Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Perfect sound characteristic and actual stable causal linear branch

Statement

Fix c>0 and take M=R4 with global length coordinates (x0,x1,x2,x3)=(ct,x), metric η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), and future causal cone {V∈R4:V0≥0, ηabVaVb≤0}. For V=(V0,V)∈R4 with V0>0, define its coordinate velocity by v(V):=cV/V0. Since η(V,V)=(V0)2(∣v(V)∣2/c2−1), membership in this cone is equivalent to ∣v(V)∣≤c, with equality on its nonzero null boundary. The zero vector belongs to the cone but has no coordinate velocity under this definition. The constant rest observer is uˉ=(1,0,0,0).

Let X⊂(0,∞)×R be open, let e∈C2(X;R), and fix (v0,σp0)∈X. Define n0:=1/v0, ϵ0:=n0e(v0,σp0), p0:=−ev(v0,σp0), T0:=eσp(v0,σp0), and h0:=ϵ0+p0. Assume n0,T0,h0,evv>0, with evv evaluated at fixed σp. A first variation is defined by a family of state maps (vλ,σp,λ):M→X and fields uλ:M→R4, jointly smooth in dimensionless λ near 0 and in x, with the displayed reference state and uˉ as their constant λ=0 values and with η(uλ,uλ)=−1, uλ0>0. For any such field fλ, write δf:=∂λfλ∣λ=0; put r:=δϵ, w:=(δu1,δu2,δu3), and impose the adiabatic first-variation condition δσp=0. The linearized equations mean the first variations at λ=0 of the no-force balances ∂aTλab=0 and ∂aJλa=0, with nλ=1/vλ, ϵλ=nλe(vλ,σp,λ), pλ=−ev(vλ,σp,λ), Δλab=ηab+uλauλb, Tλab=ϵλuλauλb+pλΔλab, and Jλa=nλuλa; no member with λ≠0 is required to solve the nonlinear balances. Differentiating η(uλ,uλ)=−1 gives δu0=0.

The local Gibbs identity of Local Gibbs, Euler, parcel first law and response identities gives

as:=(∂p∂ϵ)σp=evv(v0,σp0)n0h0,

and assume additionally as≤1. In the adopted units, c has units m s−1, r and h0 have units Pa, and w and as are dimensionless. Since x0=ct and uˉ=∂x0, the first variations of the no-force perfect-fluid projection equations of Perfect stress and particle balances with entropy identity are

rt+ch0div⁡w=0,wt+cash0∇r=0.

For initial data U0=(r0,w0) whose real components belong componentwise to S(R3) as defined by Schwartz space and its seminorms, or for smooth periodic data on TL3 with L>0, these equations have the unique global smooth solution supplied by Complete symmetrized constant-coefficient evolution. The positive quadratic energy density E=12[(as/h0)r2+h0∣w∣2] has flux casrw, and the solution is contractive in the corresponding weighted L2 and Sobolev norms. Its characteristic speeds are 0 and ±cas; for positive as, this propagation cone lies inside the Minkowski reference cone exactly when as≤1. These are statements about this frozen linear system only; they do not assert a nonlinear or curved-spacetime evolution theorem.

For the formal coefficient comparison in [A3], if the same linear equations are assigned as>1, their plane-wave speed is cas>c. If they are assigned as<0, smooth periodic modes grow as ec−as∣k∣t at arbitrarily large wave numbers. The case as=0 is degenerate: the displayed positive energy matrix is no longer positive definite, so the stability proof above does not apply.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The reference state, first-variation convention, Minkowski geometry, and coefficient hypotheses in the Statement.

[A1]

The reference speed condition as≤1 is an additional hypothesis for the causal branch, not a consequence of evv>0 or h0>0.

[A2]

Countable choice ACω is carried by the geometric and Fourier suppliers; no stronger choice principle is assumed (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[A3]

For the coefficient comparisons in the final paragraph only, consider the same two displayed linear equations with h0,c>0 and as∈R. These are coefficient-only comparisons, not claims that the parameters are realized by a material: as>1 drops the causal-branch hypothesis as≤1, and as<0 also drops the positive-response hypothesis evv>0.

[F1]

Perfect stress and particle balances with entropy identity (current batch-55 draft): for the smooth (−,+,+,+) Lorentzian data and fixed-composition state, ∇aTab=0 and ∇a(nua)=0 imply Dϵ+hθ=0, haaccb+Δba∇ap=0, and Dn+nθ=0. Its proof is conditional on the current draft state and Gibbs carriers; no independent proof acceptance is inferred.

[F2]

Local Gibbs, Euler, parcel first law and response identities (current batch-53 draft): for an open state domain and e∈C2(X), it gives dϵ=T ds+μ dn and h=Ts+μn. At fixed σp, ∂nϵ=h/n and ∂np=evv/n2; when evv>0 and h>0, as=evv/(nh)>0. This use is conditional on those hypotheses and the current draft Gibbs carrier; authoring readiness does not establish proof acceptance.

[F3]

Complete symmetrized constant-coefficient evolution: for constant matrices with positive symmetrizer M, symmetric MAj, and nonnegative symmetrized damping, the system has a unique global smooth solution for componentwise real Schwartz or smooth periodic data, with contraction and finite propagation at the largest absolute eigenvalue of M1/2A(ν)M−1/2 over unit directions.

[F4]

Schwartz space and its seminorms: scalar Schwartz functions are smooth complex-valued functions with every seminorm sup⁡x∣xα∂βf(x)∣ finite; the Statement uses the componentwise real-valued subspace for vector data.

Proof

1.1A2F1F2givenalgebra

The family is normalized by η(uλ,uλ)=−1 and is future-directed, so at λ=0 it has u0=uˉ and differentiating normalization gives δu0=0. Since ∂0=c−1∂t, the first variation of Dϵ is c−1rt, that of θ is div⁡w, and that of the spatial acceleration is c−1∂tw. By [F2], δp=asr and δn=(n0/h0)r. Taking first variations of the energy and spatial equations in [F1] therefore gives rt+ch0div⁡w=0 and wt+(cas/h0)∇r=0; the particle equation follows from δn=(n0/h0)r and the first equation.

2.1A2F3step 1.1algebraF4

Put U=(r,w) and M=diag⁡(as/h0,h0I3). The matrix M is positive definite because as,h0>0. For each j, define Aj by (Aj)r,wj=ch0, (Aj)wj,r=cas/h0, with all other entries zero. Then MAj is symmetric. In a unit direction ν, the longitudinal block of A(ν) on (r,w⋅ν) has eigenvalues ±cas and the two transverse components have eigenvalue 0. Thus [F3] constructs the actual global smooth solution and yields its uniqueness, contraction, and propagation speed cas.

3.1A1step 2.1algebra

Direct multiplication of the equations by (as/h0)r and h0w gives ∂tE+div⁡(casrw)=0. For a unit normal ν, ∣casr w⋅ν∣≤cas E by 2XY≤X2+Y2 with X=as/h0∣r∣ and Y=h0∣w∣. Since 0<as≤1, this flux cone lies inside the reference cone of speed c.

4.1A3algebra∎

Under the formal coefficient convention [A3], for k≠0 and as>0, r=Acos⁡(k⋅x−ωt), w=(ωA/(ch0∣k∣2))kcos⁡(k⋅x−ωt) solves both equations when ω2=c2as∣k∣2; substitution gives both equalities. Hence as>1 has exact modes with speed greater than c. If as<0, put λ=c−as∣k∣ and take r=Aeλtcos⁡(k⋅x), w=−(λA/(ch0∣k∣2))keλtsin⁡(k⋅x); differentiating verifies both equations and gives unbounded growth rates as ∣k∣→∞. At as=0 the weight as/h0 vanishes, so the positive-definite argument in step 2.1 is inapplicable.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources