How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Diagonalisation of the non-interacting finite-mode sector: occupation eigenvalues, partition sum and ground energy
The conditional diagonalisation of the non-interacting finite-mode many-body model: the labelled energy sum is diagonal on the product basis of one-particle eigenmodes, the sector energy operator has the occupation-number eigenvalues on the Slater and symmetric sector bases, the finite partition sum and the ground-state occupation energies are computed, and the sector basis vectors are stationary states of the model evolution. The theorem is conditional on P1, P2, P4 and P6, on the adopted finite-mode idealization and on the declared one-particle Hamiltonian; it asserts no interaction, no spatial or infinite-mode result, no thermal state, no thermodynamic limit and no laboratory identification.
Statement
Adopt the state and composition postulate P1 (State and composition postulate P1: Hilbert spaces, preparations and composite systems), the observable and probability postulate P2 (Observable and probability postulate P2: self-adjoint observables, spectral probability and finite unsharp outcomes), the autonomous-dynamics postulate P4 (Autonomous dynamics postulate P4: self-adjoint generators and unitary evolution) and the identical-particle and spin postulate P6 (Identical-particle and spin assignments P6: permutation sectors and finite-spin representations) in the readings of Declared species sectors and their preparations: the framework's reading of P6 and Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework, and assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Work in the finite-mode realization of the declared fixed- model of The declared fixed-N many-body model: species sector, one-particle data, interaction and the sector energy observable: one-particle space of finite dimension with declared modes , particle number , sector space , one-particle self-adjoint operator , and non-interacting interaction , so that and in the notation of that definition. Let be an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of with real eigenvalues and let be the nondecreasing rearrangement of the list. Then:
(a) the labelled operator is diagonal: is bounded and self-adjoint with , it commutes with every permutation unitary , and for every multi-index ,
(b) occupation eigenvalues and spectrum: for every -element subset the Slater vector of Slater and symmetric occupation-number bases of the finite-dimensional permutation sectors clause (b) is an eigenvector of with eigenvalue , and for every occupation vector the symmetric vector of clause (c) is an eigenvector of with eigenvalue ; the families and are orthogonal bases of and respectively, so the spectrum of is the finite set of these eigenvalues (with multiplicities given by the number of configurations producing them); for and the sector space is and the model has no sector states;
(c) partition sum and ground energy: write The configuration counts are and . For every inverse-energy parameter in (all and configuration energies are read in joules, so each Boltzmann exponent is dimensionless), is finite. If and , then , , and there is no ground eigenvalue or trace-one density operator on the zero sector; in particular no normalized Gibbs density can be formed there. Otherwise and . In this nonzero-sector case, let Then the actual Boltzmann bounds are No nonnegativity hypothesis on the is imposed. For and , and for , For every unit vector in either nonzero sector, , with equality exactly on the eigenspace of ;
(d) reading and stationarity: on a nonzero sector the pair is the model's assigned energy observable; in a declared sector preparation its outcome law is , and in the pure preparation of each sector basis vector of clause (b) this law is the point mass at the displayed eigenvalue; each such vector is a stationary state of the model evolution , and the energy law of every declared sector preparation is the law of the finite spectral sum in the sector basis;
(e) scope: the theorem is conditional on the finite-mode idealization, on the declared and on ; it asserts nothing for interacting models, for spatial realizations, for infinite mode families, about thermal states or equilibration, and about any laboratory system.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the finite-mode non-interacting model data of the statement with its eigenbasis , eigenvalues , sector projections and sector space .
Finite spectral theorem. A self-adjoint endomorphism of the finite-dimensional complex inner product space is normal, so has an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of with real eigenvalues (Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely, Hilbert space).
Slot operators. For the slot operator acts on elementary tensors by , is bounded with , and (Bounded tensor maps: extension, norm estimate, adjoint and commutation, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).
Product basis and occupation bases. The elementary tensors over all multi-indices form an orthonormal basis of ; the Slater vectors over -element subsets form an orthonormal basis of with zero-free for distinct indices and vanishing on repeated indices; the vectors over form an orthogonal basis of , and , (Slater and symmetric occupation-number bases of the finite-dimensional permutation sectors clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power, Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases).
Configuration counts. The map is a bijection from -element subsets onto , the sector dimensions are and , and for the antisymmetric sector is (Finite-mode occupation configurations: fermionic exclusion counts, bosonic counts and truncated dimensions clauses (a), (b), (c), Slater and symmetric occupation-number bases of the finite-dimensional permutation sectors clause (b)).
Stationary states. For the assigned energy observable with flow , a nonzero is an eigenvector of if and only if its pure preparation is stationary, and then (Energy conservation, conserved sharp observables and the stationary eigenrays clause (c)); the outcome law of an assigned observable in a preparation is the trace law of Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework clause (b), and the trace is basis independent (Trace is absolutely convergent and basis independent).
Proof
Given: the data of the statement and [F1]-[F5].
[The labelled operator on the product basis] By [F2] each is bounded and self-adjoint, so is bounded and self-adjoint with . On the product basis vector the -th slot operator acts as on the factor , giving ; hence . Since every permutes the slots and is the sum over all slots, . This proves (a).
[Sector eigenvectors] Let and . By [F3], ; since commutes with by step 1.1 and [F3], . Likewise, for and any multi-index with one has with by [F3], so ; because the and the are orthogonal bases of the respective sectors by [F3], [F4], the spectrum of is the finite set of the displayed eigenvalues with the configurations as multiplicities, and for , the sector is . This proves (b).
[Partition sum and the zero sector] Normalize the symmetric vectors to ; by [F3] these form an orthonormal eigenbasis, as do the Slater vectors in the fermionic sector. The trace is therefore , with the configuration counts and from [F4]. For , , the index set is empty and the trace is the empty sum . There is no eigenvector on and hence no ground eigenvalue, and its only operator has trace , so no trace-one density or normalized Gibbs density exists there. In every other case [F4] gives a finite nonempty index set, so its finite sum of positive Boltzmann weights has . For that case finite minima and maxima exist, and for each configuration , because ; summing the inequalities proves the two bounds. This argument allows negative configuration energies.
[Reading and stationarity] The pair is the model's assigned energy observable of clause (e) of the declared-model definition, so by [F5] its outcome law in a declared sector preparation is ; for the pure preparation of a sector basis vector of step 2.1, and hence is the point mass at . By [F5] and step 2.1 each such is an eigenvector of the generator, so its pure preparation is stationary under the flow with , and the energy law of any preparation is the finite spectral law in the sector basis. This proves (d).
[Extreme energies and ground eigenspace] Work on a nonzero sector. For , each configuration selects distinct eigenvalues, so its energy is at least the sum of the smallest and at most the sum of the largest; these bounds are attained by the corresponding subsets. Thus and . A minimizing subset contains every mode with energy strictly below , contains no mode with energy strictly above , and fills its remaining places with modes at that boundary energy; this includes all choices allowed by degeneracy. For , the identity gives ; the two bounds are attained by putting all particles in a minimum-energy or maximum-energy mode respectively. Equality at the lower bound holds exactly when every occupied mode has energy . Finally expand a unit vector in the orthonormal sector basis of step 3.1: , . Then , with equality exactly when all coefficients at energies greater than vanish, that is, exactly on the ground eigenspace. Together with step 3.1 this proves (c).
[Conclusion and scope] Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove (a) and (b), steps 3.1 and 4.1 prove (c) and step 3.2 proves (d). The argument used the finite-mode idealization, the declared non-interacting and the finite-dimensional spectral and tensor calculus; no interaction, spatial realization, infinite mode family, thermal state, equilibration or laboratory identification entered, which is (e).
Remarks
- Basis independence. The eigenvalues and depend on the eigenvalue list of , not on the choice of eigenbasis; a degenerate one-particle eigenvalue contributes with its multiplicity through the distinct configurations.
- Fermionic emptiness. For and the antisymmetric sector is zero: the algebraic partition trace is , while there are no sector states, no ground eigenvalue and no normalized density. The observable and stationarity readings of clause (d) apply only to nonzero sectors.
- Energy reference. The bounds in (c) permit arbitrary real one-particle energies. If all configuration energies are nonnegative, then ; this count-only upper bound is not valid for unrestricted negative energies. Shifting every one-particle energy by multiplies by and shifts both extreme energies by .
Depends on
The declared fixed-N many-body model: species sector, one-particle data, interaction and the sector energy observable
Declared species sectors and their preparations: the framework's reading of P6
The declared finite-mode model and its occupation readouts
Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework
Assigned energy observable, unitary flow and the two pictures of autonomous evolution
Dimensions, SI unit conventions and quantity types of the framework
State and composition postulate P1: Hilbert spaces, preparations and composite systems
Observable and probability postulate P2: self-adjoint observables, spectral probability and finite unsharp outcomes
Autonomous dynamics postulate P4: self-adjoint generators and unitary evolution
Identical-particle and spin assignments P6: permutation sectors and finite-spin representations
Energy conservation, conserved sharp observables and the stationary eigenrays
Slater and symmetric occupation-number bases of the finite-dimensional permutation sectors
Finite-mode occupation configurations: fermionic exclusion counts, bosonic counts and truncated dimensions
Slater direct and exchange calculation
Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power
Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases
Bounded tensor maps: extension, norm estimate, adjoint and commutation
Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely
Trace is absolutely convergent and basis independent
Hilbert space
A bounded linear operator between normed spaces
The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- J. Binney and D. Skinner, The Physics of Quantum Mechanics, Sections 6.1 and 10.1 printed pages 104-111 and 226-230 (PDF pages 112-119 and 234-238): non-interacting composite Hamiltonians, antisymmetric two-fermion states and Pauli exclusion
- F. H. L. Essler, Advanced Quantum Theory (Oxford lecture notes, 2017/18), Sections 1.2-1.3 pp. 5-9: the occupation-number basis and the diagonal form of a non-interacting many-body Hamiltonian in second quantisation