Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smeared Coulomb photon operator distribution

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let j=(j1,j2,j3)∈Cc∞(R4;R3) and use HT and PT from Positive transverse photon one-particle space. For ω=∣k∣ and k≠0, define gj(k)=1(2π)3/2(2ω)1/2 PT(k)∫R4j(x)eiωx0−ik⋅x d4x. Then gj∈HT. On the finite-particle domain Dfin of the bosonic Fock space Fs(HT), the smeared transverse potential is AT(j)=a(gj)+a†(gj). Its matrix elements are continuous in the test-function topology; it is an operator-valued distribution and does not assign a pointwise operator to Ai(x). With Ei=−∂0Ai, the equal-time canonical commutator is the distribution [Ai(0,x),Ej(0,y)]=−i PT,ij(−i∇x)δ3(x−y).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; compact smooth real vector tests; the transverse projection; and the bosonic Fock CCR on Dfin.

[A1]
[F1]

PT is an orthogonal projection of norm at most one and HT is its closed range. Positive transverse photon one-particle space

[F2]

On finite-particle vectors, [a(h),a†(k)]=⟨h,k⟩2I and the sector maps have bounds ∥an(h)∥≤n∥h∥, ∥an†(h)∥≤n+1∥h∥. Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains

[F3]

Bosonic Fock space is the square-summable direct sum of symmetric particle sectors, Dfin consists of vectors with only finitely many nonzero sectors, and the test class Cc∞ has its locally convex LF topology. Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions

[F4]

Assuming Countable Choice, finite rational linear combinations of indicators of rational boxes form a countable dense subset of real L2(R3). Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of Lp(Rn) for 1≤p<∞

[F5]

A finite product of at most countable sets is at most countable, by iterating the two-set product theorem. A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable

[F6]

A topological space is separable when it has an at most countable dense subset. Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F3], and the test j in the statement.

1.1A1F1givenalgebra

The integral in gj is the spacetime Fourier transform of a compactly supported smooth function, hence decreases faster than every inverse power of ∣(ω,k)∣ by repeated integration by parts. Near k=0, it is bounded by ∫∣j∣, while the squared prefactor is 1/(2ω)=1/(2∣k∣). The radial integral of this bound is a constant times ∫01r2/r dr<∞. At infinity the rapid Fourier decay and ∥PT∥≤1 make the squared norm integrable. Also PTgj=gj almost everywhere. Therefore gj∈HT.

2.1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1given

The one-particle space HT is also separable, although [F2] applies to every complex Hilbert space. Let D be the countable dense subset of real L2(R3) supplied by [F4]. Its sixfold product is countable by [F5]; identifying each tuple with a three-component complex function whose real and imaginary components lie in D gives a dense subset of H. Density follows by approximating the six real L2 components, since the squared complex-vector norm is the sum of their squared norms. Hence H is separable in its norm topology by [F6]. The image of this countable set under the bounded projection MPT is countable and dense in HT: for u∈HT, MPTu=u, so projected approximants to u converge to u. Thus HT is separable in its norm topology by [F6], and [F2] applies. By [F3], a vector in Dfin has only finitely many nonzero sectors. On each such sector [F2] bounds creation and annihilation by the corresponding square-root particle number times ∥gj∥∥Ψn∥. Thus both maps and their sum are defined on Dfin. The same estimates bound every matrix element between fixed finite-particle vectors by a constant times ∥gj∥. On each fixed compact support, repeated integration by parts in step 1.1 bounds ∥gj∥ by finitely many smooth-test seminorms, so these matrix elements are continuous in the test-function topology. This proves the asserted distributional smearing without defining a point field.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1givenalgebra

Write ω=∣k∣, and use the Fourier convention f^(k)=∫R3f(x)e−ik⋅x d3x. The expansion implied by the definition of gj is Ai(x0,x)=∫R3d3k(2π)3/2(2ω)1/2(ai(k)e−iωx0+ik⋅x+ai†(k)eiωx0−ik⋅x), Ei(x0,x)=−∂0Ai(x0,x)=∫R3d3k(2π)3/2(ω2)1/2(iai(k)e−iωx0+ik⋅x−iai†(k)eiωx0−ik⋅x). Smearing the first line with j∈Cc∞(R4;R3) gives exactly a(gj)+a†(gj): the annihilation term uses conjugate-linearity of a, while the creation term is linear in its argument. Here the formula is for k≠0; values at k=0 are irrelevant to the integrals. The symbols ai(k) and ai†(k) are distributional notation for the Fock maps: for Schwartz vectors u,v:R3→C3 set a(u):=a(PTu) and a†(v):=a†(PTv). Then [F2] gives [a(u),a†(v)]=∫ui(k)‾PT,ij(k)vj(k) d3k I, equivalently the kernel notation [ai(k),aj†(q)]=PT,ij(k)δ3(k−q)I. The mode integrals are understood after test smearing; near k=0 their squared one-particle weights behave respectively as 1/ω and ω, both locally integrable against d3k, and at infinity the Fourier transforms of the spatial tests decrease rapidly.

4.1F1F2F3step 2.1given∎

For real f,h∈S(R3;R3), define the equal-time spatial smearings by pairing the mode distributions with the spatial tests, A(f):=∑i∫R3fi(x)Ai(0,x) d3x and E(h):=∑j∫R3hj(y)Ej(0,y) d3y. The one-particle vectors in these definitions are gf(k)=PT(k)f^(k)(2π)3/2(2ω)1/2,eh(k)=−iω1/2PT(k)h^(k)(2π)3/221/2. These belong to HT by the preceding bounds, and A(f)=a(gf)+a†(gf), E(h)=a(eh)+a†(eh). The CCR [F2] gives [A(f),E(h)]=−i∫R3d3k(2π)3 f^i(k)‾PT,ij(k)h^j(k) I. For real f,h, this Fourier integral is real because PT is real and even and f^(−k)=f^(k)‾, h^(−k)=h^(k)‾. Equivalently, as a tempered distribution in z=x−y, [Ai(0,x),Ej(0,y)]=−iKij(x−y),Kij(z)=(2π)−3∫R3PT,ij(k)eik⋅z d3k. The last integral defines a tempered distribution because PT is measurable and bounded: for φ∈S(R3) its pairing is (2π)−3∫PT,ij(k)φ^(−k) d3k, which is absolutely convergent. Since the Fourier symbol of PT,ij(−i∇) is PT,ij(k), this distribution is exactly PT,ij(−i∇x)δ3(x−y). The sign is negative because E=−∂0A: the annihilation/creation cross terms contribute −i/2 each at equal time. Thus the stated equal-time commutator holds distributionally after smearing, with its stated sign.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources