Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integral cohomology classes define real de Rham periods

Statement

Assume countable choice. For every finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold Y without boundary, coefficient inclusion Z↪R and the standard comparisons define a group homomorphism ρY:Hsing4(Y;Z)⟶HdR4(Y;R). Concretely, extend an integral singular cocycle coefficientwise to a real cocycle, pass from continuous to smooth singular cohomology by restriction, and apply the inverse of the de Rham integration isomorphism. This composite is well defined and sends every torsion class to zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and a finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold Y without boundary.

[A1]

Assume countable choice, ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Singular cochains are homomorphisms from the free abelian singular chain group, with coboundary given by precomposition with the singular boundary (Singular cochain complex with coefficients).

[F2]

Singular cohomology is the cocycle group modulo the coboundary group (Singular cohomology with coefficients).

[F3]

Under [A1], restriction induces a natural isomorphism from continuous real singular cohomology to smooth real singular cohomology (Smooth and continuous real singular cohomology agree).

[F4]

Integration induces the well-defined real linear de Rham map from de Rham cohomology to smooth singular cohomology (The de Rham map on cohomology is well defined).

[F5]

Under [A1], this de Rham map is an isomorphism (De Rham theorem for smooth singular cohomology).

[F6]

De Rham cohomology is the quotient of closed forms by exact forms and is a real vector space (De rham cohomology).

Proof

Given: [A1], Y, and the coefficient inclusion j:Z↪R.

1.1givenF1F2algebra

For a singular cochain φ:C4(Y;Z)→Z, define j#φ=j∘φ. Since both coboundaries are precomposition with the same boundary map, δ(j#φ)=j#(δφ). Thus cocycles map to cocycles and coboundaries map to coboundaries; [F2] gives the induced homomorphism rY:Hsing4(Y;Z)→Hsing4(Y;R).

2.1A1F3F4F5step 1.1algebra

Let sY be the restriction isomorphism in [F3], and let IY be the de Rham isomorphism in [F4]–[F5]. Define ρY=IY−1∘sY∘rY. Each factor is a group homomorphism and IY−1 exists by [F5], so this defines a well-defined group homomorphism with the stated domain and codomain.

3.1F6step 2.1algebra∎

If c is torsion, then nc=0 for some integer n>0. By additivity, nρY(c)=ρY(nc)=0. The target is a real vector space by [F6], whose additive group has no nonzero finite-order elements; hence ρY(c)=0.

Remarks

The displayed map records only the real cohomology class of an integral class. In particular, it discards torsion and does not provide differential-cohomology data.

Here H∞4(Y;R) denotes smooth singular cohomology as in [F3]–[F5]. The rows point to the right; the upper arrows are coefficient extension rY and restriction sY, the vertical arrow is ρY, and the lower arrow is de Rham integration IY. The diagram records IY∘ρY=sY∘rY; the proof above establishes this identity from the maps and isomorphism suppliers, rather than relying on the picture.

H4sing(Y;Z)H4sing(Y;R)H41(Y;R)H4dR(Y;R)H41(Y;R)rY½YsYIY

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources