Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact no-boundary normal charge compatibility

Statement

Let Σ be a compact oriented smooth three-manifold without boundary with smooth Riemannian metric h. Let n be a future unit normal, let e be the electric vector determined by the two-form convention of Strict charged barotropic tensor system, and suppose smooth initial data for that system satisfy the sourced electric Gauss constraint

div⁡he=−μ0g(j,n).

Define the SI normal-charge integral

Qn:=−1c∫Σg(j,n) vol⁡h=∫ΣNZ(−g(u,n)) vol⁡h.

Then Qn=0. The result is conditional on the stated Gauss constraint; it does not assert existence of initial data satisfying the remaining Einstein or magnetic constraints.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The compact oriented boundaryless Riemannian three-manifold and smooth charged-fluid initial data of Strict charged barotropic tensor system, with its sourced Gauss constraint.

[F1]

Strict charged barotropic tensor system: ja=cNZua, N>0, and g(u,u)=−1.

[A1]

The specified initial electric Gauss equation is div⁡he=−μ0g(j,n); it is an explicit hypothesis of this proposition.

[F2]

Riemannian divergence: The Riemannian divergence is the scalar determined in each oriented chart by Levol⁡h=(div⁡he)vol⁡h.

[F3]

Coordinate formula for riemannian divergence: If hij is the coordinate metric and e=ei∂i, then div⁡he=(det⁡h)−1/2∂i((det⁡h)1/2ei).

[F4]

Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes: For a compactly supported smooth 2-form η on an oriented boundaryless smooth three-manifold, its finite chart integral satisfies ∫Σdη=0.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F3algebra

On an oriented coordinate chart write vol⁡h=det⁡h dx1∧dx2∧dx3. Direct contraction gives ιevol⁡h=e1det⁡h dx2∧dx3−e2det⁡h dx1∧dx3+e3det⁡h dx1∧dx2. Differentiating and reordering the wedge factors gives d(ιevol⁡h)=∂i(det⁡h ei)dx1∧dx2∧dx3=(div⁡he)vol⁡h by [F3].

2.1step 1.1A1F4algebra

Since Σ is compact, ιevol⁡h is compactly supported. Apply [F4] to step 1.1 to obtain ∫Σdiv⁡he vol⁡h=0. Integrating [A1] therefore gives 0=−μ0∫Σg(j,n)vol⁡h, and μ0>0 implies ∫Σg(j,n)vol⁡h=0.

3.1step 2.1F1algebra∎

By [F1], j=cNZu and hence −c−1g(j,n)=NZ(−g(u,n)) pointwise. The definition of Qn and step 2.1 give Qn=0. No sign assumption on Z is needed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources