Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hadamard contractions preserve microcausal polynomial functionals

Statement

Assume ACω and let ℏ be a formal indeterminate. Let W∈D′(M×M) be a scalar Hadamard bisolution. For F,G∈Fμcpoly(M), let deg⁡F be the largest degree with nonzero coefficient kernel, with deg⁡0=0, and define, coefficientwise in ℏ, F⋆WG=∑r=0min⁡(deg⁡F,deg⁡G)ℏrr!⟨F(r)(ϕ)⊗G(r)(ϕ), W⊗r⟩. Each term is formed by the distribution product on the r contracted variable pairs and proper pushforward over those pairs, as in Product and pullback under wavefront transversality, integrating with the metric density μg in each contracted variable. The sum is finite and defines a member of Fμcpoly(M)⟦ℏ⟧. If K∈C∞(M×M) is symmetric, then ΓKF(ϕ)=⟨F(2)(ϕ),χKμg⊗2⟩ is also a compactly supported polynomial microcausal functional and lowers polynomial degree by two; here χ is any compactly supported cutoff equal to one near supp⁡F(2)(ϕ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the globally hyperbolic Lorentzian manifold of Wavefront and positive-frequency Hadamard data, a Hadamard bisolution W, and F,G∈Fμcpoly(M).

[A1]

Assume only the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Every functional derivative has compact support and its wavefront set avoids the all-future and all-past causal covector cones, including zero entries (Compactly supported polynomial microcausal functionals).

[F2]

A Hadamard kernel has wavefront set consisting of pairs (x,k;y,−ℓ) with k,ℓ future null and related by null-geodesic cotangent transport (Wavefront and positive-frequency Hadamard data).

[F3]

Distribution products and compact density-weighted pushforwards have the wavefront bounds in the Statement of Product and pullback under wavefront transversality. Its Proof, step 1.1, proves the additional tensor-product bound: for distributions u,v on M, with 0M denoting the zero section, WF⁡(u⊗v)⊆((WF⁡(u)∪0M)×(WF⁡(v)∪0M))∖0M×M. The same proof applies to two possibly different product manifolds: product cutoffs factor the Fourier transform, and rapid decay in a nonzero regular block dominates the polynomial bound in the other block on a sufficiently small cone. Repeated application gives the bound for tensor powers, with each factor covector either zero or in that factor's wavefront set.

[F4]

On two original microcausal coefficient blocks, disjoint matchings of singular Hadamard cross edges and smooth self or cross edges have canonical simultaneous contractions. All intermediate products and compact pushforwards are admissible and agree in every permitted edge order; finite external derivatives give the exact Leibniz expansion. Canonical compatibility of microcausal cross contractions and smooth self contractions

Proof

Given: [A1], W, F, and G as stated.

1.1A1F1F2F3givenalgebra

Fix a contraction order r≥1, a field ϕ, and put A=F(r)(ϕ)⊗G(r)(ϕ) and B=W⊗r. By [F3], each wavefront component of B is either zero or a Hadamard pair (ki,−ℓi) with both ki,ℓi future null. If a nonzero covector of WF⁡(A) cancelled one of B, then in the F block every contracted entry would be past null or zero and in the G block every contracted entry would be future null or zero. Both full tuples would lie in the forbidden cones of [F1], contrary to microcausality. Hence WF⁡(A) has no covector opposite to WF⁡(B), and [F3] defines A⋅B. Its support is compact because it is contained in supp⁡A.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1construct

Push the product distribution forward over the r contracted pairs, integrating against μg⊗2r. The projection is proper on its compact support, so [F3] makes the result a compactly supported distribution in the remaining variables. For each homogeneous term, the two original compact coefficient kernels satisfy the microcausal condition, since F(m)(0)=m!fm and likewise for G. The contracted pairs are disjoint singular cross edges between those two blocks; all remaining field factors are smooth. Thus [F4] proves that the full product and each intermediate integration give this same canonical kernel. Differentiating this finite expression in ϕ uses the finite external-slot Leibniz rule of [F4]: for any order s, each term assigns a subset of the s labeled directions to F and the rest to G, producing contractions of F(r+a)(ϕ) and G(r+s−a)(ϕ) with the same W⊗r. This defines every output derivative as a finite sum of the same proper pushforwards. Since the polynomial degrees are finite, all contractions with r>min⁡(deg⁡F,deg⁡G) vanish and the displayed sum is finite.

3.1A1F1F2F3step 2.1

Fix an output derivative order s≥1 and one term from step 2.1, with a external directions assigned to F and s−a to G. Put A=F(r+a)(ϕ)⊗G(r+s−a)(ϕ) and B=W⊗r. Suppose a nonzero wavefront covector of the pushed-forward term were entirely future causal. By [F3] it lifts to a covector of A⋅B with zero covectors in all contracted directions. The product wavefront bound in [F3] has three cases. A contribution from WF⁡(A) alone would give an all-future nonzero tuple in one of the two functional derivatives, forbidden by [F1]; a contribution from WF⁡(B) alone has zero external covectors and cannot give the nonzero output. In a sum contribution from WF⁡(A)+WF⁡(B), the vertical zero condition makes each contracted F entry past null or zero and each contracted G entry future null or zero. The external entries of both blocks are the assumed future output entries. The full G tuple is therefore nonzero and all future, forbidden by [F1]. If the output covector were all past, the same vertical equations make the full F tuple nonzero and all past. Thus every output derivative kernel avoids both forbidden cones. The case r=0 is covered by the WF⁡(A)-alone case.

4.1F1F3givenalgebra∎

If K is smooth, multiplying F(2)(ϕ) by K is allowed by the smooth-factor case of [F3] and adds no wavefront directions. Pairing the result against the cutoff metric density χμg⊗2 is defined because the distribution has compact support. For each output derivative, the corresponding wavefront covectors of F have zero entries in the two contracted slots; if the output had an all-future or all-past nonzero covector, adjoining those zeros would put F(s+2)(ϕ) in a forbidden cone from [F1]. Hence ΓKF is microcausal. Its degree is at most deg⁡F−2 because two functional derivative slots were contracted; constants and degree-one functionals give zero.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources