Alphabeta Math
PostulateStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck pass‡ sources checked 2026-11-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Shifted G4 quantization in M theory

Physical scope

Source-reported free-period condition for a smooth, second-countable spin eleven-dimensional spacetime with closed four-form curvature; torsion and differential C-field data are explicitly outside the displayed condition.

Postulate

Let Y be a finite-dimensional, Hausdorff, second-countable oriented smooth eleven-manifold without boundary, equipped with a smooth Lorentzian metric g of signature (−,+,…,+) and a time orientation τ: a continuous choice of one component of the timelike cone {v∈TyY:gy(v,v)<0} at every y∈Y. Supply a spin structure in the convention of the eleven-dimensional spin supplier: a smooth principal Spin+(10,1)-bundle P→Y and an equivariant two-sheeted covering Λ:P→Fg,τ+Y over id⁡Y, where Fg,τ+Y is the bundle of oriented, time-oriented orthonormal frames. Work componentwise, with each connected component path connected and of CW type. Let G4∈Ω4(Y;R) be a smooth closed real four-form in the source's unit-membrane-coupling normalization. This postulate specifies only curvature-level data: the closed form, the integral spin class below, and their de Rham period condition. No global C-field object, descent data, holonomy, or differential-cohomology lift is assumed or constructed; any local three-form potentials are additional data and are not used in the condition. Write H4(Y;Z) for singular cohomology and let ρY:H4(Y;Z)→HdR4(Y;R) be the coefficient-to-period map constructed from the standard cohomology comparisons. Adopt the source-reported spin class λ∈H4(Y;Z) satisfying 2λ=p1(TY) as an additional physical topological input. Then adopt the free-period condition [G42π]dR−12ρY(λ)∈im⁡ ⁣(ρY:H4(Y;Z)→HdR4(Y;R)). Here unit-membrane-coupling normalization means the following local convention in ℏ=c=1 units. Whenever an additional smooth local potential c3∈Ω3(U;R) on an open U⊆Y is supplied with dc3=G4∣U, its electric membrane factor is exp⁡(i∫Σ3X∗c3) for a smooth map X:Σ3→U from a compact oriented smooth three-manifold without boundary. The coefficient in this exponent is +1 and the integral is dimensionless; in length-valued coordinates the components of c3 and G4 have dimensions length−3 and length−4. This specifies a local factor only, not a globally single-valued membrane amplitude independently of the fermion factor.

This is the typed de Rham form of the source's shifted integral-period statement. It is an anomaly/quantization postulate, not a theorem of ordinary cohomology and not a consequence of the local CJS field equations. The CJS carrier instead defines F4=dC3 with dimensionless components of C3; it does not identify F4 with the normalized G4. If an additional constant electric coupling q>0 of dimension length−3 is supplied through a local membrane term +q∫Σ3X∗C3, the corresponding conversion is c3=qC3 and G4∣U=qF4∣U. No value of q, or identification with a membrane tension, follows from the source-free CJS action or is needed for the displayed condition on G4. A globally defined CJS potential yields an exact rescaled curvature and alone cannot represent a nonzero real flux class. The displayed condition forgets torsion and does not specify a global C-field or a differential-cohomology refinement.

Statement References

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The oriented, time-oriented smooth Lorentzian eleven-manifold (Y,g,τ) with its supplied spin lift, a closed curvature form G4, the source-reported integral class λ, and the adopted quantization premise.

[F1]

The R4 CJS carrier defines F4=dC3 in supergravity units, with dimensionless potential components and a globally defined potential in its source-free exact sector (Eleven-Dimensional CJS Supergravity Bosonic Action). The unit-coupled G4 convention is specified separately in the Postulate; conversion requires an additional membrane coupling q, giving c3=qC3 and G4=qF4 on the supplied potential patch. The CJS carrier supplies no such coupling.

[F2]

The eleven-dimensional spin carrier defines Spin+(10,1) and its covering of the oriented, time-orientation-preserving Lorentz group; a spin structure is the supplied equivariant covering Λ:P→Fg,τ+Y over the identity, on the oriented, time-oriented Lorentzian manifold (Y,g,τ) (Eleven-Dimensional Spin Structure and Majorana Bundle). No existence assertion for an arbitrary Lorentzian manifold is used.

[F3]

Pontryagin classes are defined by complexification over a CW-type base under full choice; for a real bundle, p1=(−1)c2(EC) (Pontryagin classes by complexification).

[F4]

A second-countable smooth manifold has CW homotopy type under the stated choice premise (Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type).

[A3]

The characteristic-class definition is applied separately on each path-connected CW-type component of Y.

[F5]

The map ρY is well defined and kills torsion (Integral cohomology classes define real de Rham periods).

[A1]

Full choice is assumed as required by the pinned Pontryagin-class definition (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

The source-reported spin divisibility p1(TY)=2λ and the shifted flux condition are adopted physical premises; the Pontryagin definition does not prove spin divisibility.

Remarks

The condition controls the image in real de Rham cohomology only. Applications with torsion, boundaries, localized sources, or singular spacetime require additional relative or differential-cohomology data.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources