Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Four-momentum components, energy-velocity relation and passive boost transformation in an inertial frame

Statement

Let (A,V,η,C+) be the oriented time-oriented affine Minkowski model (Oriented time-oriented affine Minkowski space (the spacetime primitives)), c>0, and let (o;e0,e1,e2,e3) be an inertial frame with stationary observer n:=e0 (Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model); let En,qn be the observer quantities of Observer energy, spatial momentum, invariant mass, rest energy and kinetic energy of a four-momentum.

(a) For every P∈cl(C+) the coordinate components of P in the frame are (P0,P1,P2,P3)=(En(P)/c, q1,q2,q3), where qn(P)=∑i=13qiei; if P is future timelike then E2=m(P)2c4+c2∑i=13(qi)2 with E=En(P).

(b) Let x:I→A be a C1 future timelike worldline (Curves, regular causal curves and future timelike worldlines in affine Minkowski space) whose chart coordinate path is t↦(ct,r(t)), with coordinate velocity w:=r′ and γw:=(1−∣w∣2/c2)−1/2 (The Euclidean spatial structure and cross product of an inertial frame, Rational powers ar of a positive base); then ∣w∣<c, the four-velocity is U=γw(c,w) by Norms of four-velocity and four-acceleration, and the observer rest-space decomposition,(e), and for P=mU with m>0 constant the components are P=mγw(c,w), that is En(P)=mγwc2 and qn(P)=∑i=13mγwwiei.

(c) Let B(β) be the passive boost of The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta with parameter β=(v/c)s, where v∈R, ∣v∣<c, and s∈R3 is a unit spatial coordinate vector (s⋅s=1), and let P′ denote the components of the same vector P after the coordinate change x′=B(β)x, with B(β) here denoting its frame matrix. Put γv:=(1−v2/c2)−1/2, p:=(P1,P2,P3), p∥:=s⋅p, p∥:=p∥s and p⊥:=p−p∥s, with the same projections defining the primed components. Then

P′0=γv(P0−(v/c) p∥),p∥′=γv(p∥−(v/c)P0s),p⊥′=p⊥,

equivalently E′=γv(E−v p∥), p∥′=γv(p∥−vE/c2), p⊥′=p⊥. The quadratic combination is invariant, E′2−c2∣p′∣2=E2−c2∣p∣2=m(P)2c4 for future timelike P, while for future null P one has E=c∣p∣ and E′=c∣p′∣ in both coordinate systems; in particular the invariant mass is frame-independent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the affine Minkowski model (A,V,η,C+); c>0; an inertial frame (o;e0,e1,e2,e3) with n=e0; P∈cl(C+) for (a); a C1 future timelike worldline x with chart path t↦(ct,r(t)) for (b); a passive boost B(β) with β=(v/c)s, ∣v∣<c, ∣s∣=1, for (c).

[F1]

(Observer energy, spatial momentum, invariant mass, rest energy and kinetic energy of a four-momentum, Definition): for P∈cl(C+), P=(En(P)/c)n+qn(P) is the unique decomposition with qn(P)∈n⊥; for nonzero future causal P, m(P)=−η(P,P)/c; and qn(P) is an element of V, not a coordinate triple.

[F2]

(Positivity, mass shell and kinetic energy of the observer quantities of a four-momentum, Statement): if P is nonzero future causal, then En(P)>0 and η(qn(P),qn(P))=En(P)2/c2+η(P,P); if P is future null, then En(P)=c ∣qn(P)∣; if P is future timelike with invariant mass m(P), then En(P)2=m(P)2c4+c2∣qn(P)∣2; and m(P) depends only on the scalar η(P,P).

[F3]

(Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model, Definition): the inertial chart x sends p to the coordinates relative to (o;e0,…,e3), so a vector of V has components Pa with P=∑a=03Paea.

[F4]

(Norms of four-velocity and four-acceleration, and the observer rest-space decomposition, clause (e)): for a C1 future timelike worldline with chart path t↦(ct,r(t)), coordinate velocity w=r′ and γw=(1−∣w∣2/c2)−1/2, one has ∣w(t)∣<c and U=γw(c,w).

[F5]

(The Euclidean spatial structure and cross product of an inertial frame, Definition): S=span(e1,e2,e3)=e0⊥, the restriction δ of η to S is positive definite, ∣w∣=δ(w,w) is a norm, and with w=∑wiei one has δ(w,z)=w⋅z=∑iwizi and ∣w∣2=∑i(wi)2; the cross product is not used here.

[F6]

(Rational powers ar of a positive base and Laws of rational exponents): for 0≤q<c2 the expression (1−q/c2)−1/2 is a positive real number whose square is (1−q/c2)−1; with q=∣w∣2 this gives γw2(1−∣w∣2/c2)=1 and γw>0 for ∣w∣<c.

[F7]

(The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, Definition): B(β) is the linear map with matrix B00=γ, B0i=Bi0=−γβi and Bij=δji+((γ−1)/∣β∣2)βiβj for β≠0, and B(0)=I, in the basis (e0,e1,e2,e3), where γ=(1−∣β∣2)−1/2.

[F8]

(Transformation of tensor, covector, derivative and current components under affine Lorentz maps, clauses (i) and (vi)): under the coordinate change x′=Λx+b the components of a vector transform as P′a=ΛabPb; for Λ=B(β) this gives P′0=γ(P0−β⋅p) and the displayed spatial formula.

[F9]

(The passive boost is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse B(-beta), clauses (i) and (iii)): B(β) preserves η, is invertible, and maps C+ onto C+.

[F10]

(Lorentz forms of inertia (3,1,0) on a 4-dimensional real vector space, Definition): η is bilinear, so for a vector P=∑aPaea in an η-orthonormal basis, η(P,P)=−(P0)2+∣p∣2 where ∣p∣2=∑i(Pi)2 by [F5].

Proof

technique · read the decomposition of the observer definition in the frame basis, then transform components with the boost matrix and cancel the quadratic combination algebraically
1.1F1F3F5

Since n=e0, the decomposition of [F1] reads P=(En(P)/c)e0+qn(P); as qn(P)∈n⊥=S=span(e1,e2,e3) by [F5], write qn(P)=∑iqiei, so the coordinate components of P in the basis (e0,e1,e2,e3) are (P0,P1,P2,P3)=(En(P)/c,q1,q2,q3) by [F3].

1.2F4F5F6

Under the hypotheses of (b), [F4] gives ∣w∣<c and U=γw(c,w), so the chart components of U are U0=γwc and Ui=γwwi; since wi are the components of w∈S, the norm identity ∣w∣2=∑i(wi)2 of [F5] holds and γw>0 with γw2(1−∣w∣2/c2)=1 by [F6].

1.3F7F8

Under the hypotheses of (c), write p∥:=s⋅p and p⊥:=p−p∥s, so that p=p∥s+p⊥ with s⋅p⊥=0; for v≠0 the boost B(β) with β=(v/c)s has the matrix of [F7] with ∣β∣=∣v∣/c, β⋅p=(v/c)p∥ and ((γv−1)/∣β∣2)(β⋅p)β=(γv−1)p∥s, and [F8] gives P′a=B(β)abPb; hence for v≠0 with ∣v∣<c, p′=p+(γv−1)p∥s−γv(v/c)sP0=p⊥+γv(p∥−(v/c)P0)s and P′0=γv(P0−(v/c)p∥). For v=0, the definition gives B(0)=I and γv=1, so the same two final formulas reduce to p′=p and P′0=P0 without division by ∣β∣2.

2.1F2F5step 1.1

From [step 1.1], ∣qn(P)∣2=∑i(qi)2 by [F5] and En(P)=cP0, so for future timelike P the mass-shell identity of [F2] becomes E2=m(P)2c4+c2∑i(qi)2; this is the second claim of (a).

2.2step 1.1step 1.2

For P=mU with m>0 constant, the components of P are m times those of U, so by [step 1.2] P0=mγwc and Pi=mγwwi; [step 1.1] identifies En(P)=cP0=mγwc2 and qn(P)=∑imγwwiei, which is (b).

2.3F5step 1.1step 1.3

Specialise [step 1.3] and use E=cP0, E′=cP′0 of [step 1.1]: reading the components, E′=γv(E−v p∥) and s⋅p′=γv(p∥−vE/c2) because (v/c)P0=vE/c2, while p⊥′=p⊥ because s⋅p⊥=0; this is the component law of (c).

3.1F2F6F10step 2.3

Invariance of the quadratic combination: with the formulas of [step 2.3], γv2[(E−vp∥)2−c2(p∥−vE/c2)2]=γv2(1−v2/c2)[E2−c2p∥2]=E2−c2p∥2 by γv2(1−v2/c2)=1 from [F6], so E′2−c2∣p′∣2=E2−c2p∥2−c2∣p⊥∣2=E2−c2∣p∣2; by [F10] and [F2] this equals −c2η(P,P)=m(P)2c4 for future timelike P (and 0 for future null P, since η(P,P)=0).

4.1F2F8F9step 3.1

If P is future null, [F2] gives E=c∣p∣ in the unprimed frame. The primed column is [P]′=B(β)[P], the coordinates of the same vector in the primed inertial frame; by [F9] it is nonzero and lies in the future null coordinate cone. Applying [F2] in that frame gives E′>0 and E′=c∣p′∣. The invariant mass depends only on η(P,P), and step 3.1 shows that both frames compute the same quadratic combination. This completes (c).

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 3.1step 4.1∎

Clause (a) is [step 1.1] with [step 2.1], clause (b) is [step 2.2], and clause (c) is [step 2.3] with [step 3.1] and [step 4.1]; hence all assertions of the lemma hold.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources