Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Wilsonian Superpotential Nonrenormalization in a Finite Supersymmetric EFT Basis

Physical scope

Formal perturbative Wilsonian superpotential coefficients in a fixed finite rigid four-dimensional N=1 EFT basis at nonzero cutoff. No arbitrary 1PI, nonperturbative, continuum, empirical, or scale-dependent field-normalization claim is made.

Statement

Let the rigid four-dimensional N=1 Wilsonian effective-action data and finite operator basis be as in the action definition, with formal cutoff 0<λ<Λ0. Let Fλ(Φ,W) denote the derivative-free, holomorphic chiral integrand of the Wilsonian action, and define its superpotential part by Wλ(Φ)=Fλ(Φ,0). Fix a finite ordered basis of retained light-field superpotential operators and a scale-independent linear coordinate projection Phol onto that basis. Use the same unrescaled chiral fields, quotient relations, and operator coordinates at every scale. At constant coefficient backgrounds put c0=FΛ0(0,0) and fix Fλ(0,0)=c0 at every scale. Numerical constants have zero rigid F-action, so this fixes a density representative rather than imposing a Ward-identity consequence. Bare constant FI terms, if present, are kept fixed and are excluded from promotion to unconstrained real coefficient backgrounds. For a gauge sector, select the general F-term theorem's linear Lorenz BRST component graph completion, with its nonminimal doublet, homogeneous gauge/ghost kernels, fixed infrared inverses and zero-mode prescription, and fixed component/source coordinates; in an ungauged model the gauge/ghost sector is absent. Its regulator must satisfy that completion's spurion and Ward compatibility conditions, with the explicitly induced Wess–Zumino component variation, the fixed physical coefficient extraction, and the full gauge-fixed action on the change-of-variables Ward identity's right-hand side; gauge-fixing and ghost variations are retained. Assume the selected formal perturbative cutoff prescription has the local nondynamical-spurion extension and local derivative expansion specified in the action data; its local counterterms obey chirality as an identity in the coefficientwise formal background-jet algebra before constant-background evaluation, with independent first anti-chiral jets of each unconstrained real coefficient spurion; its perturbative vertices are one-particle-irreducible; its rigid supersymmetry and BRST/gauge Ward identities hold coefficientwise for every local insertion and their counterterms; and it has no local gauge anomaly.

Adopt full Axiom of Choice as a sufficient ambient assumption for the selected action data; the regulated equivalence supplier requires no additional full-Choice premise. Then, coefficientwise at every perturbative order,

PholWλ=PholWΛ0.

Thus every retained holomorphic superpotential coefficient in the fixed unrescaled field basis is unchanged by the formal Wilsonian cutoff evolution. The separately displayed holomorphic gauge coupling may receive a one-loop correction but no higher-loop correction. The real D-term function and Kähler data may change. This does not constrain arbitrary one-particle-irreducible vertices, coefficients after a scale-dependent field rescaling, nonperturbative corrections, or a continuum interacting quantum field theory.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; the fixed finite rigid N=1 Wilsonian EFT basis; a nonzero formal cutoff; and the local spurion, derivative-expansion, symmetry-preserving Ward-identity, locality, and anomaly-free hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Supersymmetric Wilsonian EFT action and threshold data: the Wilsonian action has a derivative-free holomorphic chiral integrand Fλ(Φ,W) and a separate real D-term; its finite operator quotient, ordered basis, cutoff, and field coordinates are supplied data.

[F2]

N=1 Wilsonian F-Term Nonrenormalization: under its specified linear Lorenz BRST component graph completion and its stated local spurion, formal background-jet, rigid N=1 and BRST/gauge Ward-identity, derivative-expansion, one-particle-irreducible vertex and anomaly-free hypotheses, collect all matter-independent quadratic gauge terms into Pkin and write Frem for the remaining derivative-free holomorphic integrand. With its ultraviolet numerical-constant representative fixed, Frem,λ=Frem,Λ0 coefficientwise; the collected gauge-kinetic coefficients may receive one-loop but no higher-loop corrections. The real D-term is not protected.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. Full AC is adopted as a sufficient ambient assumption for the selected action data; the regulated equivalence theorem requires no additional full-Choice premise; the restriction to W=0 and fixed-basis coordinate projection below do not use a choice function.

[A2]

The finite relation quotient, ordered basis, coordinate projection, and unrescaled light fields are independent of λ; no scale-dependent change of field coordinates is performed.

[A3]

The selected graph prescription is the supplier's specified component gauge completion when a gauge sector is present, and the regulator and counterterms satisfy all symmetry-preservation, coefficientwise formal background-jet, locality, one-particle-irreducibility, and no-local-gauge-anomaly hypotheses of [F2] at each formal perturbative order. The real coefficient spurions are unconstrained and their first anti-chiral jets are independent before constant-background evaluation. The constant representative is fixed as in the Statement, and any bare constant FI coefficient is held fixed rather than promoted. No FI correction conclusion is used, so the supplier's additional common-kernel hypothesis for that branch is unnecessary here. No positivity, convergence, or real-analytic extension of the formal coupling series is required.

Proof

Given: [F1], [F2] and [A1]–[A3].

1.1givenF1F2A1A3

Full AC is the adopted sufficient ambient assumption [A1]; it is not an extra premise of the regulated equivalence theorem. Apply [F2] using [A3], collecting all matter-independent quadratic gauge terms, including any initially written in Fλ, into Pkin,λ. The numerical constant of the remainder is fixed by [A3], since Pkin(0)=0. Thus every hypothesis needed for the supplier's nonkinetic F-term conclusion holds, and Frem,λ=Frem,Λ0 coefficientwise. Every collected quadratic term vanishes at W=0, so Fλ(Φ,0)=Frem,λ(Φ,0) at each scale. Evaluating the remainder identity at W=0 and restricting to the fixed light-field variables gives Wλ(Φ)=WΛ0(Φ).

2.1F1A2step 1.1algebra

The map Phol is the same linear coordinate projection at both scales by [A2]. Applying it to the equality in step 1.1 gives PholWλ=PholWΛ0. Since the retained operators are a fixed ordered basis, equality of their coordinate vectors gives equality of each retained coefficient.

3.1F1F2A3step 2.1∎

The gauge-coupling correction and the freedom of the real D-term are exactly the exceptions in [F2]. The conclusion concerns the fixed Wilsonian holomorphic coordinates, so it does not imply equality of one-particle-irreducible vertices or of coefficients after a scale-dependent field rescaling; the formal perturbative hypothesis in [A3] also excludes nonperturbative and continuum conclusions.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources