Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Lorentzian spin double cover from Hermitian matrices

Statement

Assume ACω for the cited smooth Lie-group convention. For a complex matrix A, write A†:=A‾T. Let η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) and define SL(2,C)={A∈M2(C):det⁡A=1}. Let σ1=(0110), σ2=(0−ii0), σ3=(100−1) and X(x)=x0I+x1σ1+x2σ2+x3σ3 for x∈R4. The real-linear map x↦X(x) identifies R4 with the Hermitian 2×2 matrices and −det⁡X(x)=−(x0)2+(x1)2+(x2)2+(x3)2. For A∈SL(2,C), let ρ(A) be the real linear transformation defined by

X(ρ(A)x)=AX(x)A†.

Then ρ:SL(2,C)→SO+(1,3) is a smooth surjective Lie-group homomorphism, its kernel is exactly {I,−I}, and its differential at the identity is an isomorphism. In particular, ρ is a two-sheeted covering homomorphism. This is a local group statement; it does not assert that a spacetime admits a global spin lift.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Minkowski quadratic form, the group SL(2,C), and the matrix action specified in the Statement.

[F1]

The Leibniz determinant formula gives det⁡(abcd)=ad−bc and det⁡(A†)=det⁡A‾; determinants of square-matrix products multiply (For n≥1, the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and ∣det⁡A∣ for a real matrix, For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, det⁡(AB)=det⁡(A)det⁡(B)).

[F2]

Path-connectedness of SL(2,C): SL(2,C) is path-connected.

[F3]

Linear and affine Lorentz maps, and the Lorentz group: SO+(1,3) is the subgroup of Lorentz maps preserving orientation and the chosen future cone.

[F4]

Connectedness of the proper orthochronous Lorentz group: with the Euclidean subspace topology inherited from M4(R), SO+(1,3) is path-connected and is the connected component of I4 in O(1,3).

[F5]

Poincare semidirect group, dual pairing and moment components: under ACω, SO+(1,3) has its smooth six-dimensional matrix Lie-group structure.

[F6]

The Lie algebra of eta-antisymmetric endomorphisms, its generators and commutators: the matrices K satisfying KTη+ηK=0 form a six-dimensional real vector space.

[F7]

The Euclidean inverse function theorem: a smooth map between equal-dimensional Euclidean coordinate neighborhoods with invertible derivative at a point is a local diffeomorphism there.

[F8]

Lie group: a finite-dimensional smooth manifold with smooth group multiplication and inversion is a Lie group.

Proof

1.1givenF1F8algebra

Every Hermitian matrix has a unique form X(x), since its two real diagonal entries determine x0,x3 and its complex off-diagonal entry determines x1,x2. Direct evaluation gives X(x)=(x0+x3x1−ix2x1+ix2x0−x3),det⁡X(x)=(x0)2−(x1)2−(x2)2−(x3)2. Near its identity, the set SL(2,C) is a smooth real six-dimensional manifold: where the upper-left entry a is nonzero, writing a matrix as (abcd), the equation ad−bc=1 uniquely gives d=(1+bc)/a, so (a,b,c) are six real local coordinates. Left translates of this chart cover the group and have smooth transitions because left multiplication is a smooth invertible matrix map. The group product and inverse are smooth matrix operations, so [F8] makes SL(2,C) a Lie group.

2.1givenF1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

For A∈SL(2,C), multiplicativity and the conjugate-transpose determinant identity in [F1] give det⁡(AXA†)=det⁡X. Thus the action defines a real linear Lorentz map ρ(A); composition satisfies ρ(AB)=ρ(A)ρ(B), and the coordinate entries are quadratic polynomials in the entries of A, so ρ is smooth. Given any A, choose a path At in SL(2,C) from I to A by [F2]. Then t↦ρ(At) is a path of Lorentz maps from the identity to ρ(A). By [F4], its endpoint is in SO+(1,3).

3.1givenA1F1F3F5F6step 2.1algebra

A tangent matrix at I to SL(2,C) has trace zero: differentiating ad−bc=1 at I gives Z11+Z22=0. Conversely, for any trace-zero Z=(zbc−z), the curve A(t)=(1+tztbtc(1+t2bc)/(1+tz)) has determinant one near 0 and derivative Z at 0. Hence the real tangent space has dimension six. Differentiating the action gives dρI(Z)X=ZX+XZ†. Since [F1] shows that the action preserves −det⁡X, differentiation places dρI(Z) in the tangent space of the Lorentz group. If it vanishes for every Hermitian X, then X=I gives Z†=−Z, and the remaining equations give ZX=XZ for every Hermitian X. Commuting with diag⁡(1,0) makes Z diagonal; commuting with σ1 makes its diagonal entries equal. Its trace is zero, so Z=0. Thus dρI is injective. Every tangent K to SO+(1,3) at I is the derivative of a smooth curve Λ(t) in that group. Differentiating Λ(t)TηΛ(t)=η at t=0 gives KTη+ηK=0, so by [F6] the target tangent lies in the six-dimensional eta-skew space. By [F5] its own dimension is six, hence it equals that space. The injective differential between the six-dimensional source and target tangent spaces is therefore an isomorphism.

4.1F4F7step 2.1step 3.1

Apply [F7] in smooth coordinate charts at the identity, using step 3.1: after shrinking a neighborhood U of I in SL(2,C), ρ maps U diffeomorphically onto a neighborhood V of the identity in SO+(1,3). Since ρ is a homomorphism, its image is a subgroup containing V and hence is open. Every coset of this subgroup is open; its complement is a union of open cosets, so the image is also closed. The target is connected by [F4], and the image is nonempty, so it is all of SO+(1,3).

5.1givenF1step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

If A lies in the kernel, then AXA†=X for every Hermitian X. Setting X=I gives AA†=I, so A is unitary and the same equations imply AX=XA. Commuting with diag⁡(1,0) and σ1 as in step 3.1 forces A=zI; det⁡A=1 gives z2=1. Both I and −I act trivially, hence the kernel is exactly {I,−I}. Shrink U from step 4.1 so that U∩(−U)=∅. If ρ(B)∈V, let C∈U be the unique point with ρ(C)=ρ(B); then BC−1 is in the kernel, so B=C or B=−C. Therefore ρ−1(V)=U⊔(−U) and both pieces map diffeomorphically to V. Translating this neighborhood by any target element gives evenly covered neighborhoods everywhere, proving that ρ is a two-sheeted covering.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources