Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact quasistatic and finite-interval mass-change bounds

Statement

Assume ACω as defined by The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Let G,c,ℏ,η,M0,Mmin⁡>0 be the relevant constants and initial/cutoff data of Exact ideal emitter mass ODE and entropy accounting, with 0<η≤1 and 0<Mmin⁡<M0. Let

M(t∞)=(M03−3αt∞)1/3,α=ηℏc415360πG2,τ=M03−Mmin⁡33α

be the positive solution and cutoff supplied by that proposition. Use the diagnostic of Quasistatic diagnostic for the ideal emitter model. Then

ϵqs(t∞)=2Gαc3M(t∞)2≤2Gαc3Mmin⁡2.

For any ϵ0>0, the condition Mmin⁡2≥2Gα/(c3ϵ0) therefore implies ϵqs(t∞)≤ϵ0 throughout [0,τ].

There is also an exact finite-interval bound. If 0≤t∞≤t∞+Δt≤τ and

δ:=3αΔtM(t∞)3≤12,

then

M(t∞+Δt)M(t∞)=(1−δ)1/3,∣M(t∞+Δt)M(t∞)−1∣≤22/33 δ.

Both bounds are exact internal consequences of the adopted ODE. They give no error bound between that ODE and an unconstructed Einstein–quantum backreaction solution.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the fixed-reference ODE, its positive solution, the cutoff and constants of Exact ideal emitter mass ODE and entropy accounting, with 0<Mmin⁡<M0, 0<η≤1, and α>0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): ACω means every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function; this is the exact choice assumption carried by the mathematical photon-flux supplier.

[F1]

Exact ideal emitter mass ODE and entropy accounting: its Statement defines rH=2GM/c2, α=ηℏc4/(15360πG2), and the exact positive solution M(t∞)=(M03−3αt∞)1/3 until Mmin⁡>0.

[F2]

Quasistatic diagnostic for the ideal emitter model: tcross=rH(M(t∞))/c and ϵqs=∣M′∣tcross/M; the latter is a dimensionless ODE diagnostic only.

[F3]

The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a): if a function is continuous on a closed interval and differentiable in its interior, its endpoint difference equals its derivative at an interior point times the interval length.

Proof

Given: A positive solution M of the stated ODE on [0,τ], positive G,c,α, and the definitions in [F1]–[F2].

1.1givenA1F1F2algebra

Differentiate the exact solution in [F1] on 0≤t∞≤τ; since M(t∞)>0, this gives M′=−α/M2. Also [F1] gives rH=2GM/c2, so substituting these identities and tcross=rH/c into [F2] yields

ϵqs=(α/M2)(2GM/c3)M=2Gαc3M2.

All factors are positive on the interval.

1.2givenA1F1algebra

From [F1], M(t∞+Δt)3=M(t∞)3−3αΔt. Divide by the positive M(t∞)3 and take positive cube roots to get M(t∞+Δt)/M(t∞)=(1−δ)1/3.

2.1givenA1step 1.1algebra

Since M(t∞)≥Mmin⁡>0, one has M(t∞)−2≤Mmin⁡−2. The formula in step 1.1 gives the uniform upper bound; if Mmin⁡2≥2Gα/(c3ϵ0), multiplying by the positive denominator yields ϵqs≤ϵ0.

3.1givenA1F3step 1.2algebra∎

If δ=0, step 1.2 gives a ratio of one and the bound is equality. If 0<δ≤1/2, h(x)=(1−x)1/3 is continuous on [0,δ], differentiable on its interior, and satisfies ∣h′(x)∣=13(1−x)−2/3≤22/3/3. Apply [F3] on this nondegenerate interval and use h(0)=1 to obtain ∣h(δ)−1∣≤(22/3/3)δ. Step 1.2 gives the claimed ratio bound.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources