Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stationary macroscopic interface jump conditions for D, B, E and H

Physical scope

The stationary-interface jump conditions n.D=sigma_f, n.B=0, n x E=0, n x H=K_f (jumps of the one-sided traces) for macroscopic fields with a common stationary discontinuity and free sheet sources, concluded from the distributional macroscopic equations under the explicit joint one-sided C1 (or stated weak-trace) hypotheses, with AC_omega carried. A conditional field result: no existence, no constitutive law, no moving interface, no magnetic charge, no magnetic sheet and no dipolar sheet layer; no empirical claim.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), the hypothesis under which Distributional divergence and curl across a stationary interface and the surface conventions of Distributional Maxwell equations with point and stationary-sheet sources are stated, and let the laboratory region U≅I×Ω and its units be those of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields and Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values.

Let S⊂Ω be a fixed compact embedded C2 hypersurface with a chosen unit normal n pointing from the side Ω− to the side Ω+ (Surface distributions and interfacial jumps), let σf:S×I→R and Kf:S×I→R3 be continuous with Kf(x,t)⋅n(x)=0 for all (x,t) (a free surface charge density in C m−2 and a tangential free surface current density in A m−1, both stationary in t), and let ρv:(Ω∖S)×I→R and Jv:(Ω∖S)×I→R3 be continuous and locally integrable on Ω×I. Let E,B,D,H:Ω×I→R3 be locally integrable on Ω×I and of class C1 on (Ω∖S)×I, with the joint one-sided C1 extension property: around every (x0,t0)∈S×I, each side of each field is the restriction of a C1 function on an open spacetime neighbourhood of the corresponding closed side of a smaller stationary graph cylinder, so that the fields and their first space and time derivatives extend continuously to that side, locally uniformly on compact cylinders. Write [F]=F+−F− for the jump of the one-sided traces.

[Thin-interface hypothesis] Suppose that E,B,D,H satisfy the four macroscopic equations of The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources in the distributional sense on U with the source pair ρf=ρv+σfδS, Jf=Jv+KfδS, where the stationary-sheet pairings are those of Distributional Maxwell equations with point and stationary-sheet sources(c) and the equations are div⁡D=ρf, div⁡B=0, curl⁡E=−∂tB, curl⁡H=Jf+∂tD as identities in the sense of Distribution, the fields being identified with their regular distributions (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions) and ψ ranging over Cc∞(U) (Test function space d of an open set, Distributional derivative). This thin-interface solution hypothesis is a modelling assumption of the statement: it is the natural weakening of the smooth macroscopic equations to fields with a common stationary discontinuity, and it is not deduced from the smooth-region equations alone.

Then, pointwise on S×I,

n⋅[D]=σf,n⋅[B]=0,n×[E]=0,n×[H]=Kf,

with the Euclidean inner and cross products of the one-sided traces (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, The cross product in R3); equivalently σf=n⋅[D] and Kf=n×[H] recover the free sheet densities from the field jumps.

[Weak-trace branch] If instead of the joint extension hypothesis the fields have the original one-sided spatial C1 extensions at each time and, in addition, the piecewise first spatial and temporal derivatives are in Lloc1(U) and the one-sided field traces are measurable and locally integrable on S×I with respect to dS dt, then the same four identities hold as identities of sheet distributions and for dS dt-almost every (x,t); since the traces are spatially continuous at each fixed time, they hold for every x∈S for almost every t, and at every (x,t) whenever the jump densities are additionally jointly continuous. Merely having one-sided spatial C1 traces separately at every time does not justify the last upgrade.

[Scope] In the joint one-sided spacetime C1 extension branch, stationarity and the joint extensions make ∂tD and ∂tB locally bounded near S and hence locally integrable, contributing no delta terms. In the weak-trace branch the explicitly assumed locally integrable temporal derivatives provide this conclusion instead. No magnetic charge and no magnetic surface current are present in the sources; no dipolar sheet layer (a concentrated dipole distribution in P or M, which would make the fields non-integrable) is included. No existence theorem for fields with singular sources is asserted, no constitutive law is used, and no empirical claim is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses of the Statement, with ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)); the operators and constant conventions of the Statement; and the thin-interface hypothesis [A1]. The fields E,B,D,H are identified with their regular distributions, and the source pair with the stationary-sheet pairings of [A1].

[A1]

The thin-interface hypothesis: the four identities div⁡D=ρv+σfδS, div⁡B=0, curl⁡E=−∂tB, curl⁡H=Jv+KfδS+∂tD hold as distributions on U, with the source pair of the stationary-sheet pairings and the equation forms of The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources. This solution hypothesis is assumed, not deduced.

[L1]

For a two-sided compact embedded C2 interface S with unit normal n from Ω− to Ω+ and a field F that is C1 on Ω−∪Ω+ with one-sided C1 traces, div⁡F={div⁡F}+n⋅[F]δS and curl⁡F={curl⁡F}+n×[F]δS, where {⋅} denotes the piecewise classical field and [F]=F+−F− (Distributional divergence and curl across a stationary interface).

[L2]

The surface convention: δS(ψ)=∫Sψ dS for ψ∈D(Ω), with dS the surface measure of the compact embedded hypersurface; a continuous density a on S defines aδS(ψ)=∫Saψ dS, both functionals of finite order (Surface distributions and interfacial jumps, Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces).

[L3]

The chart integral defines a finite Borel measure on the compact embedded C1 hypersurface, independent of the finite regular charts; every regular chart density JX is continuous and strictly positive (Chart and partition independence of surface measure, Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces).

[L4]

Locally integrable fields embed as regular distributions by uf(ψ)=∫Ufψ, and the embedding is injective modulo almost-everywhere equality under Countable Choice (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions).

[L5]

The image of a C1 map from a lower-dimensional smooth manifold into a higher-dimensional one is a null subset (The image of a lower-dimensional C1 manifold is null), and a countable union of null sets is null (Subsets and countable unions of null subsets of Rm are null).

[L6]

For compact K in an open set there are smooth compactly supported cutoffs equal to one near K (Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization); if fn→f almost everywhere with ∣fn∣≤g for a single integrable g, then ∫fn→∫f (Dominated convergence); the coordinate hyperplane {x3=0} in R4 is Lebesgue-null as the graph of a measurable function (The graph of a measurable function R^n to R is Lebesgue null).

[L7]

If g∈Lloc1(Ω′) on an open Ω′⊆Rn satisfies ∫gφ=0 for every test function φ, then g=0 almost everywhere (The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations); locally a C1 domain boundary is, after a rigid change of coordinates, the graph of a C1 function, with the domain on one side (Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals).

[L8]

For C1 functions on a closed interval, one-dimensional integration by parts holds (If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v); for L1 functions on sigma-finite product spaces the iterated and multiple integrals agree (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

Proof

technique · first test away from the interface to remove the locally integrable volume part, then extract the continuous coefficient with the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations in surface charts
1.1L3L5L8

The surface S is Lebesgue-null in Ω: by [L3] the finitely many regular charts Xj:Vj→S cover S, each image Xj(Vj) is null in R3 by [L5] because Xj is a C1 map from the lower-dimensional open set Vj⊆R2, and a finite union of null sets is null by [L5]. Consequently, for F∈{B,D} the distributional time derivative of the regular distribution of F is the regular distribution of the piecewise classical time derivative: fix a test ψ with support in a compact cylinder Q‾×J⊆U, so that ⟨∂tF,ψ⟩=−∫UF∂tψ; by [L8] applied after Fubini, this iterated integral equals −∫Q∫JF(x,t)∂tψ(x,t) dt dx, and for every x∈Ω∖S the inner integrand is C1 in t with ψ(x,⋅) compactly supported in J, so [L8] gives ∫JF(x,t)∂tψ(x,t) dt=−∫J∂tF(x,t)ψ(x,t) dt; since S is null, replacing the outer integral over Ω∖S by one over Ω changes nothing, so ⟨∂tF,ψ⟩=∫U{∂tF}ψ for every test ψ, where {∂tF} is locally bounded by the joint one-sided C1 extension hypothesis. In the weak-trace branch, the assumed Lloc1 temporal derivatives instead make the same compact-test products integrable, so the identical Fubini and line-integration argument applies.

1.2L1L8

By [L1], applied to D, B, E, H (each is C1 on Ω−∪Ω+ with one-sided C1 traces under the joint extension hypothesis), the four spatial identities div⁡D={div⁡D}+n⋅[D]δS, div⁡B={div⁡B}+n⋅[B]δS, curl⁡E={curl⁡E}+n×[E]δS and curl⁡H={curl⁡H}+n×[H]δS hold as distributions on U under ACω, with the piecewise fields locally bounded near S. More explicitly, apply [L1] at each fixed time to ψ(⋅,t) and integrate its identity in t. Fubini is justified by the compact-test integrability of the fields, their piecewise spatial derivatives and their surface-time traces; in the weak-trace branch these are exactly the additional stated Lloc1 hypotheses, so the same transfer to spacetime distributions applies without a uniform bound.

2.1step 1.1L2L3L6L7L8

[Coefficient extraction] Let g∈Lloc1(U) and let a be measurable and locally integrable on S×I for dS dt, with ug+aδS=0. Every smooth test supported away from S×I has zero sheet pairing; the fundamental lemma [L7] applied on that open complement therefore gives g=0 almost everywhere there. Since S is null by step 1.1, Fubini [L8] makes S×I null locally in spacetime, so g=0 almost everywhere on U. Thus ∫S×Iaψ dS dt=0 for every ambient smooth compact test ψ. In a sufficiently small rigid graph chart write X(y)=(y,h(y)), with a product box V×(z−,z+)×J contained in the ambient chart/time domain. Shrink V and the height interval so the graph over V stays in a closed subinterval inside (z−,z+). For any η∈Cc∞(V×J) choose β∈Cc∞((z−,z+)) equal to 1 on that graph-height interval by [L6], and take the ambient smooth test ψ(y,z,t)=η(y,t)β(z), transported by the rigid motion and extended by zero. This test uses no composition with the merely C2 graph function; its restriction to S is η. The chart formula [L3] gives ∫V×J(a∘X)(y,t)JX(y)η(y,t) dy dt=0. By [L7], (a∘X)JX=0 almost everywhere; positivity and continuity of JX give a=0 surface-time almost everywhere. Such small boxes cover every chart, so the conclusion holds on S×I. In the joint branch a∘X is continuous; if it were nonzero at one point it would stay bounded away from zero on a nonempty parameter-time box of positive Lebesgue measure, contradicting the almost-everywhere conclusion. Thus a=0 pointwise in that branch.

2.2A1step 1.1step 1.2L2L4

Substituting the spatial identities of step 1.2 and the temporal identity of step 1.1 into the assumed identities [A1] gives four distributional identities of the form ug+aδS=0 with locally integrable volume parts: u{div⁡D}−ρv+(n⋅[D]−σf)δS=0, u{div⁡B}+n⋅[B]δS=0, u{curl⁡E}+{∂tB}+n×[E]δS=0 and u{curl⁡H}−Jv−{∂tD}+(n×[H]−Kf)δS=0; the sums are locally integrable because the piecewise fields and Jv,ρv are locally integrable and the piecewise derivatives are locally bounded near S (joint branch) or assumed locally integrable (weak-trace branch), and the sheet coefficients are the stated one-sided jump densities, continuous in the joint branch.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2A1L1L2L5∎

Apply step 2.1 to each of the four identities of step 2.2: the four coefficients n⋅[D]−σf, n⋅[B], n×[E] and n×[H]−Kf vanish dS dt-almost everywhere, and in the joint branch they are continuous on S×I (one-sided traces of locally uniformly continuous extensions), hence vanish pointwise on S×I; this proves n⋅[D]=σf, n⋅[B]=0, n×[E]=0 and n×[H]=Kf pointwise, equivalently σf=n⋅[D] and Kf=n×[H], and the inner and cross products are those of the one-sided traces written in the frame basis of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields. In the weak-trace branch the four coefficients vanish dS dt-almost everywhere; since the traces are spatially continuous at each fixed time, vanishing on a set of full dS-measure for almost every t upgrades to every x∈S for almost every t, and if the jump densities are additionally jointly continuous, to every (x,t)∈S×I; the four identities hold as identities of sheet distributions in both branches, and all statements are conditional on the assumed distributional equations [A1] with ACω carried from step 1.2.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources