Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The resonance model's phase-shift law, unitarity and channel cross section

Physical scope

The declared single-channel resonance model with every real resonance-centre parameter E_r and positive width Gamma: unitarity and a nonsingular phase law at positive physical energies, the full-real-axis auxiliary Lorentzian factor and its exact half-height width, and the positive-energy channel cross section with its resonance-centre value when E_r>0. Half-height locations have a physical reading only when positive. Conditional algebra of a declared model; no producing potential, decay law, lifetime or measured width or count is asserted.

Statement

Adopt the declared single-channel resonance model The declared single-channel resonance model: pole-shaped channel factor and its cross-section reading with channel label l, mass m>0, action constant ℏ>0 and parameters Er∈R, Γ>0, with the phase shift read modulo π from Sl=e2iδl and the channel cross-section reading σl(E) of that definition. Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Put y:=Γ/2>0. For every real E define the auxiliary real-axis Lorentzian factor L(E):=y2(E−Er)2+y2. This is a mathematical extension of the positive-energy phase-shift factor; physical phase shifts, k(E) and cross sections remain defined only for E>0. Then:

(a) for every E>0, ∣Sl(E)∣=1 and δl(E)=−Arg⁡(E−Er+iy)(modulo π), where for z=x+iy with y>0, Arg⁡z is the unique angle θ∈(0,π) with cos⁡θ=x/x2+y2 and sin⁡θ=y/x2+y2. Equivalently, for E≠Er one may use δl(E)=−arctan⁡(y/(E−Er)) modulo π; if E=Er>0, δl(E)=−π/2 modulo π;

(b) for every E>0, sin⁡2δl(E)=L(E). On the entire real axis, L(E) has value 1 exactly at E=Er and value 1/2 exactly at E=Er±Γ/2. Thus the full-real-axis half-height width of this factor is Γ for every real Er. A peak or half-height location is in the physical energy range only when that location is positive; the width statement itself concerns L on R;

(c) for every E>0, the channel cross-section reading is σl(E)=4πk(E)2(2l+1)L(E),k(E)=2mEℏ, read in m2. If Er>0, its value at that physical energy is σl(Er)=4πℏ22mEr(2l+1). If Er≤0, this model defines no physical cross section at Er. No maximum statement at Er is made for σl itself, whose energy dependence also contains the factor k(E)−2; no slow-variation assumption on that factor is required.

Every display is a conditional algebraic statement about the declared model; no potential producing Sl, no decay law, no lifetime and no measured quantity is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the declared single-channel resonance model with channel label l, parameters Er, Γ>0, the phase-shift and cross-section readings, and the choice hypotheses.

[F1]

The declared channel factor. For E>0, Sl(E)=E−Er−iΓ/2E−Er+iΓ/2 and Sl=e2iδl modulo π, with σl(E)=4πk(E)2(2l+1)sin⁡2δl(E) and k(E)=ℏ−12mE (The declared single-channel resonance model: pole-shaped channel factor and its cross-section reading clause (b)).

[F2]

Resonance model algebra in the cited mathematics. For the single-channel model S(E)=E−Er−iΓ/2E−Er+iΓ/2 with Γ>0, ∣S(E)∣=1 for real E and sin⁡2δ=(Γ/2)2/((E−Er)2+(Γ/2)2), and substituting into the phase-shift series gives the corresponding single-channel cross section (Partial-wave cross-section convergence clause (c)).

[F3]

The pair's channel reading. The channel cross-section reading of the pair is the summand of the phase-shift series of the partial-wave theorem, with l, δl and k read as in the resonance model (The model's partial-wave and phase-shift vocabulary for a declared central potential clause (c), Partial-wave expansion, unit-modulus channel factors and the phase-shift cross-section series clause (b)).

Proof

technique · direct; compute $|S_{l}|$ and the phase of the declared factor, then substitute the declared function into the model's channel reading

Given: the data and hypotheses of the statement and [F1]-[F3].

1.1F1givenalgebra

For any real E, write x:=E−Er and y:=Γ/2>0. Then x+iy≠0 and the purely algebraic ratio R(E):=(x−iy)/(x+iy) has modulus one because its numerator is the conjugate of its denominator. On the physical range E>0, [F1] identifies R(E)=Sl(E), proving the first part of (a). Defining R as an auxiliary real-axis rational formula does not assign k or a physical cross section outside the range E>0.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

With r:=x2+y2>0 and θ:=Arg⁡(x+iy)∈(0,π), one has x+iy=reiθ and x−iy=re−iθ, hence R(E)=e−2iθ. For E>0 the phase δl=−θ modulo π therefore matches [F1]. When x≠0, tan⁡θ=y/x and the principal arctangent gives the same angle modulo π; when x=0, θ=π/2, so the phase is −π/2 with no division by zero. This proves all of (a).

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For E>0, sin⁡2δl=sin⁡2θ=y2/(x2+y2)=L(E), in agreement with [F2]. Independently, the real-axis formula has positive denominator for every real E and satisfies 0<L(E)≤1, with equality L(E)=1 exactly when x=0. Also L(E)=1/2 if and only if x2=y2, so its two real half-height points are Er−y and Er+y, separated by 2y=Γ. Restricting a point to the physical range requires that point to be positive; the mathematical peak and width identities impose no condition such as Er>y. This proves (b).

4.1F1F3step 3.1algebra∎

For E>0, substituting step 3.1 into [F1], [F3] gives σl(E)=4π(2l+1)L(E)/k(E)2. If Er>0, this formula is defined at E=Er, where L(Er)=1 and k(Er)2=2mEr/ℏ2, yielding the displayed resonance-centre value. If Er≤0, no such physical evaluation is in the model's domain and the auxiliary L(Er)=1 does not create one. The extra factor k(E)−2 remains energy dependent, so no location-of-maximum or slow-variation assertion is used. This proves (c), retaining every real Er and positive Γ.

Remarks

  • Why no peak claim. The auxiliary real-axis Lorentzian factor peaks at Er; that peak is physical only if Er>0. The full channel reading carries the factor k(E)−2 as well; the pair states the full-real-axis half-height width of the Lorentzian factor, which is exactly Γ, without asserting where the maximum of σl lies.
  • Modulo π. Both sin⁡2 and the cross-section reading are insensitive to the modulo-π ambiguity of δl.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources