How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tensor products of tempered distributions
Statement
Let , let and , and use the Schwartz seminorms . The iterated pairing
defines a tempered distribution . It satisfies for Schwartz functions . It agrees with the distribution tensor product on compactly supported tests, is unique with these product values, and its finite iterates are associative.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers , and .
Schwartz space and its seminorms: the seminorms define the Schwartz space.
Schwartz topology and convergence: a neighbourhood of zero restricts only finitely many seminorms.
Tempered distribution: and are continuous complex-linear functionals on their Schwartz spaces.
Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization: a compact set inside an open set admits a smooth compactly supported cutoff equal to one near that compact set.
Finite sums of product tests are dense on product open sets: finite sums of compactly supported product tests are dense in the compactly supported smooth test topology, with approximating supports in a fixed compact product.
Tensor product distributions and iterated pairings: on compactly supported tests the distribution tensor product is the iterated pairing, has the product values, is unique, and iterates associatively.
Proof
Given: [F1]–[F6].
By continuity [F3], choose a basic neighbourhood on which . Intersecting with if necessary ensures . Set , , and . For , the test lies in , so . If , every positive scalar multiple of lies in , forcing and the same bound. Applying this argument to gives finite with .
For fixed , the map is smooth with values in : Taylor's formula in the coordinates, with its remainder differentiated in , tends to zero in each on every compact set because every mixed Schwartz seminorm of is finite. Continuity of therefore makes smooth and gives . For every , [F3] and step 1.1 yield Thus .
Define . Applying the bound in step 1.1 to the finitely many seminorms with indices at most , and then the displayed estimate in step 2.1, bounds by a finite constant times the maximum of finitely many product Schwartz seminorms of . Hence is continuous on . For , the inner pairing is , giving the claimed product value; on compactly supported tests the formula is the same iterated pairing as [F6].
Finite sums of Schwartz product tests are dense in . Indeed, choose and equal to one near the unit balls by [F4], and set and . The product rule and rapid decay show in every product Schwartz seminorm: the undifferentiated tails lie outside balls of radius proportional to , and each differentiated cutoff contributes a factor on the same tails. For fixed , [F5] approximates this compactly supported smooth function by finite sums of product tests with common compact support; on that support, uniform convergence of all derivatives implies convergence in every Schwartz seminorm. Thus any two continuous functionals with the same product values agree on a dense subspace and hence everywhere. The same density argument, iterated over finitely many factors, shows that different parenthesizations of the constructed tensor product agree; this also agrees with the compact-test associativity in [F6].