Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-size charge multipole remainder

Statement

Throughout this item, use one-based coordinate labels: for a vector x∈Rn (a function on {0,…,n−1} in The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn), write xi:=x(i−1) for 1≤i≤n. For a vector-valued map f, write fi(y):=f(y)(i−1) with the same convention.

Let ℓ>0, z∈R3, write d3y for three-dimensional Lebesgue measure on R3, and interpret L1(R3) relative to this measure. Define the closed Euclidean ball B‾ℓ(z):={y∈R3:∣y−z∣≤ℓ}, using the norm of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn. Let ρ∈L1(R3) be real and zero almost everywhere outside B‾ℓ(z). Write ∥ρ∥1:=∫R3∣ρ(y)∣ d3y. Let U⊆R3 be open with B‾ℓ(z)⊂U, and let b:U→Rm be C2 for a finite integer m≥1. For each component bk, let Mk:=sup⁡x∈B‾ℓ(z)∥D2bk(x)∥op<∞, where, for a real bilinear map B:R3×R3→R, define explicitly ∥B∥op:=sup⁡{∣B[u,v]∣:∣u∣≤1, ∣v∣≤1} using the Euclidean vector norm. This norm is finite, and the continuous Hessian coefficients on the compact ball make each Mk finite. Bilinearity gives ∣B[u,v]∣≤∥B∥op∣u∣∣v∣ for all u,v. Define Q:=∫ρ d3y, d:=∫(y−z)ρ(y) d3y, and B:=∫ρ(y)b(y) d3y, with all three integrals over B‾ℓ(z) and vector integrals taken componentwise. Then Bk=Q bk(z)+Dbk(z)d+Rk,∣Rk∣≤12Mkℓ2∥ρ∥1(k=1,…,m). Thus every fixed component in a smooth finite-component trivialization has the stated charge multipole remainder. A tensor-valued component may be treated only after a fixed smooth trivialization over the ball; derivatives of that trivialization enter Mk, and no covariant tensor remainder without this data is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compactly supported real ρ∈L1(R3), ℓ>0, z∈R3, and a C2 finite-component map b on a neighborhood of the closed ball, with the component Hessian bounds in the Statement.

[A1]

The charge density is real and integrable with support in the stated ball; the map b is C2 on its neighborhood and each component Hessian has the stated finite bound.

[F1]

L1 is the class of functions whose absolute value has finite Lebesgue integral, and the Lebesgue integral is linear on L1. The class L1(μ) of integrable functions; Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals; The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)

[F2]

The nonnegative integral is monotone and positively homogeneous; for an integrable real function, ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣. Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral; The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus

[F5]

The Euclidean inner product and norm are the usual positive-definite ones. The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenA1F1F2F3F5

For each component k, write D2bk(x)[u,v]=∑i,j=13aij(x)uivj. The coefficients aij are continuous because b is C2. The ball is compact by [F3], so the finitely many coefficients have a common bound Ck<∞ there. Since ∣ui∣≤∣u∣ and ∣vj∣≤∣v∣, the sum has magnitude at most 9Ck∣u∣∣v∣, hence the displayed bilinear supremum and Mk are finite. For nonzero u,v, apply that supremum to u/∣u∣,v/∣v∣ and multiply by ∣u∣∣v∣; when either vector is zero the bilinear expression is zero. This proves the homogeneous bound used below. Since ∣y−z∣≤ℓ on the support, monotonicity and homogeneity in [F2] show that each moment is absolutely integrable: ∣Q∣≤∥ρ∥1 and ∣di∣≤ℓ∥ρ∥1. By compactness of the ball and continuity of each bk, [F3] bounds bk there, so ρbk is integrable as well.

2.1givenA1F3F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

Fix y∈B‾ℓ(z) and component k, and set ϕ(t)=bk(z+t(y−z)) on [0,1]. The segment stays in the closed ball, and the chain rule [F4] gives ϕ′(0)=Dbk(z)(y−z) and ϕ′′(t)=D2bk(z+t(y−z))[y−z,y−z], hence ∣ϕ′′(t)∣≤C:=Mk∣y−z∣2. Set H(t)=(1−t)ϕ′(t)+ϕ(t) and f(t):=H′(t)=(1−t)ϕ′′(t). This derivative is continuous and Riemann integrable by [F3], so [F4] gives rk(y):=bk(y)−bk(z)−Dbk(z)(y−z)=∫01f(t) dt. To bound this Riemann integral, let h±(t):=±C(1−t). The pointwise inequalities h−≤f≤h+ imply L(h−,P)≤L(f,P) and U(f,P)≤U(h+,P) for every partition, by the infimum, supremum and positive weights in [F6]. Taking the corresponding supremum and infimum gives ∫h−≤∫f≤∫h+. The continuous functions h± have primitives ±C(t−t2/2), so [F4] evaluates their integrals as ±C/2. Consequently ∣rk(y)∣≤12Mk∣y−z∣2.

3.1givenA1F1F2step 2.1algebra∎

The function rk defined in step 2.1 is continuous on the ball. Its bound there makes ρrk absolutely Lebesgue integrable by [F2]. Multiply that component expansion by ρ(y) and integrate over B‾ℓ(z). Linearity [F1] gives Bk=Qbk(z)+Dbk(z)d+Rk, with Rk=∫B‾ℓ(z)ρ(y)rk(y) d3y. By the Lebesgue integral triangle inequality and domination [F2], ∣Rk∣≤12Mkℓ2∫B‾ℓ(z)∣ρ∣ d3y≤12Mkℓ2∥ρ∥1.

Remarks

This is a local component estimate. It does not differentiate the remainder or identify it with a force; a tensor estimate requires the stated fixed trivialization and its derivatives.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources