Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lorenz auxiliary subsidiary null quotient

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and use HT from Positive transverse photon one-particle space. On K=L2(R3,d3k;C4) define [ϵ,δ]η=∫R3ϵ(k)†η δ(k) d3k,η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1). For k≠0, let n=k/∣k∣ and set K0={ϵ∈K:−ϵ0+n⋅ϵ=0 a.e.},Tϵ=ϵ−nϵ0. Then K0 is closed, T:K0→HT is bounded and onto, and [ϵ,δ]η=⟨Tϵ,Tδ⟩2(ϵ,δ∈K0). Its radical (the vectors pairing to zero with all of K0) is N=ker⁡T={b(k)(1,n(k)):b∈L2(R3)}. Consequently K0/N with the induced form is a positive Hilbert space isometric to HT. The form on the four-component auxiliary space is indefinite; only the subsidiary quotient is the positive physical one-particle space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and the transverse Hilbert space and projector of Positive transverse photon one-particle space.

[A1]
[F1]

PT(k)=I−nnT is an orthogonal projection with closed range n⊥ for almost every k≠0. Positive transverse photon one-particle space

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1], and the componentwise indefinite form in the statement.

1.1A1F1givenalgebra

The map Q:K→L2(R3) defined by Qϵ=−ϵ0+n⋅ϵ is bounded because ∣Qϵ∣2≤2(∣ϵ0∣2+∣ϵ∣2) pointwise. Thus K0=ker⁡Q is closed. For ϵ∈K0, n⋅ϵ=ϵ0, so n⋅Tϵ=0 and Tϵ∈HT by [F1]. Also ∥Tϵ∥2≤∥ϵ∥2+∥ϵ0∥2, proving boundedness.

2.1F1step 1.1givenalgebra

Write ϵ=Tϵ+nϵ0 and δ=Tδ+nδ0. The cross terms in ϵ†δ vanish because each T vector is orthogonal to n, while the remaining n term is ϵ0‾δ0 and cancels the time component −ϵ0‾δ0 of η. Hence [ϵ,δ]η=⟨Tϵ,Tδ⟩2. Given any u∈HT, ϵ=(0,u) belongs to K0 and Tϵ=u, so T is onto.

3.1F1step 2.1given

The equation Tϵ=0 is equivalent to ϵ=nϵ0, so ϵ=b(1,n) with b=ϵ0∈L2; each such vector is in K0. Step 2.1 shows these vectors pair to zero with every member of K0. Conversely, if ϵ pairs to zero with all of K0, choose δ=(0,Tϵ), which lies in K0 by [F1]; then 0=[ϵ,δ]η=∥Tϵ∥22, so Tϵ=0. Thus the radical is exactly N.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1given∎

The induced map K0/N→HT, [ϵ]↦Tϵ, is well-defined, injective by the kernel calculation, onto by step 2.1, and preserves the inner product by that same step. It is therefore an isometry onto the complete Hilbert space HT, proving positivity and completeness of the quotient.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources