Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Second-order curvature tests on an affine feasible slice

Statement

Let d≥0 and k≥0 be integers, let U⊆Rd be open and convex, let A:Rd→Rk be linear, let b∈Rk, and let x∗∈U satisfy Ax∗=b. Put T=ker⁡A. Assume f:U→R is differentiable and has second directional derivatives represented by a continuous matrix field: there is a continuous map H:U→Rd×d with symmetric values, and for every x∈U and h∈Rd,

d2dt2f(x+th)∣t=0=Qx(h):=hTH(x)h.

Assume stationarity Df(x∗)h=0 for every h∈T. If Qx∗(h0)<0 for some h0∈T, then x∗ is not a local minimum of f on {x∈U:Ax=b}. If Qx∗(h)>0 for every nonzero h∈T, then x∗ is a strict local minimum on that feasible slice. If T={0}, the latter conclusion holds because x∗ is the only feasible point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open convex domain, linear constraint, differentiable function, continuous symmetric matrix field, directional second-derivative identity, and stationarity in the Statement.

[F1]

A convex subset of Rm contains every line segment between two of its points: the segment between two points of a convex set stays in that set.

[L1]

The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn: the Euclidean norm is ∥h∥2=⟨h,h⟩.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1algebra

If d=0, then R0 has only its zero vector, U={x∗}, and T={0}. There is no negative-curvature direction and x∗ is the only feasible point, so the strict-minimum conclusion holds. In the remaining argument suppose d≥1. Suppose h0∈T and Qx∗(h0)<0. Set ϕ(t)=f(x∗+th0) for t near 0. Openness of U permits this definition; stationarity gives ϕ′(0)=0. The identity in the Statement gives ϕ′′(t)=Qx∗+th0(h0) wherever defined, and continuity of the entries of H makes this negative for every sufficiently small t≥0.

1.2L1L2L3L4given

Suppose T≠{0} and Qx∗(h)>0 for each nonzero h∈T. The unit sphere ST={h∈T:∥h∥2=1} is nonempty, closed by [L2] and continuity of the norm, and bounded; [L3] makes it compact. The quadratic polynomial h↦hTH(x∗)h is continuous, so [L4] gives λ=min⁡h∈STQx∗(h)>0.

2.1L5step 1.1algebra

Choose such a small t>0. Applying [L5] to ϕ′ on [0,t] gives ϕ′(t)−ϕ′(0)=tϕ′′(s)<0 for some s∈(0,t), hence ϕ′(t)<0; the same argument applies to every positive endpoint up to t. Applying [L5] to ϕ on [0,t] gives ϕ(t)−ϕ(0)=tϕ′(r)<0 for some r∈(0,t). Since h0∈ker⁡A, x∗+th0 is feasible, so x∗ is not a local minimum.

2.2F1L1step 1.2givenalgebra

By continuity of the finitely many entries of H, choose δ>0 so that ∥x−x∗∥2<δ implies ∣Qx(h)−Qx∗(h)∣<λ/2 for every unit vector h: expand the difference as a finite sum of entry differences times hihj, each with ∣hihj∣≤1. If y≠x∗ is feasible and ∥y−x∗∥2<δ, put v=y−x∗. Then v∈T, and convexity of U keeps x∗+tv in U for 0≤t≤1. For ϕ(t)=f(x∗+tv), stationarity gives ϕ′(0)=0, while homogeneity of the quadratic form gives ϕ′′(t)=Qx∗+tv(v)≥(λ/2)∥v∥22>0.

3.1L5step 2.2algebra∎

For any t∈(0,1], [L5] applied to ϕ′ on [0,t] yields ϕ′(t)−ϕ′(0)=tϕ′′(s)>0 for some s∈(0,t), so ϕ′(t)>0. Applying [L5] to ϕ on [0,1] gives ϕ(1)−ϕ(0)=ϕ′(r)>0 for some r∈(0,1). Thus every distinct feasible y with ∥y−x∗∥2<δ has f(y)>f(x∗). If T={0}, Ay=Ax∗ implies y−x∗∈T={0}, so x∗ is the only feasible point.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources