Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Consistent local densities extend to an algebraic state

Statement

Assume Countable Choice for the norm completion in Norm-completed quasi-local quantum spin algebra. Let {ρΛ} be positive trace-one matrices, one on each finite-region algebra AΛ of Local spin matrix algebras and their factor inclusions, such that for every Λ⊆Λ′ their partial traces agree: Tr⁡Λ′∖Λ(ρΛ′)=ρΛ. There is a unique infinite algebraic state ω on A whose restriction to each AΛ is A↦Tr⁡Λ(ρΛA).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the local spin algebra and its norm completion, and a family ρΛ=ρΛ∗≥0 with Tr⁡ΛρΛ=1 satisfying all finite partial-trace consistency equations.

[F1]

The local algebras form a directed family with isometric inclusions; their union Aloc is a unital ∗-algebra dense in the completed C*-algebra A (Local spin matrix algebras and their factor inclusions, Local spin factor inclusions preserve the operator norm, Norm-completed quasi-local quantum spin algebra, Quasi-local algebra completion and locality).

[F2]

Finite matrix C-star algebra and density-state duality supplies the unique finite density/state correspondence and ∣Tr⁡(ρA)∣≤∥A∥ for every complex matrix A, with functional norm one for trace-one positive ρ.

[F3]

An infinite algebraic state is a bounded normalized positive functional on A, and its restrictions are represented by finite density matrices (Infinite algebraic state and finite-region restrictions).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The density family and consistency hypotheses of the Statement, Countable Choice, and the finite-matrix interface [F2].

1.1givenF1construct

For A∈AΛ, define ω0(A):=Tr⁡Λ(ρΛA). This is independent of the chosen localization region: if A is also viewed in AΔ, embed both representatives into AΛ∪Δ; the two partial-trace consistency equations make both pairings equal to the one computed using ρΛ∪Δ. Thus ω0 is a well-defined functional on Aloc.

2.1givenF2step 1.1

Linearity follows by placing any two local arguments and their sum in one common finite region. The identity has value Tr⁡Λ(ρΛI)=1, and for local A, [F2] gives ω0(A∗A)=Tr⁡Λ(ρΛA∗A)≥0. Therefore ω0 is normalized and positive on Aloc.

3.1F2step 2.1

For local A, its restriction is the normalized finite-matrix state from [F2], whose functional norm is one. Hence ∣ω0(A)∣≤∥A∥.

4.1F1F3step 2.1step 3.1construct

The bound of step 3.1 makes ω0 continuous and uniquely extendible from the dense subalgebra Aloc to a bounded linear functional ω on A, with ∥ω∥≤1. It remains normalized because I∈Aloc and ω0(I)=1; since ∥I∥=1, this also gives ∥ω∥≥1, hence ∥ω∥=1. For any X∈A, choose local Xn→X; then Xn∗Xn→X∗X by continuity of multiplication and adjoint, and ω(X∗X)=lim⁡nω0(Xn∗Xn)≥0. Thus ω is an infinite algebraic state.

5.1F1F3step 4.1∎

Any state with the prescribed local restrictions agrees with ω0 on Aloc and hence agrees with ω on its norm closure, since both are continuous and Aloc is dense. The extension is unique.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources