Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Slater direct and exchange calculation

Statement

Slot convention. For ℓ≥1, Sℓ acts on {0,…,ℓ−1} as in Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power. On one-based tuple positions use π^(k):=1+π(k−1) for 1≤k≤ℓ. Conjugation by k↦k−1 gives πσ^=π^∘σ^ and π−1^=π^−1; thus the supplier's tensor action becomes Uπ(v1⊗⋯⊗vℓ)=vπ^−1(1)⊗⋯⊗vπ^−1(ℓ). The parameters of Uπ and sgn⁡(π) remain canonical zero-based permutations.

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let H be a complex Hilbert space with completed tensor powers H⊗n and symmetric projections P±(n) (Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases, Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power). Then:

(a) Slater vectors: for n≥2 and orthonormal u1,…,un∈H, the Slater vector S(u1,…,un):=1n!∑σ∈Snsgn⁡(σ) uσ^(1)⊗⋯⊗uσ^(n) satisfies ∥S(u1,…,un)∥=1 and S(u1,…,un)=n! P−(n)(u1⊗⋯⊗un);

(b) exclusion: if ui=uj for some i≠j, then P−(n)(u1⊗⋯⊗un)=0 (Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power (d));

(c) two orbitals, bounded pair interaction: let u,v∈L2(R3;C) be normalized and orthogonal, let W:R3→R be measurable and bounded with W(−z)=W(z) for a.e. z, let Θ:L2(R3)⊗L2(R3)→L2(R6) be the Euclidean product unitary (Euclidean L² product unitary: L²(R^a)⊗̂L²(R^b) ≅ L²(R^{a+b})), put φ±:=(u⊗v±v⊗u)/2 and D:=∫R6∣u(x)∣2∣v(y)∣2W(x−y) dx dy,X:=∫R6u(x)‾v(x)u(y)v(y)‾ W(x−y) dx dy, integrals of absolutely integrable functions. Then D,X∈R and the pair expectation of the multiplier MW in the two spatial states is ⟨MW(Θφ±),Θφ±⟩=D±X.

(d) repulsive Coulomb exchange: let κ>0, W(z)=κ/∣z∣, let u,v∈W1,2(R3;C)∩L2 be normalized and orthogonal (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions). The vectors Θφ± belong to D(MW): Hardy translated in the y variable and Tonelli give ∬∣u(x)v(y)∣2/∣x−y∣2≤4∥u∥22∥∇v∥22<∞, and the swapped product has the same property. Then the integrals D and X converge absolutely, 0≤D<∞, X∈R with X≥0; consequently D−X≤D+X, i.e. the antisymmetric spatial pair state has the lower expectation of the repulsive Coulomb pair interaction.

The exchange calculation is a statement about the indicated spatial vectors; it does not deduce the spin-statistics assignment of any species, and combining the spatial states with spin requires a separately stipulated symmetry rule. No physical interpretation of D, X or the states is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: orthonormal vectors u1,…,un∈H, normalized orthogonal u,v∈L2(R3;C), a bounded measurable even W, the pair multiplier MW on L2(R6), the numbers D,X, and κ>0.

[F1]

The permutation unitaries satisfy Uπ(v1⊗⋯⊗vn)=vπ^−1(1)⊗⋯⊗vπ^−1(n), P−(n)=1n!∑πsgn⁡(π)Uπ, and P−(n)(u1⊗⋯⊗un)=0 whenever two of the ui coincide; elementary tensors have norm ∥v1⊗⋯⊗vn∥=∥v1∥⋯∥vn∥ (Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power, Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases).

[F2]

Cauchy-Schwarz and the L2 product structure: for f,g∈L2, ∥fg∥1≤∥f∥2∥g∥2, and for bounded measurable W, ∣W(x−y)∣≤∥W∥∞ (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).

[F3]

Hardy for W1,2(R3): ∥w/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇w∥2 (Three-dimensional Hardy bound (c)).

[F4]

Gaussian integrals and transforms: ∫Re−s2ds=π; for t>0 the Euclidean Fourier transform of Gt(x):=e−t∣x∣2 is Gt^(ξ)=(π/t)3/2e−π2∣ξ∣2/t>0; the identity 1/r=π−1/2∫0∞s−1/2e−sr2ds for r>0 follows by the substitution s=u2/r2 (The Gaussian integral ∫−∞∞e−x2 dx=π, Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization, Plancherel theorem).

[F5]

Tonelli for σ-finite product spaces permits the interchange of the order of integration for nonnegative measurable integrands (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F6]

The Euclidean product unitary Θ satisfies Θ(f⊗g)(x,y)=f(x)g(y); because MW acts on L2(R6), the spatial pairing is ⟨MWΘ(f⊗g),Θ(f′⊗g′)⟩=∫f(x)g(y)W(x−y)f′(x)g′(y)‾ dx dy, in the inner product linear in the first argument (Euclidean L² product unitary: L²(R^a)⊗̂L²(R^b) ≅ L²(R^{a+b})). Once Tonelli establishes absolute integrability, Fubini applies separately to real and imaginary parts (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

Proof

1.1F1algebra

[Slater norm and identity] For σ,π∈Sn, the tensor inner product is ⟨uσ^(1)⊗⋯⊗uσ^(n),uπ^(1)⊗⋯⊗uπ^(n)⟩=∏i=1n⟨uσ^(i),uπ^(i)⟩ by [F1], which equals 1 if σ=π and 0 otherwise because the ui are orthonormal. Hence the n! summands of n!S are mutually orthogonal of norm 1, so ∥n!S∥2=n! and ∥S∥=1. Moreover P−(n)(u1⊗⋯⊗un)=1n!∑πsgn⁡(π)uπ^(1)⊗⋯⊗uπ^(n)=1n!S, using Uπ(u1⊗⋯⊗un)=uπ^−1(1)⊗⋯⊗uπ^−1(n) and reindexing π↦π−1. This proves (a).

1.2F1

[Exclusion] The assertion (b) is exactly [F1]'s vanishing statement for P−(n) on a tensor with two equal factors; in particular for n=2, P−(2)(u⊗u)=0.

1.3F2F6algebra

[Two-orbital expansion] Assume the hypotheses of (c). Absolute integrability of the four products ∣u(x)∣2∣v(y)∣2∣W(x−y)∣, ∣u(x)‾v(x)u(y)v(y)‾W(x−y)∣,… follows from [F2]: e.g. ∫∫∣u(x)∣2∣v(y)∣2∣W∣≤∥W∥∞∥u∥22∥v∥22=∥W∥∞ and ∫∫∣u‾v∣ ∣uv‾∣∣W∣≤∥W∥∞(∫∣uv∣)2≤∥W∥∞∥u∥22∥v∥22. Expanding the four terms in the tensor representation of [F6] gives ⟨MWΘφ±,Θφ±⟩=12[D±2Re⁡X+D′], where D′=∫∫∣v(x)∣2∣u(y)∣2W(x−y); replacing (x,y) by (y,x) and using W(x−y)=W(y−x) gives D′=D, so the expectation is D±Re⁡X. Since W is real and even, exchanging the two integration variables in X shows X=X‾, so X∈R and Re⁡X=X; the same symmetry with real W gives D∈R. This proves (c).

1.4F3F5algebra

[Absolute convergence for the Coulomb kernel] Assume the hypotheses of (d). For the direct term, by [F3] applied in the y-variable for a.e. x and Cauchy-Schwarz, ∫∣v(y)∣2/∣x−y∣ dy≤2∥v∥2∥∇v∥2<∞, so with Tonelli [F5] ∫∫∣u(x)∣2∣v(y)∣2∣x−y∣=∫∣u(x)∣2(∫∣v(y)∣2∣x−y∣dy)dx≤2∥v∥2∥∇v∥2∥u∥22<∞. For the crossed term use 2∣u(x)v(y)v(x)u(y)∣≤∣u(x)v(y)∣2+∣v(x)u(y)∣2 and the same bound to conclude ∬∣u(x)‾v(x)u(y)v(y)‾∣∣x−y∣<∞. Hence D,X are absolutely convergent and D=κ∫∫∣u∣2∣v∣2/∣x−y∣≥0.

2.1F2F4F5F6step 1.4algebra

[Gaussian positivity with only L1 data] Put f=u‾v∈L1 by [F2], with no assumption that f∈L2. Step 1.4 gives ∬∣f(x)f(y)∣/∣x−y∣<∞. The Gaussian representation [F4], Tonelli on absolute values [F5] and complex Fubini [F6] therefore give X=κπ−1/2∫0∞s−1/2Isds, where Is:=∬f(x)f(y)‾e−s∣x−y∣2dxdy. For s>0 completion of the square and the three-dimensional Gaussian integral give e−s∣x−y∣2=(4s/π)3/2∫R3e−2s∣x−z∣2e−2s∣y−z∣2dz. The triple integral of its absolute integrand is (π/(4s))3/2∬∣f(x)f(y)∣e−s∣x−y∣2dxdy≤(π/(4s))3/2∥f∥12, finite by Tonelli. Complex Fubini then yields Is=(4s/π)3/2∫R3∣∫f(x)e−2s∣x−z∣2dx∣2dz≥0. The outer integral is absolutely convergent by the first bound from step 1.4 and the Gaussian kernel identity, so X≥0 and is real. Since D≥0, the two absolutely convergent interaction expectations satisfy D−X≤D+X under the full original W1,2 hypotheses.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1algebra∎

[Conclusion and scope] Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove (a) and (b), steps 1.3 and 1.4 prove (c), and step 2.1 proves (d). The final paragraph of the statement records that the spin-statistics assignment and any physical interpretation are separate assumptions: the symmetric (+) and antisymmetric (−) spatial vectors are mathematical vectors, and combining them with spin requires a stipulated symmetry rule. This completes the proof.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources