Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relativistic prescribed-field particle action yields the Lorentz force

Physical scope

Conditional statement about one massive charged particle on a future timelike C2 worldline in a prescribed external C2 four-potential: the fixed-endpoint stationarity of the particle functional is equivalent to the covariant four-force equation and to the adopted Lorentz coupling, with the coordinate force and power laws following. Excluded: self-field, radiation reaction, self-force, monopoles, zero or variable mass, coupled particle-field existence, trajectory approximation, and any empirical claim.

Statement

The finite-interval Riemann particle-sector calculation is choice-free: the field-sector Countable Choice convention of Smooth finite-region Maxwell action, compact variations and the fixed-endpoint particle functional is not used here. Let worldlines, four-velocities and proper times be those of Worldlines, four-velocity, chart readings and the frame/observer distinction, let F be the electromagnetic two-form with the component and potential dictionary of The electromagnetic two-form, its observer decomposition and the four-current, and let m>0 and q∈R be the framework's external rest-mass and charge parameters (Charge parameter, frame charge and current densities, volume charge and flux, and the four-current (a)). Let [a,b] be a nondegenerate compact interval, let X:[a,b]→A be a C2 future timelike massive worldline (clause (a) of Worldlines, four-velocity, chart readings and the frame/observer distinction), let Aμ be a C2 covector field - the prescribed external four-potential - on a neighbourhood of the image of X, and let Spt be the particle functional of clause (c) of Smooth finite-region Maxwell action, compact variations and the fixed-endpoint particle functional, i.e. the functional −mc∫ab−η(X˙,X˙) ds+q∫abAμ(X)X˙μ ds of Fixed-endpoint variation of the relativistic particle functional.

Then, under the adopted stationary-action model for the particle sector (Adopt stationary Maxwell action as alternative physical formulation (ii)), for every fixed-endpoint C2 variation h with h(a)=h(b)=0 the curve X+εh is future timelike for all sufficiently small ∣ε∣, and the following are equivalent: (i) X is stationary for Spt under all such variations; (ii) m dUν/dτ=qFνμUμ on [a,b], where F=dA and τ is the proper time of X; (iii) the four-force equation m dU/dτ=q Φ(U) of the framework's adopted covariant coupling The four-force equation reproduces the coordinate Lorentz force and power, where Φ is the raised-index field operator η(Φ(u),w)=F(w,u). In particular the stationary-action formulation of the particle sector is equivalent, for prescribed external potentials, to the adopted Lorentz coupling; the coordinate equations dpdt=q(E+v×B) and d(γmc2)dt=qE⋅v of The four-force equation reproduces the coordinate Lorentz force and power then hold wherever the laboratory reading is C2.

Scope: the potential, hence the field, is prescribed and external to the particle; the particle's own field, radiation reaction and self-force are excluded, as are magnetic monopoles, zero or variable mass, coupled particle-field existence and any approximation of the trajectory over a time interval. The equivalence is conditional on the adopted postulates and makes no empirical claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nondegenerate compact interval [a,b]; a C2 future timelike massive worldline X:[a,b]→A with four-velocity U and proper time τ; a prescribed C2 covector field Aμ on a neighbourhood of the image of X; the rest-mass and charge parameters m>0, q∈R; the electromagnetic two-form and its potential and index dictionary; the particle functional Spt with its fixed-endpoint C2 variations; and the adopted particle-sector stationary-action principle.

[F1]

The particle functional is Spt[X]=−mc∫ab−η(X˙,X˙) ds+q∫abAμ(X)X˙μ ds on the declared class, with admissible variations the fixed-endpoint C2 variations h(a)=h(b)=0 of Fixed-endpoint variation of the relativistic particle functional (Smooth finite-region Maxwell action, compact variations and the fixed-endpoint particle functional (c)).

[F2]

The curve-variation lemma states that for a C2 future timelike curve X:[a,b]→A and a C2 covector field Aμ on a neighbourhood of its image, for every fixed-endpoint C2 variation the curve X+εh remains future timelike for all sufficiently small ∣ε∣, and stationarity of the displayed functional under all such variations is equivalent to mdUνdτ=qFνμUμ, dτds=−η(X˙,X˙)c, F=dA, with the four-velocity U and proper time τ of the observer-decomposition theorem (Fixed-endpoint variation of the relativistic particle functional).

[F3]

A massive worldline is a future timelike worldline of class Ck, k≥1; its four-velocity U and four-acceleration A satisfy η(U,U)=−c2 and η(U,A)=0 by the observer-decomposition theorem (Worldlines, four-velocity, chart readings and the frame/observer distinction (a)-(b)).

[F4]

The observer-decomposition theorem states (clause (a)) that for a C1 future timelike worldline with four-velocity U one has η(U(s),U(s))=−c2 for every s (Norms of four-velocity and four-acceleration, and the observer rest-space decomposition).

[F5]

The antisymmetric-contraction lemma states that for a skew form F on the four-dimensional Minkowski vector space there is exactly one linear Φ with η(Φ(u),w)=F(w,u), and that in the fixed basis Φ(u)μ=∑α,βημαFαβuβ (Antisymmetric contractions vanish and mU′=qΦ(U) preserves η(U,U)).

[F6]

The two-form definition states that the raised-index operator Φ of the antisymmetric-contraction lemma satisfies Φ(u)μ=ημαFαβuβ, and that if a C1 covector field satisfies Fμν=∂μAν−∂νAμ then the recovered fields obey E=−∇φ−∂tA and B=curl⁡A with φ:=−cA0 (The electromagnetic two-form, its observer decomposition and the four-current (c)-(d)).

[F7]

The framework takes a real charge parameter q∈R in coulombs and a rest-mass parameter m carrying the kilogram (Charge parameter, frame charge and current densities, volume charge and flux, and the four-current (a), Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values (c)).

[F8]

The relativistic Lorentz-force theorem states that, for a future timelike C2 massive worldline in a prescribed C1 field generated externally to the particle, the adopted equation of motion mdUdτ=qΦ(U), η(Φ(u),w)=F(w,u) implies, wherever the worldline is C2, the coordinate force and power laws dpdt=q(E+v×B) and d(γmc2)dt=qE⋅v, with p=mγv and U=γ(c,v) (The four-force equation reproduces the coordinate Lorentz force and power).

[F9]

The adopted particle-sector principle states that the motion is dynamically admissible exactly when the worldline is stationary for the particle functional under all fixed-endpoint C2 variations (Adopt stationary Maxwell action as alternative physical formulation (ii)).

Proof

Proof technique: direct; verify the hypotheses of the curve-variation lemma for the framework's data, transport its equivalence to the framework's four-velocity and proper time, and identify the lowered coefficient equation with the adopted raised-index coupling.

1.1givenF1F2F3

The data meet the hypotheses of [F2]: [a,b] is a nondegenerate compact interval, X is a C2 future timelike curve by [F3] and the statement's class, and Aμ is C2 on a neighbourhood of the image of X by assumption; the functional of [F1] is literally the functional of [F2] in the framework's conventions. Hence for every fixed-endpoint C2 variation h the curve X+εh remains future timelike for all sufficiently small ∣ε∣, and stationarity of Spt under all such variations is equivalent to mdUνdτ=qFνμUμ with the four-velocity U and proper time τ supplied by the observer-decomposition theorem; this is a finite-interval Riemann calculation in ZF and consumes no field-sector choice convention.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F3F4

The curve X of step 1.1 is the framework's massive worldline by [F3] and the functional Spt is the framework's particle functional by [F1]; the four-velocity U and proper time τ occurring in the coefficient equation of [F2] are the four-velocity and proper-time parameter of that same curve, the objects to which [F2] refers through the observer-decomposition theorem, and they satisfy the framework's norm η(U,U)=−c2 by [F4]. Hence condition (ii) is stated with the framework's U and τ, and step 1.1 proves (i)⇔(ii).

3.1step 2.1F5F6algebra

Lowering the index in [F5], (Φ(U))ν=ηνμΦ(U)μ=ηνμημαFαβUβ=FνβUβ=FνμUμ, and [F6] identifies this Φ and the potential relation F=dA with the framework's two-form; since u↦η(u,⋅) is injective (the form is nondegenerate), the component equation m dUν/dτ=qFνμUμ holds for every ν if and only if m dU/dτ=q Φ(U) in V. Hence (ii)⇔(iii).

4.1step 3.1F6F8

Under the adopted coupling (iii), [F8] applies with the prescribed external field of [F6] and the C2 worldline of the statement, so the coordinate force and power laws dpdt=q(E+v×B) and d(γmc2)dt=qE⋅v hold wherever the laboratory reading is C2, with p=mγv and U=γ(c,v) as recorded there.

5.1givenstep 4.1F2F7F8F9∎

The equivalence (i)⇔(ii)⇔(iii) was obtained by instantiating the choice-free finite-interval curve lemma [F2], identifying the framework's worldline objects through [F3] and [F4], and lowering the index through [F5] and [F6]; the potential is prescribed and external, the particle's own field, radiation reaction and self-force are excluded, and the whole statement is conditional on the adopted stationary-action principle [F9] of the particle sector and on the adopted coupling [F8], with no empirical claim and no use of the field-sector Countable Choice convention.

Source notes

The prescribed-field particle action and its reduction to the Lorentz force are Tong §5.5.1-§5.5.2 (printed pp. 118-124), Landau–Lifshitz §16 and Binney §3.1, each in its own conventions; the covariant functional, the fixed-endpoint variation class and the resulting equation are restated here in the framework's (−,+,+,+) dictionary, and the exact coefficient implication is supplied by the in-run mathematical curve-variation lemma rather than accepted from the sources' informal boundary-term step.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources