Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Supplied static finite-mode Fermi occupation identity

Statement

This is a finite-mode conditional construction. Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the exact current interface for the batch-45 draft Explicit diagonal Fock domains and occupation trace, whose Statement matches its planned manifest entry on qsm-bose-fermi-gases. Its current carrier has a complete authored proof and precheck, plus a Step-1 ready authoring record; those records do not assert independent review approval. Let J={1,…,M} be a nonempty finite set of supplied modes, let m,c>0, let Nj>0 be supplied dimensionless lapse values, and let p^j∈R3 be supplied mode momenta. Put ϵj=m2c4+c2∣p^j∣2,Ej=Njϵj,HF=C2M, with occupation basis ∣n1,…,nM⟩, nj∈{0,1}, and diagonal operators H∣n⟩=(∑jEjnj)∣n⟩, N∣n⟩=(∑jnj)∣n⟩. For βK>0 and finite μK∈R, conditional on that exact supplier result, ΞF=Tr⁡e−βK(H−μKN)=∏j=1M(1+e−βK(Ej−μK))<∞, and the normalized diagonal state has occupation mean E[nj]=1eβK(Ej−μK)+1. With βj=βKNj and μj=μK/Nj, this is exactly E[nj]=1eβj(ϵj−μj)+1. No arbitrary curved-space Dirac spectrum or self-consistent quantum-gravity state is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite supplied mode set, positive finite mode energies, βK>0, μK∈R, positive lapse values, and the named conditional supplier interface.

[A1]

The current batch-45 draft supplier Explicit diagonal Fock domains and occupation trace assumes ACω; for fermionic modes it assumes qj>0, ∑jqj<∞, and only finitely many gaps ϵj−μ are negative, and concludes ΞF=Tr⁡Gβ,μ=∏j(1+qj)<∞ with normalized diagonal state whose finite-mode occupation probabilities are P(nj=1)=qj/(1+qj). Its exact current Statement matches the planned batch-45 manifest; its authored proof and precheck are present and its Step-1 record says ready, but this is not independent review approval. For our finite set the summability and negative-gap hypotheses hold automatically. We apply the supplier with its mode energy set equal to {Ej} and its chemical potential equal to μK; its interface also allows countably many modes under the stated conditions. (Explicit diagonal Fock domains and occupation trace)

[A2]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, ACω, is the stated assumption used by the current batch-45 QSM draft supplier. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

Proof

1.1givenA1A2

For each finite mode, Ej−μK is real and finite, so qj=e−βK(Ej−μK)>0. A finite family of positive numbers has finite sum, and it has only finitely many negative energy gaps. Therefore the finite-mode hypotheses of [A1] hold under [A2]; conditional on the supplier's stated result, which is not independently approved here, it gives the exact trace product and normalized diagonal state.

1.2A1algebra

The supplier's finite fermion marginal is E[nj]=qj/(1+qj)=1/(eβK(Ej−μK)+1) by substituting qj. Since Ej=Njϵj, this exponent is βK(Njϵj−μK).

2.1givenstep 1.2algebra∎

The definitions βj=βKNj and μj=μK/Nj give βj(ϵj−μj)=βK(Njϵj−μK). Substitution proves the displayed local-parameter form exactly for each supplied mode. The statement uses only this finite regulator and makes no claim about an unprovided continuum mode spectrum.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources