Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weighted half-tail contractions for qn=Msn(qn−1,qn+1) give a unique C1 curve with tangent slope bounded by c/(1−q)

Statement

Let θ∈(0,1), c>0 and put

q:=c (θ+θ−1),and assume q<1.

Let J⊆R be a nonempty compact interval, let s∈X±, and let O⊆R2 be open with J×J⊆O. For u∈{−1,+1} let M~u:O→R be of class C2 (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms); write Mu for its restriction to J×J, assume Mu(J×J)⊆J, and suppose that

∣∂1Mu∣≤c,∣∂2Mu∣≤con J×J.

Let (yn)n≥0 be a sequence with yn∈J and let b∗∈J satisfy

yn=Msn(yn−1,yn+1)(n≥1),y0=Ms0(b∗,y1),

and assume there is ρˉ>0 with [yn−ρˉ, yn+ρˉ]⊆J for every n≥0. Choose δ∗>0 such that

[b∗−δ∗, b∗+δ∗]⊆J,δ∗<(1−q)ρˉc,

and put I:=(b∗−δ∗,b∗+δ∗). Write

ℓθ∞(N):={ u:N→R : ∥u∥θ:=sup⁡n≥0θ−n∣un∣<∞ }

with metric ∥u−v∥θ, and define its closed ball

Bρˉ:={u∈ℓθ∞(N):∥u∥θ≤ρˉ}.

For u∈Bρˉ and b∈I, put z−1:=b and zk:=yk+uk for every k≥0, and define Tb:Bρˉ→Bρˉ by

(Tbu)n:=Msn(zn−1,zn+1)−yn(n≥0).

Then:

  1. ℓθ∞(N) is a complete metric space and Bρˉ is complete in the distance ∥u−v∥θ; for every b∈I the map Tb is a contraction with constant q<1, so it has exactly one fixed point u(b)∈Bρˉ;
  2. for every b∈I one has the a priori bound ∥u(b)∥θ≤c ∣b−b∗∣/(1−q), and the map b↦u(b) is Lipschitz on I with

∥u(b′)−u(b)∥θ≤c1−q ∣b′−b∣;

  1. b↦u(b) is continuously differentiable on I into ℓθ∞(N): with zk∗:=yk+uk(b) for k≥0 and z−1∗:=b, the derivative d(b):=du(b)/db∈ℓθ∞(N) is the unique element of ℓθ∞(N) satisfying

dn(b)=∂1Msn(zn−1∗,zn+1∗) dn−1(b)+∂2Msn(zn−1∗,zn+1∗) dn+1(b)(n≥1),

d0(b)=∂1Ms0(b,z1∗)+∂2Ms0(b,z1∗) d1(b),d−1(b):=1,

and ∥d(b)∥θ≤c/(1−q); 4. consequently the local phase curve

γ(b):=(b,  y0+u0(b))

defined for b∈I is C1 with γ′(b)=(1,d0(b)), and so ∣d0(b)∣≤c/(1−q).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameters θ,c,q, the compact interval J, the open neighborhood O, the C2 extensions M~−1,M~+1 and their restrictions M−1,M+1, the two-sign sequence s, the reference data y,b∗, the radius ρˉ and parameter interval I, the weighted space ℓθ∞(N), its closed ball Bρˉ, and the operators Tb.

[F1]

Each M~u is C2 on the open set O, its restriction maps J×J into J, and ∣∂1Mu∣,∣∂2Mu∣≤c on J×J (given). The box J×J is compact by Heine--Borel; hence the first and second partial derivatives are bounded there (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case). If z,z′∈J×J and Δ:=z′−z, the segment z+tΔ lies in J×J. The function g(t):=M~u(z+tΔ) is C2 on an open interval containing [0,1], and the chain rule gives ∣g′(t)∣≤c∥Δ∥1 and ∣g′′(t)∣≤K∥Δ∥12 with a common finite K for both signs (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)). The mean-value inequality (The mean value inequality: if f:[a,b]→Rm is continuous and differentiable on (a,b) with ∥f′∥2≤M, then ∥f(b)−f(a)∥2≤M(b−a)) applied to g gives

∣Mu(z′)−Mu(z)∣≤c∥z′−z∥1,

For the Taylor remainder, the mean-value inequality applied to g′ on [0,t] gives ∣g′(t)−g′(0)∣≤Kt∥Δ∥12; thus ϕ(t):=g(t)−g(0)−tg′(0) has ∣ϕ′(t)∣≤K∥Δ∥12. Applying the same inequality to ϕ on [0,1] gives

∣Mu(z′)−Mu(z)−DMu(z)(z′−z)∣≤K ∥z′−z∥12.

[F2]

The map W:ℓθ∞(N)→ℓ∞(N), (Wu)n:=θ−nun, is a bijection with ∥Wu∥∞=∥u∥θ; hence (ℓθ∞(N),∥⋅−⋅∥θ) is a complete metric space, as an isometric copy of the complete space ℓ∞(N)=B(N). It maps Bρˉ isometrically onto the closed sup-norm ball Bρˉ(N), so that ball and therefore Bρˉ are complete as well (The bounded functions on a set form a complete metric space in the supremum metric, and the coding map of the two-sign shift space is an isometry, clauses 1, 2 and 4; Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset, Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).

[F3]

Banach's fixed point theorem (A contraction of a nonempty complete metric space into itself has exactly one fixed point, the limit of the iterates from any starting point, Lipschitz map, α-Hölder map for rational 0<α≤1, and contraction): a map of a nonempty complete metric space into itself with constant q<1 has exactly one fixed point, and it is the limit of the iterates from every starting point.

[F4]

Absolute value and order arithmetic (Absolute value in an ordered field, Basic properties of the absolute value, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)): ∣uv∣=∣u∣∣v∣, ∣u+w∣≤∣u∣+∣w∣, and θ−n>0 for all n.

Proof

technique · direct; contract in the weighted supremum norm, estimate the boundary forcing, and linearise by a Taylor remainder estimate in the same norm
1.1givenF1F4algebra

Contraction: let u,v∈Bρˉ and b∈I. Every argument pair of Msn lies in J×J: b∈J and, for k≥0, ∣uk∣,∣vk∣≤ρˉ with [yk−ρˉ,yk+ρˉ]⊆J. The line segment between the two argument pairs also lies in J×J because J is an interval, so the derivative bound in [F1] gives for n≥1 ∣(Tbu)n−(Tbv)n∣≤c(∣un−1−vn−1∣+∣un+1−vn+1∣)≤θn c(θ−1+θ) ∥u−v∥θ=θn q ∥u−v∥θ. For n=0 only the argument z1 varies, so ∣(Tbu)0−(Tbv)0∣≤c∣u1−v1∣≤q∥u−v∥θ because cθ≤q. Multiplying by θ−n and taking the supremum gives ∥Tbu−Tbv∥θ≤q∥u−v∥θ.

2.1givenstep 1.1F1F4algebra

Ball invariance: let b∈I and u∈Bρˉ. For every k≥0, zk=yk+uk∈J by ∣uk∣≤ρˉ and the margin hypothesis; also z−1=b∈J. For n≥1, using the reference recurrence of the statement and [F1], ∣(Tbu)n∣=∣Msn(zn−1,zn+1)−Msn(yn−1,yn+1)∣≤c(∣un−1∣+∣un+1∣)≤θnq ∥u∥θ≤θnqρˉ. For n=0, (Tbu)0=Ms0(b,z1)−Ms0(b∗,y1), so ∣(Tbu)0∣≤c∣b−b∗∣+c∣u1∣≤(1−q)ρˉ+qρˉ=ρˉ, since ∣b−b∗∣<δ∗<(1−q)ρˉ/c. Hence ∥Tbu∥θ≤ρˉ.

2.2givenstep 1.1F1F3F4

Linearised equation: fix b and put zk∗:=yk+uk(b) for k≥0 and z−1∗:=b. Define the affine map L on ℓθ∞(N) by (Ld)n:=∂1Msn(zn−1∗,zn+1∗) dn−1+∂2Msn(zn−1∗,zn+1∗) dn+1(n≥1),(Ld)0:=∂2Ms0(b,z1∗) d1+∂1Ms0(b,z1∗), where d−1:=1 is held fixed. The homogeneous part d↦Ld−d−1-part is a contraction of constant q by the computation of step 1.1, so [F3] gives a unique d(b)∈ℓθ∞(N) with Ld(b)=d(b), i.e. the displayed system; taking the fixed point of the homogeneous contraction started at 0 gives ∥d(b)∥θ≤c/(1−q) because the forcing ∂1Ms0(b,z1∗)e0 has norm at most c.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2F3

Fixed point: by [F2], Bρˉ is a nonempty complete metric space. For every b∈I, step 2.1 shows Tb maps this ball into itself and step 1.1 shows that it is a contraction with constant q<1; [F3] therefore gives exactly one fixed point u(b)∈Bρˉ.

3.2givenstep 2.2F1F4algebra

Taylor remainder: fix b∈I and take h small enough that b+h∈I. Put u′:=u(b+h) and Δ:=u′−u(b), and for k≥0 put zk:=yk+uk(b) and zk′:=yk+uk′, with z−1:=b and z−1′:=b+h. For n≥1, [F1] applied at z=(zn−1∗,zn+1∗) and z′=(zn−1′,zn+1′) gives ∣(Tb+hu′)n−(Tbu)n−∂1MsnΔn−1−∂2MsnΔn+1∣≤K(∣Δn−1∣+∣Δn+1∣)2≤2K(∣Δn−1∣2+∣Δn+1∣2), and multiplying by θ−n bounds this by 2Kθn(θ−2+θ2)∥Δ∥θ2. For n=0 the two input differences are h and Δ1; [F1] gives a remainder bounded by K′(∣h∣+∣Δ1∣)2≤2K′(h2+∣Δ1∣2) with a uniform K′, so altogether ∥u′−(Tbu)−[DuTb(u)]Δ−DbTb(u)h∥θ≤C0(∥Δ∥θ2+h2) with C0<∞.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1F1F3F4algebra

Lipschitz dependence and a priori bound: for u∈Bρˉ and b,b′∈I, (Tb′u)n=(Tbu)n for n≥1, while ∣(Tb′u)0−(Tbu)0∣≤c∣b′−b∣ by [F1]. Applying this with u=u(b′) and using step 1.1 gives ∥u(b′)−u(b)∥θ≤q∥u(b′)−u(b)∥θ+c∣b′−b∣, hence ∥u(b′)−u(b)∥θ≤c∣b′−b∣/(1−q). At b=b∗, u(b∗)=0 because the zero sequence solves the fixed-point equation; taking one parameter to be b∗ gives ∥u(b)∥θ≤c∣b−b∗∣/(1−q).

5.1step 4.1step 2.2step 3.2F1F4algebra

Differentiability: write DuT:=DuTb(u(b)) and DbT:=DbTb(u(b)) for the two partial derivatives of the map (b,u)↦Tbu at (b,u(b)). By step 3.2 applied to the fixed point equations u(b+h)=Tb+hu(b+h) and u(b)=Tbu(b), u(b+h)=u(b)+DuT Δ+DbT h+R1,∥R1∥θ≤C0(∥Δ∥θ2+h2), with Δ=u(b+h)−u(b). By step 2.2, h d(b)=DuT (h d(b))+DbT h; subtracting h d(b) from the displayed equation and putting R:=Δ−h d(b) therefore yields R=DuT R+R1, whence ∥R∥θ≤q∥R∥θ+∥R1∥θ. By step 4.1, ∥Δ∥θ≤c∣h∣/(1−q), so ∥R1∥θ≤C1h2 for ∣h∣ small and hence ∥R∥θ≤C1h2/(1−q): that is, u(b+h)=u(b)+h d(b)+O(h2) in ℓθ∞(N). This proves differentiability with derivative d(b) and identifies it with the solution of clause 3.

5.2step 4.1step 2.2F1F4

Continuity of the derivative: by step 2.2 the difference of the linear operators at b′ and b has coefficients ∂iMsn(zn±1′)−∂iMsn(zn±1), which tend to zero uniformly in n as b′→b by uniform continuity of the ∂iMu on the compact J×J and by the uniform estimate ∣zk′−zk∣≤c∣b′−b∣/(1−q) of step 4.1; the same holds for the forcing. Applying the difference estimate of step 4.1 to the fixed points d(b′),d(b) of the affine maps gives ∥d(b′)−d(b)∥θ→0.

6.1step 2.2step 5.1step 5.2F4F5∎

The curve: the map b↦γ(b)=(b,y0+u0(b)) has components the identity and the affine function of u0, and b↦u0(b) is continuously differentiable by steps 5.1 and 5.2 with derivative d0(b); hence γ is C1 with the displayed derivative ([F5]). The bound ∣d0(b)∣≤∥d(b)∥θ≤c/(1−q) is step 2.2.

Remarks

  • The lemma isolates the exact contractive mechanism used for both the unperturbed square-root recurrence and its perturbations: only the two partial-derivative bounds of the update and the existence of one reference half-orbit are used, not the explicit shape of Mu.

  • The weighted growth ∣un∣≤θn∥u∥θ is what makes the solution track the reference half-orbit exponentially; for the phase curve γ this means that the forward orbits of its points converge to the same limit as the reference orbit, which is the stable-set membership used later.

  • No choice principle is used: completeness of the weighted space comes from the complete space of bounded sequences, and the fixed points are unique.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources