Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Restriction of coherent sections to a relatively compact open set is compact

Statement

Assume full AC. Let m≥1, let Ω⊆Cm be open, and let Ω′⊆Ω be open with compact closure contained in Ω. Let F be a coherent analytic module on a neighborhood of Ω‾′. Suppose it has a finite presentation by free sheaves on Ω and that the presentation section maps on both Ω and Ω′ are surjective. Give the two section spaces the quotient topologies from compact-convergence on the finite free section spaces. Then the restriction map Γ(Ω,F)→Γ(Ω′,F) is compact, meaning that it sends some neighborhood of zero to a set with compact closure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; m≥1; open sets Ω′⋐Ω⊆Cm; a coherent module; and surjective finite-presentation section maps on both sets.

[A1]

Full AC is the set-choice postulate and is an explicit hypothesis of the Ascoli–Arzelà input (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Holomorphic section spaces carry compact-convergence Fréchet topologies, and the coherent section quotients are well-defined Fréchet spaces (Fréchet spaces used in analytic coherent cohomology, Coherent-section quotient topologies are Fréchet and presentation-independent).

[F2]

Cauchy estimates bound first derivatives on a smaller polydisc by a uniform bound on a larger polydisc (Cauchy estimates for mixed derivatives on a polydisc).

[F3]

Under full AC, an equicontinuous family of continuous functions on a compact metric space has compact closure in the uniform topology when its values are pointwise relatively compact (Ascoli–Arzelà in the uniform topology for nonempty compact metric domains).

[F5]

A surjective section map defines the quotient topology, and compact-convergence on finite free section spaces is the topology used in the coherent-section definition (Presentation and Čech quotient topologies for coherent analytic sections).

[F6]

For d≥1, bounded closed subsets of Cd are compact by its real-coordinate identification and Heine–Borel; C0 is a singleton and is compact as well (For a nonempty subset of Rn with n≥1, compactness, closedness and boundedness, pseudocompactness, and attainment of extrema by every continuous real-valued function are equivalent, Complex m-space and its real coordinate dictionary).

Proof

1.1F2F5givenconstruct

If Ω′=∅, the target section space is zero and restriction is the zero compact map. Otherwise, since Ω′‾ is compact in Ω, choose a compact set L with Ω′‾⊆int⁡L⊆L⊆Ω. The set B={f∈O(Ω)p:sup⁡L∥f∥<1} is an open neighborhood of zero in the compact-convergence topology. Cover Ω′‾ by finitely many smaller polydiscs whose slightly larger closed polydiscs lie in int⁡L. By [F2], the family B has uniformly bounded first derivatives on each smaller polydisc, hence is equicontinuous and uniformly bounded on each compact subset of Ω′.

2.1A1F1F3F4F6step 1.1

For integers j≥1, use the compact exhaustion Kj={z∈Ω′:∣z∣≤j, dist⁡(z,Cm∖Ω′)≥1/j}, with distance to the empty set taken as +∞. Each Kj is compact by [F6], and their union is Ω′. On each nonempty Kj, the family from step 1.1 is equicontinuous and pointwise relatively compact: its values lie in a bounded subset of Cp, whose closure is compact by [F6] (for p=0 the target is the singleton). Apply [F3] and take nested subsequences diagonally; every sequence in the restrictions of B then has a subsequence converging uniformly on every Kj. Its limit is holomorphic by [F4]. By [F1] the compact-convergence topology on O(Ω′)p is metrizable, so this sequential compactness proves that the restricted set has compact closure. Thus restriction O(Ω)p→O(Ω′)p sends the neighborhood B to a set with compact closure.

3.1F1F5step 2.1given∎

Let Q and Q′ be the quotient maps from the finite free section spaces onto Γ(Ω,F) and Γ(Ω′,F). The image N=Q(B) is a neighborhood of zero because a quotient map is open. Every section in N has a lift in B, so the restriction identity res⁡F∘Q=Q′∘res⁡O puts res⁡F(N) inside Q′(res⁡O(B)). The latter has compact closure, being a continuous image of the compact closure from step 2.1. Thus the coherent-section restriction is compact.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources