Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Accumulated pressure-observation error for the smooth MINI branch

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and a smooth MINI observation interface as specified by the interface definition on this page. In particular, D⊂Rd is bounded, connected, Lipschitz and polygonal or polyhedral with d∈{2,3}; T>0, ν>0, and f∈L2(0,T;L2(D)d); the exact no-slip solution has u∈W1,∞(0,T;H2(D)d∩Vσ) and p∈W1,∞(0,T;H1(D)∩Q); the MINI meshes are shape-regular conforming affine simplices; the initial value is uh0=PZhu(0); and any actual mixed backward Euler MINI solution is used. No mesh/time relation is imposed. Impose the time-step restriction τmax⁡Λ≤12 of the smooth-branch pressure-primitive theorem. Set M=1+∥u∥W1,∞H2+∥p∥W1,∞H1, H=hM+τmax⁡M2, Mu=∥u∥L∞(0,T;V), ME=ν−1/2∥u(0)∥2+CP(D)ν−1∥f∥L2(0,T;L2(D)d), and Λ=1+CDν−3Mu4, where CD depends only on the domain, dimension and trilinear-form constant. Let C∗ be exactly the explicit viscosity-dependent constant in the smooth MINI velocity-error theorem. Let β>0 be the uniform MINI inf-sup lower bound, let Mb=d, let CI be a mean-adjusted continuous P1 pressure interpolation constant satisfying inf⁡qh∈Qh∥q−qh∥2≤CIh∥q∥H1(D) for q∈H1(D)∩Q, and choose Cc such that ∣c(a;b,v)∣≤Cc∥a∥V∥b∥V∥v∥V. Let CP(D) satisfy ∥v∥L2(D)≤CP(D)∥v∥V for v∈V. With K=(1+Mb/β)CIT+β−1(2CP+[2νT+Cc(ME+TMu)]ν−1/2)C∗+β−1(2νT+2CcT). For every ξ∈Q, every η∈Cc∞(0,T), and every node 0≤m≤N, the interface observations satisfy ∣(P(tm)−Phm,ξ)L2∣≤KH∥ξ∥Q.

∣(∫0T(p(t)−pˉh(t))η(t) dt,ξ)L2∣≤(K+1)H∥η′∥L1(0,T)∥ξ∥Q. These are accumulated-pressure and time-tested pressure bounds on the smooth branch. They do not assert an instantaneous pressure-error rate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the smooth MINI interface and all its exact and discrete solution data, the constants and time-step condition in the Statement, ξ∈Q, and η∈Cc∞(0,T).

[A1]

Countable Choice means that every family (Xn)n∈N of nonempty sets has a choice function f with f(n)∈Xn. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

Under the smooth-branch, mesh, initialization, forcing, and time-step hypotheses, the imported integrated-pressure theorem gives max⁡m∥P(tm)−Phm∥Q≤KH. (First-order smooth pressure-primitive error for backward Euler MINI)

[F2]

Under the same hypotheses, the imported theorem gives ∥∫0T(p−pˉh)η dt∥Q≤(K+1)H∥η′∥L1(0,T) for every η∈Cc∞(0,T). (First-order smooth pressure-primitive error for backward Euler MINI)

[F3]

The interface defines P(t)=∫0tp(s) ds, Phm=∑n=1mτnphn, pˉh(t)=phn on (tn−1,tn], and the two scalar pressure observations by pairing with ξ∈Q. (Smooth MINI observation interface)

Proof

1.1givenF3construct

By [F3], the endpoint observation is (P(tm)−Phm,ξ)L2.

1.2A1F2given

By [F2], the time-tested pressure difference has Q norm at most (K+1)H∥η′∥L1(0,T).

2.1A1F1step 1.1algebra

The Hilbert-space Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and [F1] give ∣(P(tm)−Phm,ξ)L2∣≤∥P(tm)−Phm∥Q∥ξ∥Q≤KH∥ξ∥Q.

3.1F3step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

Pairing that Q-valued integral with ξ and applying Cauchy–Schwarz yields ∣(∫0T(p−pˉh)η dt,ξ)L2∣≤(K+1)H∥η′∥L1(0,T)∥ξ∥Q. Together with steps 1.2 and 2.1 this proves both claims.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources