Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Diagonalisation of the non-interacting finite-mode sector: occupation eigenvalues, partition sum and ground energy

Physical scope

The conditional diagonalisation of the non-interacting finite-mode many-body model: the labelled energy sum is diagonal on the product basis of one-particle eigenmodes, the sector energy operator has the occupation-number eigenvalues on the Slater and symmetric sector bases, the finite partition sum and the ground-state occupation energies are computed, and the sector basis vectors are stationary states of the model evolution. The theorem is conditional on P1, P2, P4 and P6, on the adopted finite-mode idealization and on the declared one-particle Hamiltonian; it asserts no interaction, no spatial or infinite-mode result, no thermal state, no thermodynamic limit and no laboratory identification.

Statement

Adopt the state and composition postulate P1 (State and composition postulate P1: Hilbert spaces, preparations and composite systems), the observable and probability postulate P2 (Observable and probability postulate P2: self-adjoint observables, spectral probability and finite unsharp outcomes), the autonomous-dynamics postulate P4 (Autonomous dynamics postulate P4: self-adjoint generators and unitary evolution) and the identical-particle and spin postulate P6 (Identical-particle and spin assignments P6: permutation sectors and finite-spin representations) in the readings of Declared species sectors and their preparations: the framework's reading of P6 and Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework, and assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Work in the finite-mode realization of the declared fixed-N model of The declared fixed-N many-body model: species sector, one-particle data, interaction and the sector energy observable: one-particle space K of finite dimension d≥1 with declared modes (f1,…,fd), particle number N≥1, sector space HNσ=ran⁡Pσ(N), one-particle self-adjoint operator h∈B(K), and non-interacting interaction W=0, so that Hlab=∑i=1Nh(i) and HNσ=Hlab∣HNσ in the notation of that definition. Let e1,…,ed be an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of h with real eigenvalues ε1,…,εd and let ε(1)≤⋯≤ε(d) be the nondecreasing rearrangement of the list. Then:

(a) the labelled operator is diagonal: Hlab is bounded and self-adjoint with ∥Hlab∥≤N∥h∥, it commutes with every permutation unitary Uπ, and for every multi-index i=(i1,…,iN)∈{1,…,d}N, Hlab (ei1⊗⋯⊗eiN)=(∑k=1Nεik)ei1⊗⋯⊗eiN;

(b) occupation eigenvalues and spectrum: for every N-element subset J⊆{1,…,d} the Slater vector eJ∧ of Slater and symmetric occupation-number bases of the finite-dimensional permutation sectors clause (b) is an eigenvector of HN− with eigenvalue λJ:=∑j∈Jεj, and for every occupation vector λ∈W(N,d)={λ∈Nd:∑jλj=N} the symmetric vector mλ of clause (c) is an eigenvector of HN+ with eigenvalue λλ:=∑j=1dλjεj; the families (eJ∧) and (mλ) are orthogonal bases of HN− and HN+ respectively, so the spectrum of HNσ is the finite set of these eigenvalues (with multiplicities given by the number of configurations producing them); for σ=− and N>d the sector space is {0} and the model has no sector states;

(c) partition sum and ground energy: write CNσ:={λ∈W(N,d):λj≤1 for every j if σ=−},MNσ:=∣CNσ∣=dim⁡HNσ. The configuration counts are MN−=(dN) and MN+=(N+d−1N). For every inverse-energy parameter β>0 in J−1 (all εj and configuration energies are read in joules, so each Boltzmann exponent is dimensionless), ZN(β):=tr⁡e−βHNσ=∑λ∈CNσe−βλλ is finite. If σ=− and N>d, then CN−=∅, ZN(β)=0, and there is no ground eigenvalue or trace-one density operator on the zero sector; in particular no normalized Gibbs density can be formed there. Otherwise MNσ>0 and 0<ZN(β)<∞. In this nonzero-sector case, let E0:=min⁡λ∈CNσλλ,Emax⁡:=max⁡λ∈CNσλλ. Then the actual Boltzmann bounds are MNσe−βEmax⁡≤ZN(β)≤MNσe−βE0. No nonnegativity hypothesis on the εj is imposed. For σ=− and N≤d, E0=∑k=1Nε(k),Emax⁡=∑k=d−N+1dε(k), and for σ=+, E0=Nε(1),Emax⁡=Nε(d). For every unit vector ψ∈HNσ in either nonzero sector, ⟨HNσψ,ψ⟩≥E0, with equality exactly on the eigenspace of E0;

(d) reading and stationarity: on a nonzero sector the pair (HNσ,J) is the model's assigned energy observable; in a declared sector preparation ρ its outcome law is μρ(B)=tr⁡(ρEHNσ(B)), and in the pure preparation of each sector basis vector of clause (b) this law is the point mass at the displayed eigenvalue; each such vector is a stationary state of the model evolution U(t)=exp⁡(−itHNσ/ℏ), and the energy law of every declared sector preparation is the law of the finite spectral sum in the sector basis;

(e) scope: the theorem is conditional on the finite-mode idealization, on the declared h and on W=0; it asserts nothing for interacting models, for spatial realizations, for infinite mode families, about thermal states or equilibration, and about any laboratory system.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the finite-mode non-interacting model data of the statement with its eigenbasis (e1,…,ed), eigenvalues εj, sector projections Pσ(N) and sector space HNσ.

[F1]

Finite spectral theorem. A self-adjoint endomorphism h of the finite-dimensional complex inner product space K is normal, so K has an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of h with real eigenvalues (Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely, Hilbert space).

[F2]

Slot operators. For h∈B(K) the slot operator h(i) acts on elementary tensors by h(i)(v1⊗⋯⊗vN)=v1⊗⋯⊗hvi⊗⋯⊗vN, is bounded with ∥h(i)∥≤∥h∥, and (h(i))∗=(h∗)(i) (Bounded tensor maps: extension, norm estimate, adjoint and commutation, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).

[F3]

Product basis and occupation bases. The elementary tensors ei=ei1⊗⋯⊗eiN over all multi-indices form an orthonormal basis of K⊗N; the Slater vectors eJ∧=N!P−(N)(ej1⊗⋯⊗ejN) over N-element subsets J={j1<⋯<jN} form an orthonormal basis of ran⁡P−(N) with eJ∧ zero-free for distinct indices and vanishing on repeated indices; the vectors mλ=∑c∈orb⁡(λ)ec over λ∈W(N,d) form an orthogonal basis of ran⁡P+(N), and NjeJ∧=1J(j)eJ∧, Njmλ=λjmλ (Slater and symmetric occupation-number bases of the finite-dimensional permutation sectors clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power, Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases).

[F4]

Configuration counts. The map J↦1J is a bijection from N-element subsets onto {λ∈{0,1}d:∑jλj=N}, the sector dimensions are (dN) and (N+d−1N), and for N>d the antisymmetric sector is {0} (Finite-mode occupation configurations: fermionic exclusion counts, bosonic counts and truncated dimensions clauses (a), (b), (c), Slater and symmetric occupation-number bases of the finite-dimensional permutation sectors clause (b)).

[F5]

Stationary states. For the assigned energy observable (Hop,uH) with flow U(t)=exp⁡(−itHop/ℏ), a nonzero ψ is an eigenvector of Hop if and only if its pure preparation is stationary, and then ψ(t)=e−itλ/ℏψ (Energy conservation, conserved sharp observables and the stationary eigenrays clause (c)); the outcome law of an assigned observable in a preparation is the trace law of Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework clause (b), and the trace is basis independent (Trace is absolutely convergent and basis independent).

Proof

technique · direct; expand in the product basis of one-particle eigenmodes, transport the diagonal action to the two sector bases, and read the finite spectrum and trace

Given: the data of the statement and [F1]-[F5].

1.1F1F2F3algebra

[The labelled operator on the product basis] By [F2] each h(i) is bounded and self-adjoint, so Hlab=∑ih(i) is bounded and self-adjoint with ∥Hlab∥≤N∥h∥. On the product basis vector ei=ei1⊗⋯⊗eiN the i-th slot operator acts as h on the factor eik, giving h(k)ei=εikei; hence Hlabei=(∑kεik)ei. Since every Uπ permutes the slots and Hlab is the sum over all slots, UπHlabUπ∗=Hlab. This proves (a).

2.1F3F4step 1.1algebra

[Sector eigenvectors] Let J={j1<⋯<jN} and i=(j1,…,jN). By [F3], eJ∧=N!P−(N)ei; since Hlab commutes with P−(N) by step 1.1 and [F3], HlabeJ∧=N!P−(N)Hlabei=(∑j∈Jεj)N!P−(N)ei=λJeJ∧. Likewise, for λ∈W(N,d) and any multi-index c with ∣c∣=λ one has P+(N)ec=γcmλ with γc>0 by [F3], so Hlabmλ=(∑jλjεj)mλ; because the eJ∧ and the mλ are orthogonal bases of the respective sectors by [F3], [F4], the spectrum of HNσ is the finite set of the displayed eigenvalues with the configurations as multiplicities, and for σ=−, N>d the sector is {0}. This proves (b).

3.1F3F4F5step 2.1algebra

[Partition sum and the zero sector] Normalize the symmetric vectors to m~λ:=mλ/∥mλ∥; by [F3] these form an orthonormal eigenbasis, as do the Slater vectors in the fermionic sector. The trace is therefore ZN(β)=∑λ∈CNσe−βλλ, with the configuration counts MN−=(dN) and MN+=(N+d−1N) from [F4]. For σ=−, N>d, the index set is empty and the trace is the empty sum 0. There is no eigenvector on {0} and hence no ground eigenvalue, and its only operator has trace 0, so no trace-one density or normalized Gibbs density exists there. In every other case [F4] gives a finite nonempty index set, so its finite sum of positive Boltzmann weights has 0<ZN(β)<∞. For that case finite minima and maxima E0,Emax⁡ exist, and for each configuration e−βEmax⁡≤e−βλλ≤e−βE0, because β>0; summing the MNσ inequalities proves the two bounds. This argument allows negative configuration energies.

3.2F5step 2.1algebra

[Reading and stationarity] The pair (HNσ,J) is the model's assigned energy observable of clause (e) of the declared-model definition, so by [F5] its outcome law in a declared sector preparation ρ is μρ(B)=tr⁡(ρEHNσ(B)); for the pure preparation of a sector basis vector Ψ of step 2.1, E({λ})Ψ=Ψ and hence μΨ is the point mass at λ. By [F5] and step 2.1 each such Ψ is an eigenvector of the generator, so its pure preparation is stationary under the flow U(t)=exp⁡(−itHNσ/ℏ) with Ψ(t)=e−itλ/ℏΨ, and the energy law of any preparation is the finite spectral law in the sector basis. This proves (d).

4.1F3F4step 2.1step 3.1algebra

[Extreme energies and ground eigenspace] Work on a nonzero sector. For σ=−, each configuration selects N distinct eigenvalues, so its energy is at least the sum of the N smallest and at most the sum of the N largest; these bounds are attained by the corresponding subsets. Thus E0=∑k=1Nε(k) and Emax⁡=∑k=d−N+1dε(k). A minimizing subset contains every mode with energy strictly below ε(N), contains no mode with energy strictly above ε(N), and fills its remaining places with modes at that boundary energy; this includes all choices allowed by degeneracy. For σ=+, the identity ∑jλj=N gives Nε(1)≤∑jλjεj≤Nε(d); the two bounds are attained by putting all particles in a minimum-energy or maximum-energy mode respectively. Equality at the lower bound holds exactly when every occupied mode has energy ε(1). Finally expand a unit vector in the orthonormal sector basis of step 3.1: ψ=∑λcλbλ, ∑λ∣cλ∣2=1. Then ⟨HNσψ,ψ⟩−E0=∑λ∣cλ∣2(λλ−E0)≥0, with equality exactly when all coefficients at energies greater than E0 vanish, that is, exactly on the ground eigenspace. Together with step 3.1 this proves (c).

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 3.2∎

[Conclusion and scope] Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove (a) and (b), steps 3.1 and 4.1 prove (c) and step 3.2 proves (d). The argument used the finite-mode idealization, the declared non-interacting h and the finite-dimensional spectral and tensor calculus; no interaction, spatial realization, infinite mode family, thermal state, equilibration or laboratory identification entered, which is (e).

Remarks

  • Basis independence. The eigenvalues λJ and λλ depend on the eigenvalue list of h, not on the choice of eigenbasis; a degenerate one-particle eigenvalue contributes with its multiplicity through the distinct configurations.
  • Fermionic emptiness. For σ=− and N>d the antisymmetric sector is zero: the algebraic partition trace is 0, while there are no sector states, no ground eigenvalue and no normalized density. The observable and stationarity readings of clause (d) apply only to nonzero sectors.
  • Energy reference. The bounds in (c) permit arbitrary real one-particle energies. If all configuration energies are nonnegative, then ZN≤MNσ; this count-only upper bound is not valid for unrestricted negative energies. Shifting every one-particle energy by a∈R multiplies ZN by e−βNa and shifts both extreme energies by Na.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources