Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite SU(2) Wilson integrals and transfer-sector well-definedness

Statement

Assume full AC and use the finite non-Abelian lattice-data interface with global group SU(2) and its smooth defining unitary representation on standard C2. Let Ns,Nt≥3 be finite integers and let a>0, β>0. Use the finite periodic Euclidean lattice Λ=(Z/NsZ)3×(Z/NtZ), with its finite oriented two-complex of vertices, positive spatial edges (x,i,t), temporal edges (x,t), and oriented plaquette boundary words. On every positive edge put an independent matrix in the compact Hausdorff Lie group

SU(2)={U∈M2(C):U∗U=I2, det⁡U=1},

and assign its inverse to reverse traversal. A vertex function Ω:Λ→SU(2) acts on an oriented link Uvw by Uvw↦ΩvUvwΩw−1. For each oriented plaquette p, let Up be the ordered product of its four boundary links, using inverse matrices for reverse traversals. Put

SΛ(U)=β∑p∈PΛ(1−12ReTr⁡2Up).

Let dU be the unique normalized left Haar Borel probability measure on SU(2), which is also right invariant, and use it as the bi-invariant link measure in the finite lattice-data interface. Let CΛ:=SU(2)E+ be the finite link-configuration space with the product Borel sigma-algebra ⨂e∈E+B(SU(2)), and let dμΛ be the finite product of dU over all positive links, formed by the finite-product measure theorem. Define

ZΛ=∫e−SΛ(U) dμΛ(U).

For every bounded Borel-measurable function O:CΛ→C, the integral ∫Oe−SΛ dμΛ is finite; moreover 0<ZΛ≤1, so its normalized expectation is defined.

For a spatial slice u=(Ux,i), define the spatial plaquette action Ss(u) by restricting the displayed action to spatial plaquettes. For two adjacent slices u′,u and temporal links ηx, define St(u′,u;η) by summing the same plaquette term over ηxUx,i′ηx+i^−1Ux,i−1. Let dμs,dμV be the corresponding finite product Haar probabilities, let Hkin=L2(SU(2)Es,dμs;C), and for h∈SU(2)Vs set (U(h)ψ)(u)=ψ(h−1⋅u), with equality in L2. Define Hphys={ψ∈Hkin:U(h)ψ=ψ for every h∈SU(2)Vs}.

K(u′,u)=e−12Ss(u′)−12Ss(u)∫e−St(u′,u;η) dμV(η),(Tψ)(u′)=∫K(u′,u)ψ(u) dμs(u).

Then Hphys is closed and contains the nonzero constant function. T is a bounded operator on Hkin with ∥T∥≤1 and maps Hkin into Hphys. The cyclic product of Nt kernels integrates to ZΛ; insertion of any bounded slice observable gives the corresponding finite-volume unnormalized expectation. No self-adjointness, positivity as a quadratic form, Hamiltonian limit, or continuum statement is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; finite Ns,Nt≥3, a,β>0; the finite oriented lattice and compact-group link-data convention stated above.

[A1]

Full AC, written as the choice-function axiom, is used for normalized Haar existence and implies Countable Choice: apply its choice function to the image set of any countable family of nonempty sets and compose with the family indexing map. This supplies the Countable Choice hypothesis of [F5]. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Normalized Haar probability on a compact group: under full AC, a compact Hausdorff group has a unique normalized left Haar probability, also right invariant.

[F2]

Compact non-Abelian Lie-group structure of SU(2): the displayed matrix group is a compact Hausdorff non-Abelian finite-dimensional real Lie group; its defining matrix representation is smooth and unitary, and 12ReTr⁡2V∈[−1,1].

[F3]

Finite non-Abelian lattice gauge data: the actual finite-lattice interface takes a finite oriented two-complex and a supplied compact noncommutative finite-dimensional Lie group with smooth unitary representation; it assigns group elements to positively oriented edges, uses inverses on reversed edges, defines the vertex gauge action and ordered face holonomies, chooses a normalized bi-invariant Borel probability and its finite product, and uses continuous conjugation- and inverse-invariant face potentials.

[F4]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product makes parameter integrals of nonnegative measurable product functions measurable and permits the iterated finite-lattice integrations.

[F5]

L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space: under Countable Choice, for every measure space (X,A,μ) the quotient L2(μ;C) of measurable square-integrable complex functions by almost-everywhere equality is a complex Hilbert space with ⟨f,g⟩=∫fg‾ dμ, linear in the first variable, inducing the quotient norm ∥f∥22=∫∣f∣2 dμ. No completeness or sigma-finiteness of the measure is required.

[F6]

For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique: for sigma-finite factor measures, the product measure exists and has the rectangle formula. Applying this two-factor theorem successively to the finite list of Haar probability factors gives the finite product measure; at each stage its total mass is one by the rectangle formula.

[F7]

The complex L2 pairing is well-defined and satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz: on every measure space the displayed complex integral pairing is representative-independent and satisfies ∣⟨f,g⟩∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2. In particular this applies on the original finite-product Haar slice measure, without passing to its completion.

Proof

1.1givenF2F3algebra

For V∈SU(2), the parametrization in [F2] gives 12ReTr⁡2V∈[−1,1] and a real trace. Thus Φ(V)=β(1−12ReTr⁡2V) is continuous. Cyclicity of trace gives Tr⁡2(gVg−1)=Tr⁡2V; unitarity gives Tr⁡2(V−1)=Tr⁡2V‾=Tr⁡2V. Hence each plaquette potential is conjugation- and inverse-invariant as required by [F3].

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

Since ReTr⁡2V∈[−2,2], the normalized Wilson factor 1−12ReTr⁡2V lies in [0,2]; hence each plaquette action term lies in [0,2β]. Since PΛ is finite, 0≤SΛ≤2β∣PΛ∣, and consequently e−2β∣PΛ∣≤e−SΛ≤1.

2.2givenF1F3F4F6step 1.1algebra

The actions Ss,St are sums of nonnegative plaquette terms by step 1.1, so 0≤K(u′,u)≤1. Matrix multiplication, inversion on SU(2), and trace are continuous, so the temporal-action integrand is nonnegative and product-measurable. The slice and vertex product Haar measures are probabilities by [F1,F6], hence sigma-finite; Tonelli [F4] makes the η-integral K measurable in (u′,u). Each slice Haar product is a probability by [F6], so ∫∣K∣2 d(μs×μs)≤1.

3.1givenA1F1F2F3F6step 2.1algebra

The compact Hausdorff group in [F2] has its normalized Haar probability by [F1]. Apply the two-factor product-measure theorem [F6] successively along the finite ordered link set; the rectangle formula at each stage gives total mass one, and [F3] identifies this iterated product with dμΛ. Integrating the bounds in step 2.1 gives e−2β∣PΛ∣≤ZΛ≤1. For bounded O, ∣∫Oe−SΛ dμΛ∣≤∥O∥∞ZΛ<∞; division by the positive lower bound for ZΛ defines its normalized expectation.

3.2A1F4F5F6F7step 2.2algebra

Apply [F5] to Xs=SU(2)Es with As=⨂e∈EsB(SU(2)) and its original product probability μs from [F6]; [A1] supplies Countable Choice, so Hkin is a complex Hilbert space with the pairing in [F5]. Let ψ∈Hkin and choose a measurable representative. Since dμs is a probability, [F7] applied to ∣ψ∣ and the constant function 1 of norm one gives ∥ψ∥L1(dμs)≤∥ψ∥L2(dμs). The kernel K is measurable and satisfies 0≤K≤1 by step 2.2, so ∫K(u′,u)ψ(u) dμs(u) converges absolutely for every u′ and is independent of the representative of ψ. The product function (u′,u)↦K(u′,u)ψ(u) is measurable, and its absolute integral over dμs(u′)dμs(u) is at most ∥ψ∥L1(dμs); Tonelli [F4] applied to the positive and negative parts of its real and imaginary parts shows that the section integral Tψ is measurable. For each u′, both K(u′,⋅)1/2 and K(u′,⋅)1/2ψ lie in L2(dμs), so [F7] applied to K(u′,⋅)1/2ψ and K(u′,⋅)1/2 gives ∣Tψ(u′)∣2≤(∫K(u′,u) dμs(u))(∫K(u′,u)∣ψ(u)∣2 dμs(u))≤∫K(u′,u)∣ψ(u)∣2 dμs(u), because the first factor is at most one. Integrating in u′ and applying Tonelli again yields ∥Tψ∥L2(dμs)2≤∫∣ψ(u)∣2(∫K(u′,u) dμs(u′))dμs(u)≤∥ψ∥L2(dμs)2, since K≤1 and dμs is a probability. Linearity follows from linearity of the absolutely convergent section integral. Thus T is a well-defined bounded linear operator with ∥T∥≤1.

4.1givenA1F1F3F5F6step 3.2algebra

Each spatial-link transformation is a left and right translation, so it preserves its Haar factor by [F1]; the rectangle formula and uniqueness in [F6] then show the product slice measure dμs is preserved. Under independent gauge transformations h,h′ of the incoming and outgoing slices, change temporal-link variables by ηx↦hxηx(hx′)−1. Each such coordinate map also preserves Haar factors by [F1], and thus preserves dμV by [F6]. Substitution in Qx,i=ηxUx,i′ηx+i^−1Ux,i−1 cancels the neighboring h′ matrices and gives Qx,i↦hxQx,ihx−1; each spatial plaquette is likewise conjugated at its base vertex. Trace invariance therefore preserves St,Ss, and the temporal integration gives K(h′⋅u′,h⋅u)=K(u′,u) for every pair (h′,h). In particular, setting h=1 gives K(h′⋅u′,u)=K(u′,u). The pointwise integral definition established in step 3.2 now implies (Tψ)(h′⋅u′)=(Tψ)(u′) for every u′, hence as L2 classes for each fixed h′, so Tψ∈Hphys. The constant function has norm one because dμs is a probability and is fixed by every gauge transformation, so it is a nonzero physical vector.

5.1givenA1F5step 3.2step 4.1algebra

Measure preservation from step 4.1 implies that pullback by h−1 preserves measurable null sets, so U(h) is well-defined on almost-everywhere classes. It preserves the integral pairing from [F5] and has inverse U(h−1), hence is unitary on the complex Hilbert space established in step 3.2. Its fixed space is the kernel of the bounded operator U(h)−I, hence is closed; the intersection over all h is Hphys, so Hphys is closed.

6.1givenF3F4F6step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

In the cyclic product of kernels, each time slice contributes one half of Ss(ut) from the incoming factor and one half from the outgoing factor, summing to the full spatial action. Each temporal-link integral contributes exactly e−St(ut+1,ut;ηt). Therefore the product integrand before temporal-link integration is the full e−SΛ; finite-product Tonelli [F4] gives the cyclic-kernel integral ZΛ. For a bounded slice observable O(u0), the absolute value of its inserted integrand is bounded by ∥O∥∞e−SΛ≤∥O∥∞ on the finite product probability space [F6], so it is integrable. Applying [F4] to the positive and negative parts of its real and imaginary components justifies exchanging the integrations; the result is the corresponding unnormalized finite-volume expectation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources