Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Schwartz compact-perturbation theorem for Fréchet spaces

Statement

Assume the full Axiom of Choice. Let E and F be Fréchet spaces over C. A continuous linear map g:E→F is called a quasi-epimorphism when its image is closed and has finite codimension in F. A continuous linear map h:E→F is called compact when the image of some neighborhood of 0 has compact closure in F. If g is a quasi-epimorphism and h is compact, then g+h:E→F is a quasi-epimorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; Fréchet spaces E,F; a continuous linear quasi-epimorphism g:E→F; and a compact continuous linear map h:E→F.

[F1]

Full AC is the set-choice postulate (The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

A continuous surjective linear map between Fréchet spaces is open (Open mapping theorem for Fréchet spaces).

[F3]

A Fréchet space is a Hausdorff complete metrizable locally convex vector space (Fréchet spaces used in analytic coherent cohomology).

Proof

1.1F2F3givenconstruct

First, if a continuous linear map T:E0→F0 between Fréchet spaces has finite-codimensional image, then that image is closed and T is open onto its image. Its kernel is closed, so E0/ker⁡T is Hausdorff and locally convex. The quotient seminorms from a countable defining family (pj)j≥1 metrize it. To verify completeness, choose a decreasing absolutely convex neighborhood basis Un in E0 with Un+1⊆18Un and pj(u)≤2−n for every u∈Un and j≤n. From any Cauchy sequence of cosets choose a subsequence whose nth successive difference lies in the quotient image of Un, and lift each difference to un∈Un. For each fixed j, ∑npj(un)<∞, so the partial sums are Cauchy in the Fréchet topology and converge in E0. Their image, added to the initial coset, is the limit of the subsequence; the original Cauchy sequence converges to the same coset. Hence E0/ker⁡T is Fréchet. Choose a finite-dimensional algebraic complement S to T(E0) in F0. The induced map (E0/ker⁡T)⊕S→F0, ([x],s)↦T(x)+s, is a continuous linear bijection between Fréchet spaces. By [F2] it is a homeomorphism. The closed subspace (E0/ker⁡T)⊕{0} therefore maps to the closed subspace T(E0), and the quotient map E0→E0/ker⁡T shows that T is open onto T(E0).

2.1F2F3step 1.1givenconstruct

Choose a finite-dimensional complement S to the closed finite-codimensional subspace g(E) and let q:F→F/S be the quotient. The induced gˉ=qg:E→F/S is a continuous open surjection: g:E→g(E) is open by step 1.1, and q∣g(E):g(E)→F/S is a continuous bijection between Fréchet spaces, hence a homeomorphism by [F2]. The induced hˉ=qh is compact. Choose an absolutely convex neighborhood U of 0 in E such that K:=hˉ(U)‾ is compact, and set V=gˉ(U); then V is an open absolutely convex neighborhood of 0 in F/S. Compactness gives b1,…,bN∈K with K⊆⋃j(bj+12V). Put S0=span⁡{b1,…,bN} and let p:F/S→(F/S)/S0 be the quotient. Then p(K)⊆12p(V).

3.1F1step 2.1constructalgebra

Write G=pgˉ, H=phˉ, and W=p(V). The map G is surjective and G(U)=W. For any y0∈W, choose x0∈U with Gx0=y0 and set y1=y0−(G+H)x0=−Hx0∈p(K)⊆12W. Inductively, if yn∈21−np(K)⊆2−nW, choose xn∈2−nU with Gxn=yn; then yn+1:=yn−(G+H)xn=−Hxn∈2−np(K). Thus yn∈21−np(K) for all n≥1.

4.1F1F3step 3.1construct

It remains to choose these lifts so their series converges. Let (Uj)j≥1 be a decreasing absolutely convex neighborhood basis in E with Uj+1⊆18Uj. For fixed j, the increasing open sets G(2nUj∩12U), n≥1, cover G(12U)=12W: every point of this image has a lift in 12U, and the sets 2nUj exhaust E. Their images are open because G is open. Since the compact set p(K) lies in 12W, compactness gives an integer N(j) such that p(K)⊆G(2N(j)Uj∩12U); enlarge the N(j) if needed so they strictly increase. Keep x0 separate. Retain the finitely many tail lifts xn for 1≤n≤N(1) from step 3.1 and their resulting residual yN(1)+1. Thereafter choose each new lift recursively using its current residual, and define the next residual by yn+1=yn−(G+H)xn; the bounds of step 3.1 continue to hold because each new lift still belongs to 2−nU. For each block N(j)<n≤N(j+1), since yn∈21−np(K) choose kn∈K with p(kn)=2n−1yn. Choose zn∈2N(j)Uj∩12U with Gzn=p(kn), which is possible by the defining inclusion for N(j), and put xn=21−nzn. Then Gxn=yn and xn∈2N(j)+1−nUj∩2−nU. The sum over this block lies in 2Uj, because the coefficients 2N(j)+1−n sum to less than 2. The sum of all later block bounds is at most 2∑k≥18−kUj=27Uj⊂Uj, so tails after sufficiently late blocks lie in any prescribed neighborhood in the basis. The same bound applies to partial sums within each block, so arbitrary tails also tend to zero as the block index grows. The tail partial sums are Cauchy in the defining seminorms; by [F3] they converge to x=∑n≥1xn∈E, with x0 excluded.

5.1F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra

The compact set p(K) is bounded in the locally convex space (F/S)/S0: for any balanced neighborhood Q of zero, the dilates tQ (t>0) cover the space, so compactness gives a finite subcover of p(K) and, since Q is balanced, one largest dilate contains all of p(K). Therefore yn∈21−np(K) tends to 0. The recursively maintained residual identity gives (G+H)∑n=1mxn=y1−ym+1. Passing to the limit using continuity yields (G+H)x=y1. Thus (G+H)(x0+x)=y0, so G+H maps onto (F/S)/S0. It follows that F=(g+h)(E)+q−1(S0), where q−1(S0) is finite-dimensional because S and S0 are finite-dimensional. Thus (g+h)(E) has finite codimension; step 1.1 makes it closed, proving that g+h is a quasi-epimorphism.

6.1F1step 2.1step 5.1∎

The conclusion holds for every full-AC Fréchet pair and every pair of maps with the stated hypotheses, including the case g(E)=F (then S=0) and the case h=0 (then one may take K={0}).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources