Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Monochromatic vector scattering by a smooth PEC obstacle: phasor Maxwell fields, the PEC trace condition and outgoing-correction uniqueness

Physical scope

Conditional vector scattering of a smooth frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair by a smooth bounded stationary perfect electric conductor with connected exterior: the scattered and total phasor pairs, the associated real fields solving the zero-source smooth vacuum Maxwell equations on the exterior, the ideal PEC boundary condition n×Etot=0, and uniqueness of the outgoing scattered solution with the prescribed tangential trace. Excluded: lossy, impedance, nonsmooth or dispersive obstacles; determination of induced surface charge or current; radiation-zone amplitude asymptotics beyond the outgoing modal class; singular or point sources; finite-energy, coupled self-force and every empirical claim.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as carried by Existence and uniqueness for the exterior vector Helmholtz problem with prescribed tangential trace and outgoing radiation, whose variational, Sobolev-compactness and compact-spectral steps use it; the algebraic computations below use no further choice. Let O⊂R3 be a bounded open set with C∞ boundary, D:=R3∖O‾ connected, k>0, ω:=ck with c the vacuum speed of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, and R>0 with O‾⊂BR(0); let V⊆R3 be open with D‾⊆V, and let (E~inc,B~inc) be a C∞ frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair on V (Frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pairs and their real-field encoding, Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields, The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields, Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values). Plane-wave instances are provided by Dispersion, transversality and the two polarization conditions for plane-wave solutions: if κ⋅e=0, b=κ×e/ω and ∣κ∣=ω/c, then (E~inc,B~inc)(x)=(e eiκ⋅x,b eiκ⋅x) satisfies the four phasor equations on R3 (Real plane-wave fields encoded by complex amplitudes). Adopt the ideal perfectly conducting (PEC) boundary model: the tangential component of the total electric field vanishes on ∂O. This is a declared idealization of the stationary interface conditions of Stationary macroscopic interface jump conditions for D, B, E and H with vanishing fields inside the conductor; it is not one of the finite-conductivity branches of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch, and the induced surface charge and current are neither prescribed nor determined here. Let eT be the tangential projection of −E~inc on ∂O, and let E~scat be the unique C∞ field on D‾ of Existence and uniqueness for the exterior vector Helmholtz problem with prescribed tangential trace and outgoing radiation with (Δ+k2)E~scat=0 and div⁡E~scat=0 on D (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field, Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field), tangential trace eT on ∂O and that lemma's outgoing modal condition on SR. Set B~scat:=(iω)−1curl⁡E~scat and, on D, E~tot:=E~inc+E~scat, B~tot:=B~inc+B~scat. Then: (a) [Phasor Maxwell] (E~scat,B~scat) and (E~tot,B~tot) are C∞ frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pairs on D; and for every C∞ frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair (E~,B~) on an open set O′⊆R3, the associated real fields of Frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pairs and their real-field encoding satisfy on O′×R the smooth-branch vacuum Maxwell equations of The microscopic vacuum Maxwell equations: smooth and weak branches with ρ≡0 and J≡0. Consequently the associated real total fields Etot,Btot satisfy those source-free equations on D×R. (b) [PEC boundary condition] the tangential trace of E~tot on ∂O vanishes; hence for every unit normal field n of ∂O the associated real total electric field Etot(x,t)=Re⁡(E~tot(x)e−iωt) (Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus) satisfies n×Etot=0 on ∂O×R. (c) [Uniqueness] if (E~′,B~′) is a frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair on D whose fields belong to C∞(D‾;C3) that is outgoing on SR in the modal sense of the vector Helmholtz lemma and has tangential trace eT on ∂O, then (E~′,B~′)=(E~scat,B~scat) on D; equivalently (E~tot,B~tot) is the unique total source-free phasor pair in the corresponding C∞ closure class with that prescribed incident phasor, vanishing tangential electric trace, and outgoing scattered correction E~tot−E~inc in the lemma's modal class. The total field itself is not required to be outgoing; an incident plane wave is generally not outgoing. (d) [Scope] one positive frequency ω=ck, one smooth bounded stationary PEC obstacle with connected exterior, and C∞ incident and scattered classes only; no lossy, impedance, nonsmooth or dispersive obstacle, no determination of the induced surface charge or current, no radiation-zone amplitude or far-field asymptotics beyond the lemma's outgoing modal class, no point or singular source, no finite-energy or empirical claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; the bounded C∞ obstacle O with connected exterior D; k>0, ω=ck, R>0 with O‾⊂BR(0); the open V⊇D‾ and the C∞ frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair (E~inc,B~inc) on V; the tangential projection eT of −E~inc on ∂O; the field E~scat and B~scat=(iω)−1curl⁡E~scat of the Statement; the totals E~tot=E~inc+E~scat and B~tot=B~inc+B~scat on D.

[F1]

Exterior vector Helmholtz lemma: for the geometry, k and R above and every smooth C-valued tangential field eT on ∂O, there is exactly one E∈C∞(D‾;C3) with (Δ+k2)E=0 on D, div⁡E=0 on D, tangential trace Etangential=eT on ∂O, and the modal outgoing condition on SR (its trace lies in H1/2(SR;C3) and its normal derivative on SR equals the sphere Dirichlet-to-Neumann image of that trace componentwise in the weak trace sense); its normal boundary values satisfy the closure relation; the lemma assumes the Axiom of Choice (Existence and uniqueness for the exterior vector Helmholtz problem with prescribed tangential trace and outgoing radiation).

[F2]

Phasor conventions: a frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair on an open set is a C∞ pair (E~,B~) satisfying div⁡E~=0, div⁡B~=0, curl⁡E~=iωB~ and curl⁡B~=−iωc−2E~ there, with divergence and curl acting componentwise on the complex fields; the associated real fields are E=Re⁡(E~e−iωt), B=Re⁡(B~e−iωt) (Frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pairs and their real-field encoding, Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus).

[F3]

Phasor calculus and equivalence: for C1 complex fields the displayed partial-derivative and divergence/curl formulas hold; the real-part evaluation is injective; and the phasor system holds on an open set if and only if the associated real fields satisfy div⁡E=0, div⁡B=0, curl⁡E=−∂tB, curl⁡B=c−2∂tE there (Real parts of e−iωt phasors: calculus, injectivity and equivalence with the real Helmholtz-Maxwell system).

[F4]

Smooth vacuum Maxwell branch at zero sources: for jointly C1 fields with the additional derivatives required by each equation existing and continuous and continuous sources, the adopted vacuum Maxwell postulate consists of the four equations div⁡E=ρ/ε0, div⁡B=0, curl⁡E=−∂tB, curl⁡B=μ0J+c−2∂tE; with ρ≡0 and J≡0 this is exactly the source-free system of [F3] (The microscopic vacuum Maxwell equations: smooth and weak branches, Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values).

[F5]

Plane-wave amplitude equations: for k∈R3∖{0}, ω>0 and e,b∈C3, the plane-wave fields satisfy the source-free smooth Maxwell equations if and only if κ⋅e=0, κ⋅b=0, κ×e=ωb and κ×b=−(ω/c2)e; on the dispersion relation ∣κ∣=ω/c the solutions are exactly the pairs with κ⋅e=0 and b=κ×e/ω (Dispersion, transversality and the two polarization conditions for plane-wave solutions, Real plane-wave fields encoded by complex amplitudes).

[F6]

Vector-calculus identities: for a C2 real field on an open subset of R3, curl⁡curl⁡F=∇div⁡F−ΔF and div⁡(curl⁡F)=0; divergence and curl are linear over the reals, and both identities and both operators extend to complex fields by applying them to real and imaginary parts componentwise (The curl of a curl is the gradient of the divergence minus the Laplacian, The divergence of the curl of a C2 field vanishes, Divergence and curl are linear and satisfy the scalar product rules, The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field, Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field).

[F7]

Tangential projection and cross product: for a unit normal field n of ∂O and a field w, the tangential projection is wtang:=w−(w⋅n)n with the Euclidean inner product of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, and n×w=n×wtang because n×n=0; the cross product is bilinear and alternating (The cross product in R3, The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors).

[F8]

Material context: the PEC condition is the declared idealization of the stationary interface conditions of Stationary macroscopic interface jump conditions for D, B, E and H with vanishing fields inside the conductor; the material-closure branches of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch contain no σ→∞ ideal-conductor branch, and the fields of The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields with the units of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values on the laboratory chart of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields are the physical reading adopted by Frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pairs and their real-field encoding.

[F9]

Choice accounting: the Axiom of Choice of the Statement is used exactly through [F1]; all other computations are pointwise algebra and finite sums, and no further selection from infinite families is made (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct; instantiate the exterior vector Helmholtz lemma for the scattered field, verify the four phasor equations algebraically, transfer the real-field Maxwell statement through the phasor equivalence, read the PEC condition off the tangential traces, and reduce uniqueness of any candidate to the lemma's uniqueness clause
1.1givenF1F6F7

[Setting and existence of the scattered field] The hypotheses of [F1] are met by the geometry, k and R, and eT is a smooth C-valued tangential field on ∂O by [F7] applied to the C∞ incident field; hence [F1] supplies a unique E~scat∈C∞(D‾;C3) with (Δ+k2)E~scat=0, div⁡E~scat=0 on D, tangential trace eT on ∂O, and the outgoing modal condition on SR. The field B~scat:=(iω)−1curl⁡E~scat is C∞ on D‾ by [F6] and the smooth closure regularity of E~scat, and the incident pair together with eT and the geometry is the data of the Statement.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F6algebra

[The scattered pair is source-free] On D: div⁡E~scat=0 by step 1.1; curl⁡E~scat=iωB~scat by the definition of B~scat; div⁡B~scat=(iω)−1div⁡(curl⁡E~scat)=0 by [F6]; and curl⁡B~scat=(iω)−1curl⁡curl⁡E~scat=(iω)−1(∇div⁡E~scat−ΔE~scat)=(iω)−1k2E~scat, which equals −iωc−2E~scat because k=ω/c gives k2/(iω)=−ik2/ω=−iωc−2. All four equations of [F2] hold on the open set D for a C∞ pair, so (E~scat,B~scat) is a frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair on D.

2.2step 1.1F1F2F6algebra

[Uniqueness of the outgoing scattered correction] Let (E~′,B~′) be a frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair on D whose fields belong to C∞(D‾;C3), outgoing on SR in the modal sense of [F1], with tangential trace eT on ∂O. From the phasor equations and [F6], curl⁡curl⁡E~′=iωcurl⁡B~′=iω(−iωc−2E~′)=ω2c−2E~′=k2E~′ and div⁡E~′=0, so [F6] gives ∇div⁡E~′−ΔE~′=−ΔE~′=k2E~′, that is (Δ+k2)E~′=0 on D. The field E~′ is C∞ on D‾, has tangential trace eT, divergence zero and the same modal outgoing condition on SR; all hypotheses of the uniqueness clause of [F1] are therefore satisfied, and E~′=E~scat on D. Then B~′=(iω)−1curl⁡E~′=(iω)−1curl⁡E~scat=B~scat on D by the third phasor equation and the definition of B~scat.

3.1step 2.1F2F6algebra

[The total pair is source-free] On D the incident pair satisfies the four equations of [F2] because D⊆V and the pair is source-free on V; the scattered pair satisfies them by step 2.1; the totals E~tot=E~inc+E~scat and B~tot=B~inc+B~scat are C∞ on D as sums, and each of the four equations is linear over the complex scalars by [F6] applied to real and imaginary parts, so they hold for the totals; hence (E~tot,B~tot) is as well a frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair on D.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F3F4

[Real-field Maxwell statement] Let (E~,B~) be any C∞ frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair on an open O′⊆R3. By [F3] its associated real fields satisfy the real system of [F3] on O′×R, and by [F4] that system with zero sources is exactly the smooth branch of the adopted vacuum Maxwell equations at ρ≡0, J≡0; the required regularity is the joint C1 (indeed C∞) calculus supplied by [F3]. Applying this to (E~tot,B~tot) on O′=D, which is admissible by step 3.1, gives the asserted source-free equations for Etot,Btot on D×R. This proves the two statements of (a), the scattered and total clauses following from steps 2.1 and 3.1.

4.2step 3.1F2F7algebra

[PEC boundary condition] On ∂O one has E~tot,tang=E~inc,tang+E~scat,tang=E~inc,tang+eT=0, because the tangential projection is the real-linear map of [F7] and eT is the tangential projection of −E~inc; thus the tangential trace of E~tot vanishes. For the associated real field, the tangential projection of Etot(x,t)=Re⁡(E~tot(x)e−iωt) is Re⁡(E~tot,tang(x)e−iωt)=0 by the real-linearity of the projection [F7] and of Re⁡; hence n×Etot=n×Etot,tang=0 on ∂O×R by [F7]. This is (b).

5.1step 3.1step 4.2step 2.2F6algebra

[Equivalent total formulation] Write a candidate total pair as (E~inc+E~′′,B~inc+B~′′) on D, with both fields smooth up to its boundary, where (E~′′,B~′′) is the scattered correction, required to be a C∞ frequency-ω source-free vacuum phasor pair and outgoing on SR in the modal sense, with the total tangential electric trace vanishing. By linearity [F6] the total tangential trace is E~inc,tang+E~tang′′, so the vanishing of the total trace is equivalent to E~tang′′=eT; by step 2.2 applied to (E~′′,B~′′), the correction equals (E~scat,B~scat) on D, hence the total equals (E~tot,B~tot); conversely the constructed total has these properties by steps 3.1, 4.2 and the outgoing property of E~scat from step 1.1. This is the equivalent formulation of (c).

6.1step 4.2step 2.2step 5.1F5F8F9given∎

[Scope and choice accounting] Clause (d) records the exact hypotheses: one positive frequency, one smooth bounded stationary PEC obstacle with connected exterior, and C∞ incident and scattered classes; no lossy, impedance, nonsmooth or dispersive obstacle, no induced surface charge or current, no radiation-zone asymptotics beyond the modal class, no singular source and no empirical claim enters the argument. The PEC condition is adopted as an idealization by [F8] and is not derived from the material closures; the total field is not asserted to be outgoing, as an incident plane wave generally is not, and the uniqueness statement is exactly about the total-minus-incident correction. The plane-wave instance clause of the Statement is the specialization of the equivalence of [F5] to ∣κ∣=ω/c and b=κ×e/ω, so it introduces no commitment beyond that cited statement. The only choice principle used is the Axiom of Choice assumed in the Statement through [F1], with the accounting of [F9]; all remaining steps are pointwise algebraic identities and finite sums.

Remarks

  • The phrase "outgoing" applies to the scattered correction only. The constructed total field E~tot=E~inc+E~scat is source-free on D but need not be outgoing, and no decay or far-field asymptotic beyond the lemma's modal class is claimed.
  • The ideal PEC condition is a boundary model, not a theorem about any particular conductor; the induced surface charge and current that would accompany it in a microscopic model are neither prescribed nor derived here.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources