Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compactly Supported Metric Variation of a Weighted Scalar-Curvature Action

Statement

Let n≥2, let U⊆Rn be open, and let g(s)=(gMN(s,x)), for s in an open interval about 0, be a smooth family of Lorentzian metrics of signature (−+⋯+) on U. Assume g(0)=g, and that g(s)=g outside one compact set K⊂U for every s. Let f∈C∞(U,R) be independent of s, put qMN:=∂sg(s)MN∣s=0, and use the Levi-Civita Christoffel formula and curvature convention

RPQMN=∂MΓPNQ−∂NΓPMQ+ΓPMRΓRNQ−ΓPNRΓRMQ,RQN=RPQPN,R=gQNRQN.

Write w=∣det⁡(gMN)∣, ∇ for the Levi-Civita connection, and □f=gMN∇M∇Nf. The inverse-metric variation changes the density by w˙=−12wgMNqMN. The chart action integral over U of the difference of the two densities is differentiable at s=0, and its first variation is

dds∣0∫U(w(s)fR(s)−wfR) dnx=∫Uw[f(RMN−12gMNR)+gMN□f−∇M∇Nf]qMN dnx.

All integrands in this difference and its derivative have compact support in K. Equivalently, for compactly supported inverse-metric variation q, the bulk coefficient of qMN in the weighted scalar-curvature action is the tensor displayed above. No field equations or physical assumptions are used.

For any smooth compactly supported vector-density components JM on U, the same chart integral convention gives ∫U∂MJM dnx=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth Lorentzian metric family g(s), compact support K, fixed smooth scalar f, and the chart curvature and integral conventions of the Statement.

Connection conventions: Indices range from 1 to n, repeated upper/lower indices are summed, and (gMN) is the inverse of (gMN). The Levi-Civita Christoffel formula means ΓPMN:=12gPQ(∂MgNQ+∂NgMQ−∂QgMN), applied to each g(s). For a scalar a, vector X, and covector α, define ∇Ma:=∂Ma, ∇MXP:=∂MXP+ΓPMQXQ, and ∇MαN:=∂MαN−ΓQMNαQ. Extend to tensors by the product rule and contraction, and set ∇P:=gPM∇M. In particular, ∇M∇Nf=∂M∂Nf−ΓPMN∂Pf.

[F1]

For a differentiable invertible matrix curve A(s), (det⁡A)′=det⁡A tr⁡(A−1A′) (The derivative of the determinant along an invertible C¹ matrix curve: (det⁡A)′=det⁡A  tr⁡(A−1A′)).

[F2]

Every continuous real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm, m≥1, is Riemann integrable (Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable).

[F3]

If f is Riemann integrable on a product of two nondegenerate closed rectangles, then its iterated section integrals in either coordinate block equal the multiple integral whenever the sections are integrable (Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections).

[F4]
[F5]

A continuous map from a compact metric space to a metric space is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous).

[F6]

The Riemann integral on a rectangle is linear and order preserving, and ∣∫Qu∣≤∫Q∣u∣ (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm).

Proof

technique · direct; differentiate the inverse metric, determinant, connection, and curvature, then integrate compactly supported coordinate divergences by Fubini and the fundamental theorem of calculus
1.1givenF1algebra

Put hMN:=∂sg(s)MN∣0. Differentiating g(s)MAg(s)AN=δMN gives qMAgAN+gMAhAN=0, hence hMN=−gMAgNBqAB. The determinant formula [F1] and det⁡(g)<0 give w˙=12wgMNhMN=−12wgMNqMN; the first equality differentiates w=(−det⁡g)1/2, and the second contracts the inverse-variation identity.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

The explicit Christoffel formula gives ΓPMN=ΓPNM and ΓQMNgQP+ΓQMPgNQ=∂MgNP, so ∇g=0. Put CPMN:=∂sΓ(s)PMN∣0. Differentiating metric compatibility gives ∇MhNQ=CRMNgRQ+CRMQgNR. Adding this identity with M,N interchanged and subtracting its version with derivative index Q, the symmetry CPMN=CPNM yields CPMN=12gPQ(∇MhNQ+∇NhMQ−∇QhMN). This is δΓ; its coordinate change law is tensorial because the inhomogeneous connection-transformation term is independent of s. Directly differentiating the coordinate curvature formula gives ∂PδΓPNM−∂NδΓPPM plus the four variations of its quadratic terms. Expanding ∇PδΓPNM−∇NδΓPPM gives the same four terms; the remaining terms cancel as −ΓRPNδΓPRM+ΓRNPδΓPRM=0 by symmetry of the lower connection indices. Thus δRMN=∇PδΓPNM−∇NδΓPPM. With VP:=gMNδΓPMN−gPMδΓNNM, differentiating R=gMNRMN yields δR=RMNqMN+∇PVP.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Substitute hMN=−gMAgNBqAB from step 1.1 into the connection variation from step 2.1 and contract its indices. Writing q:=gMNqMN, direct contraction gives gMNδΓPMN=−∇MqMP+12∇Pq and gPMδΓNNM=−12∇Pq, hence VP=−∇MqMP+∇Pq.

3.2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

By steps 1.1–2.1 and the product rule, δ(wfR)=wf(RMN−12gMNR)qMN+wf∇PVP. This is the pointwise variation of the density before integration by parts.

3.3givenstep 2.1F1algebra

In the explicit Christoffel formula, symmetry of gMQ cancels the ∂MgPQ and −∂QgMP terms after summation, giving ΓMMP=12gMQ∂PgMQ. Apply [F1] along the xP coordinate line and differentiate w=−det⁡g to obtain w−1∂Pw=12gMQ∂PgMQ. Thus w∇PVP=w∂PVP+wΓPPQVQ=∂P(wVP) for the vector V defined in step 2.1.

4.1step 3.1step 3.3F2F3F4F7algebra

Since K is compact in the subspace U⊆Rn, any ambient open cover of K restricts to an open cover in U and has a finite subcover; thus K is compact as a subset of Rn by [F7]. Heine--Borel [F7] makes K closed and bounded. If K≠∅, choose p∈Rn and ρ>0 with K⊂B(p,ρ), and set Q:=∏j=1n[pj−(ρ+1),pj+(ρ+1)]; then K⊂int⁡Q. If K=∅, take any nondegenerate closed coordinate box Q. In either case [F7] makes Q compact. The family of all balls B(p,r) with p∈K and B‾(p,2r)⊂U covers K; compactness gives a finite subcover, whose union has closure in U. The field V has compact support because q and its first derivatives do, by step 3.1. Extend wfVP by zero to Q; it vanishes outside K and near ∂U, so the extension is continuously differentiable. By the chart-integral convention, its integral over Q is the chart integral over U. Each coordinate section is continuously differentiable and compactly supported, so [F2] makes it integrable; [F3] reduces its integral to iterated one-dimensional integrals, and [F4] makes each coordinate integral of ∂P(wfVP) zero at the endpoints. The identical argument proves the Statement's divergence-integral identity for any compactly supported smooth vector-density JP. Using step 3.3 and the product rule for f∂P(wVP) gives ∫Uwf∇PVP dnx=−∫Uw(∇Pf)VP dnx.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1F2F3F4algebra

Substitute VP=−∇MqMP+∇Pq from step 3.1 into the integration-by-parts identity in step 4.1. Integrating its two terms by parts by the same compact-support argument gives −∫Uw(∇Pf)VP dnx=∫Uw[−(∇M∇Nf)qMN+gMN(□f)qMN]dnx; the Hessian is symmetric because f is a scalar and the connection is torsion-free.

6.1givenstep 3.2step 4.1step 5.1F2F4F5F6F7algebra∎

Let Q be the closed box from step 4.1 and choose a nondegenerate closed parameter interval J about 0 contained in the open parameter domain of g(s). On J×Q, define a(s,x)=w(s)fR(s)−wfR by its formula for x∈U and by zero for x∉U. The density difference and its s-derivative are supported in K⊂U and vanish near ∂U by step 4.1, so both extend smoothly by zero. By the chart-integral convention, the action difference over U equals ∫Qa(s,x) dnx. The product J×Q is a closed coordinate box and is compact by [F7]. Hence ∂sa is uniformly continuous there by [F5]. For each fixed x, t↦∂ta(t,x) is continuous, hence integrable on every closed subinterval of J by [F2]. Since a(0,x)=0, for s>0 the fundamental theorem [F4] on [0,s] gives a(s,x)/s=s−1∫0s∂ta(t,x) dt; for s<0, [F4] on [s,0] gives a(s,x)/s=∣s∣−1∫s0∂ta(t,x) dt. Thus in either case the quotient is an average of ∂ta(t,x) over the segment joining 0 to s. Uniform continuity implies that for every ε>0, all sufficiently small ∣s∣ satisfy sup⁡x∈Q∣a(s,x)/s−∂sa(0,x)∣<ε. By [F6], the absolute difference of the rectangle integrals is at most ε times its volume. Thus the difference quotients of the action integrals converge to the integral of ∂sa(0,⋅). Combining that derivative with steps 3.2 and 5.1 proves the stated differentiability and first-variation formula.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources