Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Verified rotating electric KN physical model

Physical scope

Conditional solution of the smooth equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model with zero cosmological constant, no material stress or current, and a purely electric KN parameter on the stated pole-free Boyer–Lindquist domains and full-sphere exterior. It makes no horizon-extension, maximality, uniqueness, formation, observational, or empirical-validity claim.

Statement

Let m∗>0 be an SI mass parameter, J∈R an SI angular-momentum parameter, and Qe∈R an SI electric-charge parameter. Use SI and geometric solution parameter identifications to set

M=GNm∗c2,a=Jm∗c,q=GN4πε0c4 Qe,α=4πGNμ0c4.

Set the magnetic flux parameter to zero. Let Σ=r2+a2cos⁡2θ and Δ=r2−2Mr+a2+q2. Use the exact metric and potential of Kerr-Newman metric and potential on the exact Boyer-Lindquist domain on any open pole-free Boyer–Lindquist domain with Σ>0, Δ≠0, and 0<θ<π. Also use its smooth full-sphere exterior extension of Full-sphere exterior extension of the Kerr-Newman datum on X=Rx0×(R0,∞)×S2 for any R0>4∣M∣, with geometric field F=dA and F=F/α. Define

TabEM:=1μ0(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd),κE:=8πGNc4.

In the equation-based physical model of Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model, specialize to Λ=0, j=0, and Tm=0. Conditional on the exact current draft statements and hypotheses of Fully verified electric Kerr-Newman electrovacuum and Sourced Maxwell sign and current conservation, these data satisfy

dF=0,∇agFab=0,Gab=κETabEM.

The claim is a conditional solution on the stated domains. It does not extend the field equations across Δ=0 or assert that the selected model describes any observed object.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: GN,c,μ0>0, m∗>0, SI parameters J,Qe, zero magnetic flux, the stated coordinate domains, and the zero-source equation-based specialization.

[F1]

SI and geometric solution parameter identifications: M=GNm∗/c2, a=J/(m∗c), qe=GN/(4πε0c4) Qe, F=αF, and α=4πGN/(μ0c4)>0.

[F2]

Kerr-Newman metric and potential on the exact Boyer-Lindquist domain: on a pole-free chart, Σ=r2+a2cos⁡2θ, Δ=r2−2Mr+a2+q2, g=−ΔΣ(dx0−asin⁡2θ dϕ)2+ΣΔdr2+Σdθ2+sin⁡2θΣ((r2+a2)dϕ−a dx0)2, and A=−qrΣ−1(dx0−asin⁡2θ dϕ) with F=dA.

[F3]

Full-sphere exterior extension of the Kerr-Newman datum: for R0>4∣M∣, the full-sphere exterior has a smooth global metric and potential agreeing with [F2] away from the axes, with r>R0, Σ>0, and Δ>0.

[A1]

Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model: select its zero-matter instance M0, with configuration set C0[g,F]={∗}, no matter-field variables, equations or additional constraints, and maps J0[g,F;∗]=0 and T0[g,F;∗]=0 to the smooth zero vector field and smooth zero symmetric covariant two-tensor on each stated domain. Thus Ψ=∗ is admissible and j=0, Tm=0. With Λ=0, the adopted equations are dF=0, ∇agFab=−μ0jb, and Gab+Λgab=κE(TabEM+Tabm).

[L1]

Fully verified electric Kerr-Newman electrovacuum: for the exact pole-free KN datum and its stated full-sphere exterior, the current mathematical Statement gives dF=d(⋆gF)=0, Ric⁡=2Qg(F), and, for F=F/α, Gab=κETabEM. Its current proof derives the Hodge-divergence identity locally and uses the exact present observer-stress interface; its Step-1 record is authoring-ready, but the mathematical theorem remains draft and has no independent proof acceptance, so the conclusion is used only conditionally.

[L2]

Sourced Maxwell sign and current conservation: its current Statement assumes the sourced divergence equation before stating the form-equation equivalence. Its Facts [F1]–[F3] specify the smooth oriented Lorentzian geometry, torsion-free metric connection and Hodge conventions. Its Proof 2.1 derives the pointwise identity d(⋆gF)=−ιvvolg, vb=∇agFab, using only smoothness and those geometric conventions; the equivalence clause is not used as a black-box implication here. The supplier is a draft proof without independent acceptance.

[L3]

Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star: in signature (−,+,+,+) and the stated orientation, (⋆gF)ab=12(volg)abcdFcd for smooth two-forms. The metric-selected connection is torsion-free and metric-compatible under the geometric conventions of [L2]. The identity ∇volg=0 used below is derived locally in step 3.1.

[A2]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the geometric flux convention inherited through [F1] uses only ACω, meaning each specified countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. The finite field-equation and tensor-rescaling argument below uses no further choice and does not use full AC.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3A2algebra

By [F1], M,a,q,α are the exact derived length and field-normalization parameters for these SI inputs. With zero magnetic flux, qm=0, so the electric KN parameter in [F2] is precisely q=qe. The open-domain restrictions in the Statement are the nonsingular chart hypotheses of [F2], and R0>4∣M∣ gives the smooth exterior domain [F3]. The inherited flux convention assumes only [A2].

2.1F2F3L1step 1.1

Apply [L1] to the fields in [F2] and [F3]. It gives the source-free geometric equations and the normalized tensor equation Gab=κETabEM on each stated domain, with the full-sphere equations obtained by continuity from the pole-free chart.

3.1L2L3step 2.1algebra

Put Vb:=∇agFab. In an oriented coordinate chart write volg=w dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3 with w=∣det⁡(gab)∣; this coefficient follows from the defining value of the metric volume form on a positively oriented orthonormal basis and the determinant change-of-basis formula. Differentiating the determinant expansion gives ∂cw=12wgab∂cgab, while the Christoffel formula gives Γaca=12gab∂cgab because the other two terms cancel after interchanging their dummy indices. Hence (∇cvolg)0123=∂cw−Γacaw=0, so ∇volg=0. At any point p of a stated domain, choose a positively oriented orthonormal frame with metric matrix η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1). Torsion-freeness gives (d⋆gF)abc=3∇[a(⋆gF)bc]. The component formula in [L3] has (⋆gF)ij=−ϵijkF0k and (⋆gF)0i=12ϵijkFjk, where ϵijk is alternating and ϵ123=+1. In this frame V0=∑i∇iF0i and Vk=−∇0F0k+∑i∇iFik. Substituting the displayed Hodge components into 3∇[a(⋆gF)bc] gives (d⋆gF)123=−V0,(d⋆gF)0ij=ϵijkVk. In the same oriented frame, (ιVvolg)123=V0 and (ιVvolg)0ij=−ϵijkVk, so these components establish d(⋆gF)∣p=−ιV(p)volg∣p. Step 2.1 gives d(⋆gF)=0. Since volg∣p is a nonzero four-form, V(p)↦ιV(p)volg∣p is an isomorphism TpM→Λ3Tp∗M, so V(p)=0. As p was arbitrary, ∇agFab=0 throughout each stated domain.

4.1A1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Under the zero-source specialization of [A1], the equations established in steps 2.1 and 3.1 are exactly the adopted equation-based Einstein–Maxwell system. Therefore the stated KN normalization is a conditional solution of that physical model on the stated domains. The proof makes no horizon-crossing or empirical claim.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources