a,I,I) and the explicit rotation/boost triples (0,Rn(θ),SR(θ)) and (0,Bn(χ),SB(χ)) of Dirac matrix identities and orthogonal energy projections, with product (a2,Λ2,S2)(a1,Λ1,S1)=(a2+Λ2a1,Λ2Λ1,S2S1) and the subspace topology from R4×M4(R)×GL(4,C). Its projection onto G is surjective by Proper orthochronous Lorentz maps factor into a boost and a rotation. For g~=(a,Λ,S) define the spinor test pullback τg~F(x)=(S−1)†F(Λ−1(x−a)). The fermionic Fock space of Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions carries a strongly continuous unitary representation U of G~ such that U(g~)Ψ(F)U(g~)−1=Ψ(τg~F). Let ADgr be the algebra generated by all bounded Ψ(F) and Ψ(F)† for Schwartz spinor tests F. The vacuum Ω is invariant and cyclic for ADgr. A 2π spatial spin rotation acts as (−1)N on the n-particle sector with value (−1)n; a 4π rotation acts as the identity. The translation generators and joint spectral measure are those of Fermionic Dirac translation generators and positive spectrum, so the joint spectrum is contained in the closed future cone, the zero-energy eigenspace is CΩ, and for μ>0 the nonvacuum energy has gap at least μ. The first-quantized hD has both signs of energy; this Fock-space generator is a different operator on a different Hilbert space. No general spin-statistics theorem or local cyclicity claim is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The fixed spinor test convention ∫F†Ψ, the shell phase p∘x=ωx0−k⋅x, explicit matrix lifts, proper orthochronous Lorentz geometry, and the actual draft supplier interfaces recorded below.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the choice strength assumed for the completed Fock spaces. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

The Clifford matrices, hD, P±, particle and conjugate negative-energy subspaces, and the second-variable-linear pairing are those of Dirac Clifford matrices and energy projections. By Dirac matrix identities and orthogonal energy projections, the matrix fields P± are bounded complementary orthogonal projections and their ranges H± are closed separable Hilbert subspaces.

[F2]

The explicit SR,SB obey SΓ(p)S−1=Γ(Λp) and SβS†=β; each proper orthochronous Λ factors into one boost and one rotation. Dirac matrix identities and orthogonal energy projections Proper orthochronous Lorentz maps factor into a boost and a rotation

[F3]

The future mass shell is p=(ω(k),k) with dνμ=d3k/((2π)32ω), and this measure is invariant under every proper orthochronous Lorentz map. Scalar future mass shell, invariant measure and test restriction Local finiteness and Lorentz invariance of the scalar shell measure

[F4]

The free Dirac field is the bounded smeared CAR field defined by Ψ(F)=c(P+uF)+c†(P−uF‾); F↦uF is continuous from Schwartz space to HD, and its separate positive and negative kernels are the Fourier distributions C+ and C− displayed there, with tested pairings ⟨P+uF,P+uG⟩ and ⟨P−uF,P−uG⟩. Smeared free Dirac CAR fields and graded locality

[F5]

The antisymmetric Fock sectors, finite-particle domain, creation formulas, and CAR relations use the conventions of Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions and Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains. By Dirac matrix identities and orthogonal energy projections, H± are separable, so their finite direct sum K=H+⊕H−‾ is separable (take pairs from countable dense sets); with Countable Choice [A1], the hypotheses of the CAR supplier hold for H=K.

[F6]

Smooth compactly supported vector functions are dense in L2 on an open Euclidean set, componentwise. Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L2

[F7]

The exact fermionic translation phases, maximal generator domains, joint PVM, forward-cone support, vacuum eigenspace and mass gap are established in Fermionic Dirac translation generators and positive spectrum.

[F8]

In the fixed inertial coordinates of Oriented time-oriented affine Minkowski space (the spacetime primitives) and Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model, proper orthochronous Lorentz matrices satisfy ΛTη0Λ=η0, have determinant +1, and preserve the chosen future cone, as defined in Linear and affine Lorentz maps, and the Lorentz group. The matrix group SO+(1,3) is closed under products and inverses by Lorentz maps are isomorphisms of determinant ±1 that preserve causal character and permute the cones; the Lorentz sets are groups.

[F9]

The quarter-turn values give cos⁡π=−1, sin⁡π=0, cos⁡2π=1, and sin⁡2π=0. Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4F8algebraconstruct

For translations the identities SΓ(p)S−1=Γ(Λp) and SβS†=β hold because S=I and Λ=I. They hold for each explicit rotation and boost generator by [F2]. They are preserved under products: if they hold for (Λ1,S1) and (Λ2,S2), then (S2S1)Γ(p)(S2S1)−1=Γ(Λ2Λ1p) and (S2S1)β(S2S1)†=β. They are also preserved under inverses, since S−1Γ(r)S=Γ(Λ−1r) follows by setting p=Λ−1r in the first identity, and S−1βS−†=β follows by multiplying the second identity by S−1 and S−†. Thus both identities hold for every element of the subgroup G~ generated by the stated triples. Now for p=(ω,k) the projection identity in [F1] gives P+(k)β=(Γ(p)+μ)/(2ω). For q=(ω,−k) it gives P−(k)β=(Γ(q)−μ)/(2ω). Thus, using dνμ=d3k/((2π)32ω), the separate kernels in [F4] are C+(z)=∫(Γ(p)+μ)βe−ip∘z dνμ(p),C−(z)=∫(Γ(q)−μ)βe+iq∘z dνμ(q), where p∘z=p0z0−p⋅z and both p,q range over the future mass shell. The matrix relations now established for every g~∈G~, together with S−1β=βS†, give S(Γ(p)±μ)βS†=(Γ(Λp)±μ)β. In each shell integral, change variables r=Λp (or r=Λq); invariance of dνμ [F3] and (Λp)∘z=p∘(Λ−1z) show C±(Λz)=SC±(z)S†. The coefficients grow at most linearly on the shell, so these Fourier integrals define tempered distributions and their pairings with Schwartz tests converge.

2.1F3F4F8step 1.1algebra

For F,G∈S(R4;C4), [F4] identifies ⟨P+uF,P+uG⟩ and ⟨P−uF,P−uG⟩ with the respective kernel pairings ∫F(x)†C±(x−y)G(y) d4x d4y. Set F′=τg~F and G′=τg~G. In each pairing, the spin factors are S−1 and S−†; changing variables x=a+Λx′, y=a+Λy′ has unit Jacobian, cancels the translation in x−y, and the kernel identity of step 1.1 cancels both spin factors. Hence both polarized one-particle pairings are preserved, and the maps P±uF↦P±uF′ are well-defined isometries on their test-generated subspaces. Applying the inverse group element proves they are onto after completion. For the conjugate negative-energy sector, conjugating the same preserved pairing and reversing its arguments gives the corresponding isometry on H−‾.

2.2F1F4F6step 1.1construct

The test-generated subspaces are dense. For u∈Cc∞(R3∖{0};C4), P±u is smooth and compactly supported away from the massless apex; such projected vectors are dense in H± by [F1] and [F6], since removing the single point does not change an L2 class. Choose g∈Cc∞(R) with ∫g(t)dt=1 and set F^(t,k)=g(t)WD(−t,k)u(k). This is smooth and compactly supported in (t,k); its inverse spatial Fourier transform is Schwartz by repeated integration by parts. The definition in [F4] then gives uF=u, and hence P±uF=P±u.

3.1A1F1F4F5F8step 2.1step 2.2algebra

By steps 2.1 and 2.2 the particle and conjugate antiparticle test maps extend to unitaries on H+ and H−‾. Their direct sum T(g~) is unitary. Define U(g~)=⨁n≥0T(g~)⊗an on the antisymmetric Fock sectors. Each tensor power is unitary by its isometric action on elementary tensors and inverse tensor power; it commutes with the signed permutation average and therefore restricts to a unitary on the antisymmetric sector. The direct sum is unitary and fixes Ω. On elementary wedge tensors the insertion/contraction formulas of [F5] give Uc†(h)U−1=c†(Th) and Uc(h)U−1=c(Th); density extends these identities to the finite-particle domain. Thus U(g~)Ψ(F)U(g~)−1=Ψ(τg~F). Direct substitution in the affine and spinor formulas gives τg~2τg~1=τg~2g~1: the coordinate argument is (Λ2Λ1)−1(x−a2−Λ2a1) and the matrix factor is (S2S1)−†=S2−†S1−†. By [F8] the Lorentz factors compose within SO+(1,3); by the definition of G~ its triples are closed under this product. Hence T and its Fock lift U obey the same product law and U is a representation.

4.1F4F5step 2.2step 3.1algebra

The map g~↦τg~F is continuous in Schwartz seminorms for each F, since it is composition with affine maps and finite matrices whose entries vary continuously. By the continuous test estimate of [F4], the one-particle representation is continuous on the dense test-generated subspaces of step 2.2; its operators have norm one, so approximation extends strong continuity to all one-particle vectors. On an elementary n-tensor, the difference of T(g)⊗n and T(g0)⊗n is a sum of n terms, each bounded by the norm of one factor difference times the norms of unchanged factors. It tends to zero as g→g0. Density and the unit norm bound extend this to each completed antisymmetric sector; finite-sector truncation then extends strong continuity to their direct sum.

4.2F1F4F5step 2.2step 3.1algebra

By step 2.2 the ranges of F↦P+uF and F↦P−uF‾ are dense in H+ and H−‾, respectively. Moreover, Ψ(F)†Ω=c†(P+uF)Ω and Ψ(F)Ω=c†(P−uF‾)Ω, so their created one-particle components range densely over both summands. For any ordered list of n such fields or adjoints, the all-creation term in their product on Ω is the wedge of their n creation components. Expand the product into creation and annihilation terms and use the CAR to move every annihilator to the right: a term with a remaining annihilator kills Ω, while each contraction leaves a product with at most n−2 creation factors. By induction, those lower-degree wedge vectors are in the polynomial orbit span, so subtracting them isolates the desired degree-n wedge. The degree-zero base also lies in the orbit span: step 2.2 gives a test F with uF≠0, and the CAR formula of [F4] gives {Ψ(F),Ψ(F)†}=∥uF∥2I, hence I belongs to the generated algebra. Wedges of vectors from the dense one-particle ranges are dense in each antisymmetric sector by the Hilbert tensor completion, and finite-sector truncations are dense in Fock space. Hence Ω is cyclic for the global graded field algebra.

5.1F1F2F7F9step 3.1algebra∎

For a pure translation, F(⋅−a)^(t,k)=χ(−k⋅a)F^(t−a0,k), so uF(⋅−a)=WD(a0,k)χ(−k⋅a)uF. On H+ this is the phase χ(ωa0−k⋅a); after conjugation on H−‾ it is χ(ωa0+k⋅a). Thus the induced Fock translations are precisely those of [F7], whose joint spectrum is in the forward cone, whose zero-energy eigenspace is CΩ, and whose positive-μ gap is at least μ. By [F9], SR(2π)=−I4 and SR(4π)=I4; hence a 2π rotation acts as −I on each one-particle summand and (−1)n on sector n, while a 4π rotation is the identity. The first-quantized hD has eigenvalues ±ω, while the Fock translation time generator in [F7] multiplies both particle and antiparticle excitations by +ω; their domains and Hilbert spaces differ.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources