Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Principal curvature, Cartan structure equation, and Bianchi identity

Statement

Assume ACω, and let π:P→M be a smooth right principal G-bundle with a principal connection form ω associated to H, using ZP(p)=ddt∣0pexp⁡G(tZ) for the right action. For Lie-algebra-valued forms use the graded bracket defined by alternating shuffle and the Lie bracket; in degree one, [A∧B](X,Y)=[A(X),B(Y)]−[A(Y),B(X)]. Define

Ωω:=dω+12[ω∧ω],Dωη:=dη+[ω∧η].

Then Ωω is horizontal and Ad⁡-equivariant, and Ωω=ω∘KH for the imported vertical-valued curvature KH(X,Y)=−v([hX,hY]). For any trivializing cover with smooth sections si:Ui→P, set Ai=si∗ω and Fi=si∗Ωω. On an overlap, let gij:Ui∩Uj→G be the smooth map determined by sj=sigij, and write θL(gij)=gij∗θL for the left Maurer–Cartan form. Then

Aj=Ad⁡gij−1Ai+θL(gij),Fi=dAi+12[Ai∧Ai],Fj=Ad⁡gij−1Fi,DAiFi=0,

where DAiη:=dη+[Ai∧η]. The transition equations concern changes of local sections; they do not identify an arbitrary map M→G with a global automorphism of a nontrivial bundle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a smooth right principal G-bundle P→M, a principal connection H, its form ω, and local smooth sections si.

[A1]

ACω is countable choice, inherited through the Lie-group tangent-bracket and horizontal-connection inputs. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

The connection form satisfies ω(ZP)=Z, ker⁡ω=H, and Rg∗ω=Ad⁡g−1ω; κH=ω∘KH. Principal connection 1-form from a horizontal distribution

[F2]

The vertical curvature is KH(X,Y)=−v([hX,hY]), with TP=VP⊕H and right-invariant horizontal distribution. Principal connections and vertical curvature

[F3]

The graded bracket of g-valued forms has the shuffle convention, graded skew-symmetry, graded Jacobi, and the exterior-derivative rule stated in its definition. Graded bracket of Lie-algebra-valued differential forms

[F4]

Each Ad⁡g=d(Cg)e is a Lie-algebra automorphism, and Ad⁡gh=Ad⁡gAd⁡h. Conjugation and the adjoint representation of a Lie group, Adjoint is a smooth Lie-group representation, Differential of a Lie-group homomorphism is a Lie-algebra homomorphism

[F5]

The derivative of the adjoint representation at the identity is d(Ad⁡)e(Z)=ad⁡Z. The differential of Ad is ad

[F6]

The left Maurer–Cartan form has fibre map (θL)g=d(Lg−1)g; thus θL(gij)(X)=d(Lgij−1)gij(dgij(X)). Left Maurer--Cartan form

[F8]

A smooth principal bundle has local equivariant diffeomorphisms π−1(Ui)≅Ui×G, hence smooth local sections and unique smooth transition maps on overlaps. Smooth principal G-bundle

[F9]

For a 1-form λ, (LXλ)(Y)=X(λ(Y))−λ([X,Y]), from the flow definition of tensor Lie derivative and LXY=[X,Y]. The Lie derivative of a tensor field, The Lie derivative of a differential form, The Lie derivative of a vector field equals the Lie bracket, The Lie bracket of smooth vector fields

Proof

1.1A1F1F3F5F7F9

For a fundamental field ZP, ω(ZP)=Z is constant. The exterior-derivative formula therefore gives dω(ZP,Y)=ZP(ω(Y))−ω([ZP,Y])=(LZPω)(Y) by [F9]. Differentiating Rexp⁡(tZ)∗ω=Ad⁡exp⁡(−tZ)ω at t=0, [F5] yields LZPω=−[Z,ω]. The shuffle convention gives 12[ω∧ω](ZP,Y)=[Z,ω(Y)], so Ωω(ZP,Y)=0. Every vertical vector is fundamental by the orbit-differential isomorphism, hence Ωω is horizontal.

1.2F1F3F4F7

Pullback commutes with d, and the fixed linear map Ad⁡g−1 preserves the Lie bracket by [F4]. Consequently, for fixed g∈G, Rg∗Ωω=d(Ad⁡g−1ω)+12[Ad⁡g−1ω∧Ad⁡g−1ω]=Ad⁡g−1Ωω. This is the claimed equivariance.

1.3F1F6F8

On an overlap, differentiate sj(x)=si(x)gij(x) along X∈TxM. The derivative is the sum of d(Rgij(x))dsi(X) and the fundamental vertical vector at sj(x) generated by θL(gij)(X), since gij(x)−1gij(x(t)) has initial tangent θL(gij)(X) at the identity. Applying ω, its right equivariance and reproduction property give Aj(X)=Ad⁡gij−1Ai(X)+θL(gij)(X).

1.4F1F3F7

By [F7] and the graded-derivation rule in [F3], dΩω=12d[ω∧ω]=[dω∧ω], because graded skew-symmetry gives [ω∧dω]=−[dω∧ω]. Hence DωΩω=dΩω+[ω∧Ωω]=12[ω∧[ω∧ω]]=0, the last equality being graded Jacobi from [F3] and the Jacobi identity in [F1]. Pulling back by each si gives DAiFi=dFi+[Ai∧Fi]=0.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

For horizontal vector fields X,Y, ω(X)=ω(Y)=0, so Ωω(X,Y)=dω(X,Y)=−ω([X,Y]). Meanwhile ω(KH(X,Y))=−ω(v([X,Y]))=−ω([X,Y]), since ω vanishes on the horizontal component. Both Ωω and KH depend only on the horizontal components of their inputs, so the equality extends to all X,Y: Ωω=ω∘KH. This fixes the sign relative to the imported vertical-valued curvature.

2.2F1F3F7F8step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

By [F7], pullback along si commutes with the componentwise exterior derivative; the bracket is pointwise and pullback preserves its alternating arguments. Thus Fi=si∗Ωω=dAi+12[Ai∧Ai]. On the overlap, the same differentiated-section decomposition as in step 1.3 has a vertical term, which vanishes when inserted into Ωω by step 1.1. Its remaining term is transformed by the equivariance in step 1.2, yielding Fj=Ad⁡gij−1Fi.

3.1A1F1F2F3F7step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 1.3step 2.2step 1.4∎

The statements include the zero-dimensional or abelian Lie-algebra cases: then the corresponding brackets vanish, and each displayed identity reduces to the ordinary exterior-derivative identity. A zero-dimensional base has no nonzero 2-forms, and the formulas remain valid. Only the declared ACω is inherited from [F1] and [F2]; no global section or full choice principle is assumed.

Remarks

The following diagram records the local gauge-covariance identity. Both horizontal spaces are forms on the same overlap Ui∩Uj; the top arrow changes local section by gij, each vertical arrow forms the Cartan curvature, and the bottom arrow applies the adjoint action. Steps 1.3 and 2.2 prove commutativity; the proof does not rely on the diagram.

¬1(Uij;g)¬1(Uij;g)¬2(Uij;g)¬2(Uij;g)A7!Adg¡1ijA+µL(gij)A7!dA+12[A^A]A7!dA+12[A^A]Adg¡1ij

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources