Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compactly Supported Metric Directions Stay Lorentzian for Small Amplitude

Statement

Let M be a smooth ten-manifold and G a smooth Lorentzian metric of signature (−+⋯+), meaning inertia (9,1,0). If h is any smooth symmetric covariant 2-tensor with compact support, there is ϵ>0 such that G+sh is Lorentzian with the same signature for every ∣s∣<ϵ. Consequently, every smooth compactly supported symmetric inverse-metric direction qMN is realized by a smooth family of Lorentzian metrics with ∂sG(s)MN∣0=qMN.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth ten-dimensional Lorentzian metric G, its signature (−+⋯+), and the compactly supported smooth symmetric tensor h, or the inverse-metric direction q.

[F4]

For a square real matrix A∈Mm(R), m≥1, the determinant is the finite Leibniz sum of signed products of matrix entries, and the entries of the adjugate are signed determinants of deleted-row-and-column minors. When det⁡A≠0, this real number is a unit of R, with reciprocal 1/det⁡A, so the adjugate formula gives A−1=(det⁡A)−1adj⁡(A) (For n≥1, the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and ∣det⁡A∣ for a real matrix, Deleted-row-and-column minors, cofactors, the cofactor matrix and the adjugate over a commutative ring, If det⁡(A) is a unit, then A−1=det⁡(A)−1adj⁡(A)).

[F5]

On an open subset of Rm, the smoothness convention requires every finite ordered coordinate partial derivative to exist and be jointly continuous, including the word of length zero (Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).

[F6]

On an open real coordinate interval, differentiable functions obey the sum and product rules and the quotient rule wherever the denominator is nonzero (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0). This is used only for derivatives along one coordinate line; joint continuity is proved directly below.

Proof

technique · direct; prove pointwise openness of the Lorentzian matrices, make the amplitude uniform over the compact support, and differentiate the inverse relation
1.1F1algebra

By [F1], any Lorentzian form on a ten-dimensional vector space has a basis with matrix D=diag⁡(−1,1,…,1). Let a symmetric form in this basis have matrix D+E, where max⁡a,b∣Eab∣<1/18. For v=∑a=19vaea in the positive coordinate subspace, (D+E)(v,v)≥∣v∣2−max⁡∣Eab∣(∑a=19∣va∣)2≥(1−9max⁡∣Eab∣)∣v∣2>0. Also (D+E)(e0,e0)=−1+E00<0. Thus the form is positive on a 9-dimensional subspace W and negative on the line spanned by e0. By [F1], write its inertia normal form as diag⁡(Ip,−Iq,0r), where p+q+r=10. Projection from W to the p positive coordinates is injective: a nonzero vector in its kernel would have quadratic value at most zero, contrary to positivity on W; hence p≥9. Projection from the negative line to the q negative coordinates is also injective, since a vector supported only in positive and zero coordinates has nonnegative quadratic value; hence q≥1. Therefore p=9,q=1,r=0. This proves that the Lorentzian forms form an open subset of the symmetric matrices near D. An invertible change of basis acts by an invertible linear congruence map on the space of symmetric matrices, so this open-set conclusion holds near every Lorentzian matrix in every basis.

1.2F5F6algebra

We first prove the required algebra on an arbitrary open U⊆Rm, with continuity understood jointly in all coordinates. If u,v:U→R are continuous at z0, write u0=u(z0) and v0=v(z0). For any η>0, their joint continuity gives one neighborhood where ∣u−u0∣<η and ∣v−v0∣<η. On this neighborhood, ∣(u+v)−(u0+v0)∣<2η; if η≤1, then ∣uv−u0v0∣≤∣u∣ ∣v−v0∣+∣v0∣ ∣u−u0∣<(∣u0∣+1+∣v0∣)η. Choosing η small proves joint continuity of sums and products. If v0≠0, additionally require ∣v−v0∣<∣v0∣/2, so ∣v∣>∣v0∣/2 and ∣v−1−v0−1∣≤2∣v−v0∣/∣v0∣2; this proves joint continuity of the reciprocal on its nonzero domain, and products give quotients. These arguments use neighborhoods in U, not separate continuity along lines. For smooth inputs, restrict to an open interval in one coordinate direction and apply [F6]. Induction on the length of an ordered derivative word writes every derivative of a finite sum or product as a finite sum of products of input derivatives. For a nowhere-zero smooth v, the formula ∂i(v−1)=−v−2∂iv and the same induction write every derivative of v−1 as a finite sum of products of derivatives of v divided by positive integer powers of v. Each such expression is jointly continuous by [F5] and the joint-continuity estimates just proved. Thus finite sums, products, and quotients with nonvanishing smooth denominators are smooth on U in the exact ordered-partial sense of [F5].

2.1step 1.1F3F5algebra

Let K=supp⁡h. If K=∅, then G+sh=G for every s. Otherwise define C to be the set of all tuples (p,φ,V,δ,B) such that p∈K, (V,φ) is a smooth chart with p∈V, δ,B>0, the maximum-entry ball of radius δ around the coordinate matrix G(p) consists of Lorentzian forms, and throughout V one has ∥G(x)−G(p)∥max⁡<δ/2 and ∥h(x)∥max⁡<B. Step 1.1 and continuity imply that for every p∈K at least one such tuple exists. Thus the chart neighborhoods occurring in C form an open cover of K; this is the family of all admissible tuples, not a pointwise choice function. By [F3] there is a finite subcover with tuples (pj,φj,Vj,δj,Bj), 1≤j≤N. Set ϵ:=min⁡1≤j≤Nδj/(2(1+Bj))>0. If x∈Vj and ∣s∣<ϵ, then ∥G(x)+sh(x)−G(pj)∥max⁡<δj, so G(x)+sh(x) is Lorentzian in that chart. These neighborhoods cover K, and off K the metric is unchanged.

3.1givenstep 2.1step 1.2F4F5F6algebra∎

Given compactly supported smooth symmetric qMN, set hMN:=−GMAGNBqAB; step 1.2 in a manifold chart makes this tensor smooth, and it is symmetric and compactly supported. By step 2.1, G(s):=G+sh is Lorentzian for small ∣s∣. On an open parameter-chart domain U⊆R×R10, the functions GMN(x) and hMN(x) lift smoothly: their ordered x derivatives are pulled back by the continuous coordinate projection, and any derivative in s is zero. The coordinate function s is smooth, so step 1.2 makes every entry of A(s,x):=(G(s)MN(x)) jointly smooth. By [F4], its determinant and adjugate entries are finite polynomials in these entries and hence smooth by step 1.2. Lorentzian nondegeneracy gives det⁡A≠0 throughout U, so that same result makes (det⁡A)−1adj⁡(A)=A−1 jointly smooth. Differentiate G(s)MAG(s)AN=δMN in s at zero using [F6] to obtain ∂sG(s)MN∣0=−GMAGNBhAB=qMN. This is the required smooth Lorentzian family.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources