Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equivariant tubular and slice neighborhoods for compact torus actions

Statement

Assume countable choice. Let T=(R/Z)r act smoothly on a compact finite-dimensional smooth manifold M without boundary, and let g be a T-invariant Riemannian metric. If S⊆M is a compact embedded T-invariant submanifold, its orthogonal normal bundle ν(S) has a T-invariant open disk neighborhood Dϵ(ν(S)) of the zero section, and the normal exponential map is a T-equivariant diffeomorphism from that disk bundle onto a T-invariant open neighborhood of S. In particular, for x∈M, with stabilizer H=Tx, orbit O=T⋅x, and normal fiber V=νx(O), let H act on V by its differentials. There is an open H-invariant disk Dϵ(V) such that [t,v], the equivalence class of (t,v) under (t,v)∼(th,h−1v) for h∈H, maps by [t,v]↦t⋅exp⁡x(v) to a T-equivariant diffeomorphism from T×HDϵ(V) onto an open neighborhood Ux of O. Every stabilizer of a point in Ux is a subgroup of H.

Statement references

[Orbit tubes and isotropy groups] Atiyah–Bott, Section 3, printed pp. 6–8

[Equivariant tubular neighborhood and localization proof] Dwivedi et al., Section 9.10, PDF pp. 86–87

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, the compact smooth torus action, and the invariant metric g.

[A1]

Countable choice is used by the orbit, geodesic, and metric interfaces. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

The preceding local lemma constructs a T-invariant metric for the given action. Fixed loci and normal weights of compact torus actions

[F2]

For a smooth action, the orbit map factors through T/Tx as an injective immersion; under countable choice the stabilizer is closed Lie and this quotient is a smooth homogeneous manifold. Every orbit is an injectively immersed homogeneous space

[F3]

Geodesic evaluation is smooth on an open neighborhood of the zero section; isometries preserve geodesics and uniqueness determines their images. Existence uniqueness and smooth dependence of geodesics Local isometries send geodesics to geodesics

[F4]

An invertible differential makes a smooth map a local diffeomorphism. The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds

Proof

Given: The data in the statement.

1.1A1F2F5

For a point x∈M, let H=Tx. By [F2], O=T⋅x has the intrinsic manifold T/H and its orbit map into M is a continuous injective immersion. The domain T/H is compact as a continuous image of compact T, and M is Hausdorff, so [F5] makes the orbit map a homeomorphism onto O; together with immersion this makes O an embedded submanifold.

1.2F3F4givenalgebra

Now let S⊆M be any compact invariant embedded submanifold and write E(p,v)=exp⁡p(v) on the open set where the geodesic exists up to time 1. The geodesic theorem in [F3] makes this a smooth map on an open neighborhood of the zero section. At (p,0), its differential on TpS⊕νp(S) is (u,w)↦u+w: on the zero section E(p,0)=p, while dds∣s=0E(p,sw)=w by the initial-velocity definition and time rescaling of the geodesic. This is an isomorphism because TpM=TpS⊕νp(S), so [F4] makes E a local diffeomorphism at every point of the zero section.

2.1A1F4F5step 1.2

The zero section of ν(S) is compact. A finite cover by the local diffeomorphism neighborhoods in step 1.2, followed by shrinking in local bundle charts, gives ϵ0>0 such that E is defined and a local diffeomorphism on Dϵ0(ν(S)). Suppose no smaller uniform disk is injective. For each sufficiently large n, choose distinct (pn,vn),(qn,wn) with ∥vn∥,∥wn∥<1/n and E(pn,vn)=E(qn,wn). Compactness and first countability of S give a subsequence with pn→p and then one with qn→q: compactness gives a cluster point and a countable neighborhood basis gives the subsequence. Continuity and the vanishing fiber norms imply E(pn,vn)→p, E(qn,wn)→q, hence p=q by Hausdorffness of M. Both bundle points then converge to (p,0), contradicting local injectivity near (p,0). Thus E is injective on some Dϵ(ν(S)), and since it is a local diffeomorphism there, it is a diffeomorphism onto its open image.

3.1F1F3step 2.1

Each t∈T is an isometry of g, so [F3] and uniqueness of geodesics give E(t⋅p,(dt)pv)=t⋅E(p,v). The norm of the normal vector is preserved, so the disk Dϵ(ν(S)) and its image are T-invariant, proving the equivariant tubular assertion.

4.1F2step 1.1step 3.1

Apply the tube construction to S=O from step 1.1. The normal bundle of O is T-equivariantly isomorphic to T×HV by [t,v]↦(t⋅x,(dt)xv); this is well defined because replacing (t,v) by (th,h−1v) leaves the vector unchanged. The isomorphism is smooth in the homogeneous charts of [F2], and it identifies the normal disk bundle with T×HDϵ(V). If g0 fixes a point [t,v], then g0tH=tH, hence t−1g0t∈H; because T is abelian this means g0∈H. Thus every stabilizer in the slice neighborhood is contained in H.

5.1step 2.1step 4.1∎

If S=∅ the zero bundle and neighborhood are empty. If S=M, the normal bundle has rank zero and E is the identity. For the orbit of a fixed point, H=T and the displayed slice is the ordinary invariant normal disk.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources