Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gauss multiplier and smooth periodic Coulomb solver

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the conventions of Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions. Let I⊆R be a nonempty open time interval, with t measured in seconds and x0=ct, and let TL3=(R/LZ)3 be the flat spatial torus with period L>0 metres and periodic coordinates x. Take jointly smooth periodic maps A:I×TL3→R3,ϕ:I×TL3→R,ρ:I×TL3→R,J:I×TL3→R3. Write A˙:=∂tA for the time partial derivative at fixed x, and B:=∇×A. All spatial differential operators below are the periodic coordinate derivatives, and each displayed spatial integral and Hamiltonian is evaluated at a fixed t∈I; the time argument is suppressed in the formulas. In SI units, A has unit T m, ϕ has unit V, ρ has unit C m−3, and J has unit A m−2. Thus A˙ and ∇ϕ both have unit V m−1=T m s−1, and every term of the formal classical Lagrangian density has unit J m−3. Let c>0 have unit m s−1, let μ0>0 be the symbolic magnetic constant with unit N A−2, and put ϵ0=(μ0c2)−1 with unit F m−1; no numerical value for these constants is adopted. Define the formal classical density L=ϵ02∣A˙+∇ϕ∣2−12μ0∣∇×A∣2−ρϕ+J⋅A. The canonical momenta are πA=ϵ0(A˙+∇ϕ), with unit C m−2, and πϕ=0. Periodic integration by parts gives the fixed-time Hamiltonian H(t)=∫TL3(∣πA∣22ϵ0+∣B∣22μ0+ϕ(∇⋅πA+ρ)−J⋅A)d3x. Variation of the multiplier ϕ imposes ∇⋅πA+ρ=0. In Coulomb gauge ∇⋅A=0, this becomes −Δϕ=ρ/ϵ0. At each fixed t, a smooth periodic solution can exist only if ∫TL3ρ(x,t) d3x=0. If ∫TL3ρ(x,t) d3x=0 for every t∈I, there is a unique jointly smooth periodic solution with zero spatial mean, whose Fourier coefficients are ϕ^0(t)=0,ϕ^k(t)=ρ^k(t)ϵ0∣2πk/L∣2(k≠0),ρ^k(t)=L−3∫[0,L]3ρ(x,t)e−2πik⋅x/L d3x. For every t∈I it satisfies ϵ02∫TL3∣∇ϕ∣2 d3x=12∫TL3ρϕ d3x=L32ϵ0∑k≠0∣ρ^k(t)∣2∣2πk/L∣2≥0. This is a classical conditional solver for smooth periodic neutral data; it makes no claim about quantum density products or nonperiodic boundary conditions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the positive symbolic SI constants and units stated in the theorem; jointly smooth periodic maps on I×TL3; the fixed-time convention for A˙; and the Fourier convention stated in the theorem.

[A1]

The convention sets ϵ0=(μ0c2)−1 with positive symbolic SI constants. Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions

[F1]

On the normalized torus, the Fourier characters form a complete orthonormal basis and Parseval holds; the theorem's torus measure is normalized to total mass one. The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus

[A2]

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1], [A2], the smooth periodic data, and periodic boundary conditions.

1.1A1givenalgebra

Since the displayed density contains no ϕ˙, its canonical momentum is πϕ=∂L/∂ϕ˙=0. Differentiating with respect to A˙ gives πA=ϵ0(A˙+∇ϕ). The Legendre expression πA⋅A˙−L equals ∣πA∣22ϵ0−πA⋅∇ϕ+∣∇×A∣22μ0+ρϕ−J⋅A. The periodic boundary has no surface term, and integrating −πA⋅∇ϕ gives ϕ ∇⋅πA. This yields the displayed H; varying the scalar multiplier gives the Gauss constraint. If ∇⋅A=0, then ∇⋅πA=ϵ0Δϕ, so the constraint is −Δϕ=ρ/ϵ0.

1.2givenalgebra

Integrating this equation over the periodic box at any fixed t gives 0=L−3∫(−Δϕ) d3x=L−3ϵ0−1∫ρ d3x, since each periodic first derivative has equal boundary values on opposite faces. Thus neutrality is necessary at each time. For neutral data, fix a compact interval K⊂I and integers r,M≥0. Differentiating the Fourier coefficient under the integral gives ∂trρ^k(t)=L−3∫[0,L]3∂trρ(x,t)e−2πik⋅x/L d3x. For k≠0, repeated periodic integration by parts M times in a coordinate j with ∣kj∣≥∣k∣/3 gives ∣∂trρ^k(t)∣≤Cr,M,K(1+∣k∣)−M uniformly for t∈K; boundedness of the finitely many low modes is absorbed in the constant. Since ϕ^k=ρ^k/(ϵ0∣2πk/L∣2) for k≠0, a mixed derivative ∂tr∂xα of its Fourier series is bounded termwise on K×TL3 by a constant times ∣k∣∣α∣−M−2. Taking M>∣α∣+1 makes this series absolutely and uniformly summable over Z3∖{0}. Thus every mixed derivative series converges uniformly on compact time intervals, and the Fourier construction is jointly smooth.

2.1A1A2F1step 1.2given

Under Countable Choice [A2], apply [F1] after rescaling x=Ly: the characters e2πik⋅x/L form a complete basis for L−3d3x. The coefficient formula then gives ∣2πk/L∣2ϕ^k(t)=ρ^k(t)/ϵ0 for k≠0 and the zero mode is zero. Step 1.2 permits termwise differentiation in space and time to every order, so the resulting real jointly smooth periodic ϕ solves −Δϕ=ρ/ϵ0 at every t. Reality follows from ρ^−k(t)=ρ^k(t)‾.

3.1A1F1step 2.1given∎

At any fixed t, if two zero-mean solutions existed, their difference u would be smooth, periodic, satisfy Δu=0, and have u^0=0. Periodic integration by parts in each Fourier coefficient gives Δu^k=−∣2πk/L∣2u^k; since Δu=0, every nonzero-mode coefficient vanishes, and the zero-mode coefficient vanishes by the zero-mean condition. Completeness of the Fourier basis [F1] therefore gives u=0 in L2, hence everywhere by continuity. Parseval applied to ∇ϕ and to ϕ,ρ yields ∫∣∇ϕ∣2=L3∑k≠0∣2πk/L∣2∣ϕ^k∣2,∫ρϕ=L3∑k≠0ρ^k‾ϕ^k. Substituting the coefficients from step 2.1 proves the displayed positive-energy identity.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources