Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The mass-shell weighted transverse space matches the Lebesgue transverse space

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice for the Hilbert-space supplier. Let M=R3∖{0}, let ω(k)=∣k∣, and equip M with the measure dν(k)=d3k/(2ω(k)). On C3 use the positive Hermitian pairing u‾⋅v=∑j=13uj‾vj and the complex-bilinear extension of the Euclidean dot product in the transversality condition. Define HTν={f∈L2(M,ν;C3):k⋅f(k)=0 for ν-almost every k}. Let HT0={u∈L2(M,d3k;C3):k⋅u(k)=0 for Lebesgue-almost every k} with the second-variable-linear integral pairing. Then Wf(k)=f(k)/2ω(k) is a unitary map from HTν onto HT0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the mass-shell measure and transverse fields in the Statement; the published unweighted transverse space and Hilbert-pairing conventions.

[A1]

Countable Choice, written ACω. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

The published transverse space is HT0={u∈L2(R3,d3k;C3):k⋅u(k)=0 almost everywhere off 0}, a closed Hilbert subspace under ACω. Positive transverse photon one-particle space

[F2]

The Hilbert pairing convention is conjugate-linear in the first variable and linear in the second: ⟨u,v⟩2=∫u(k)‾⋅v(k) d3k. Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions

[F3]

The Euclidean norm is ∣k∣=(k⋅k)1/2 on real vectors, and the real dot product extends complex-bilinearly for transversality. The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F3], and the definitions in the Statement.

1.1F2F3givenalgebra

The multiplier Wf(k)=f(k)/2∣k∣ is measurable on M, and ∥Wf∥L2(d3k)2=∫M∣f(k)∣22∣k∣ d3k=∥f∥L2(dν)2. The same identity for inner products shows that W is an isometry with the second-variable-linear convention of [F2].

2.1A1F1F3step 1.1givenconstruct∎

For any u∈HT0, set f(k)=2∣k∣ u(k). Then ∥f∥L2(dν)2=∫M2∣k∣ ∣u(k)∣2d3k2∣k∣=∥u∥L2(d3k)2, so f∈L2(dν;C3), Wf=u, and k⋅f(k)=2∣k∣ k⋅u(k)=0 almost everywhere. Conversely, multiplication by the positive finite scalar (2∣k∣)−1/2 preserves the transverse condition. Lebesgue measure and ν have the same null sets on M: on every annulus 1/m≤∣k∣≤m their density ratio is bounded above and below by positive constants, and these annuli cover M. Thus W maps HTν onto HT0. The isometry and surjectivity transfer completeness from the Hilbert space [F1] to HTν, so W is unitary.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources