How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Length-integral invariance under monotone C^1 maps and proper-time invariance under regular increasing maps
Statement
Let , let be a future timelike worldline (Curves, regular causal curves and future timelike worldlines in affine Minkowski space), let with , and let . Let be a strictly increasing surjection, with one-sided endpoint derivatives as in Curves, regular causal curves and future timelike worldlines in affine Minkowski space.
Then , and . Put and . The curve has tangent
which is future timelike exactly where and is the zero vector where . Its nonnegative length integrand
is defined even when is not a worldline, and the broad substitution identity
holds. If at every point, including the one-sided endpoint derivatives, then is a future timelike worldline, its proper-time function of Proper time along a future timelike worldline is defined, and ; more generally for all , so and differ by a base-point constant. No is asserted for a zero-tangent curve outside that definition.
For a strictly decreasing surjection onto one has , and ; the tangent of is past timelike where and zero where , so is not a future timelike worldline, while the nonnegative length integral still equals : oriented substitution gives , and reverses that sign.
These are mathematical curve-integral identities; physical clock reading is a separate premise. No inverse of and no nonvanishing derivative are needed for the broad integral identities.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real ; a future timelike worldline ; reals with ; reals ; a strictly increasing (respectively strictly decreasing) surjection with one-sided endpoint derivatives; the composite ; and .
Curves and reparametrizations (Curves, regular causal curves and future timelike worldlines in affine Minkowski space, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length): a strictly increasing surjection maps endpoints to endpoints, so and (respectively , in the decreasing case); a increasing function has , a decreasing one has ; and the tangent of a curve is the limit of difference quotients over the relevant side.
Chart calculus (Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral): in an inertial chart with coordinate path the frame isomorphism is linear, an -valued curve is differentiable exactly when each coordinate component is, with componentwise derivatives, and its tangent is applied to the coordinate derivative; a map is exactly when all components are .
Chain rule (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with ): for real functions, whenever is differentiable at and at , with the one-sided reading at endpoints.
Bilinearity (Lorentz forms of inertia (3,1,0) on a 4-dimensional real vector space): for real .
Substitution (Substitution: if is differentiable on with integrable and is continuous on an interval containing , then , A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, Proper time along a future timelike worldline): if is differentiable with integrable and is continuous on an order-convex set containing , then ; the derivative of a function on a compact interval is continuous and hence integrable; and is continuous on with as in Proper time along a future timelike worldline.
Proper time (Proper time along a future timelike worldline): for in a worldline's domain, through the oriented integral; is defined only when is a future timelike worldline.
The future and past cones (The timelike set has exactly two convex components, described in orthonormal coordinates, Time orientation, future and past timelike/null/causal vectors, and the closed cones, Timelike, null, spacelike and causal vectors of a Lorentz vector space): in a future -orthonormal basis the future timelike set is and the past timelike set is ; both are closed under multiplication by positive, respectively negative, scalars: for and , and for and .
Continuity of composites (A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions, A composite of continuous functions is continuous, with no side hypothesis of the kind the composition of limits needs, Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function): components of continuous vector-valued maps are continuous, composites of continuous real functions are continuous, and products and sums of continuous real functions are continuous.
Proof
A strictly increasing surjection carries the least point to the least point and the greatest to the greatest point of the target interval, so , and (in the decreasing case) , ; the derivative of a monotone function has the sign of the monotonicity, or , with the one-sided reading at the endpoints.
In an inertial chart, the coordinate path of is ; each component is differentiable with derivative by the chain rule [L3], and the derivatives are continuous by [L8] because and are continuous; hence is with by the componentwise characterisation and linearity of [L2].
Bilinearity [L4] gives , so the nonnegative length integrand is , which equals in the increasing case and in the decreasing case.
At every , is future timelike because ; by the cone description [L7], is future timelike where , is the zero vector where , and is past timelike where .
Since is continuous on , hence integrable, and is continuous on the order-convex containing , substitution [L5] applied to the increasing case gives by [L6]; combined with step 3.1 this proves the broad identity.
Where the tangent is zero, so is not a worldline of Curves, regular causal curves and future timelike worldlines in affine Minkowski space and no proper-time function is defined for it by [L6]; the length integrand of step 3.1 remains defined, which is exactly the content of the broad identity.
In the strictly decreasing case, step 3.2 makes every tangent of past timelike or zero, so is not a future timelike worldline; and substitution [L5] with oriented endpoints gives , which combined with from step 3.1 yields .
If at every point including the one-sided endpoint derivatives, then by step 3.2 every tangent of is future timelike, so is a future timelike worldline and is defined; its endpoint increment is by step 4.1.
For in , substitution [L5] on gives by [L6], so the based functions and differ by the base-point constant.
No step forms an inverse of , divides by , or assumes a derivative-limit hypothesis at the endpoints; and no object is selected from a family, so no choice principle is used.
Remarks
-
The broad identity is the substitution theorem, not a proper-time theorem. The left-hand integrand is the nonnegative square root , which exists for every ; only when is everywhere positive is this integrand the length integrand of an actual worldline , and only then is defined. The zero-tangent case is deliberately separated from the worldline case.
-
Everything is a one-dimensional substitution. The curve enters only through the continuity of and the chain rule for its coordinate components; no derivative-limit hypothesis, no improper integral and no choice principle is used.
Depends on
Proper time along a future timelike worldline
Curves, regular causal curves and future timelike worldlines in affine Minkowski space
Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model
Lorentz forms of inertia (3,1,0) on a 4-dimensional real vector space
Timelike, null, spacelike and causal vectors of a Lorentz vector space
Time orientation, future and past timelike/null/causal vectors, and the closed cones
The timelike set has exactly two convex components, described in orthonormal coordinates
Substitution: if is differentiable on with integrable and is continuous on an interval containing , then
A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions
A composite of continuous functions is continuous, with no side hypothesis of the kind the composition of limits needs
Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function
The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- S. M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997), Chapter 1 pp. 26-27 (PDF pp. 33-34; worldline, proper time (1.97), four-velocity (1.98)-(1.99)) and Chapter 3 pp. 68-71 (PDF pp. 75-78)
- H. S. Reall, Mathematical Tripos Part III General Relativity (Cambridge, October 12, 2022 revision), Section 2.2 pp. 27-28 and Section 2.3 pp. 28-30 (PDF pp. 28-31); Internet Archive copy of the original https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/hsr1000/part3_gr_lectures.pdf
- B. Crowell, Special Relativity, revision 2020-12-10 (author-published undergraduate textbook), Sections 3.5 and 3.7 pp. 60-68; signature (+---) converted to (-+++) and c = 1 formulas converted to x^0 = c t