How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The resonance model's phase-shift law, unitarity and channel cross section
The declared single-channel resonance model with every real resonance-centre parameter E_r and positive width Gamma: unitarity and a nonsingular phase law at positive physical energies, the full-real-axis auxiliary Lorentzian factor and its exact half-height width, and the positive-energy channel cross section with its resonance-centre value when E_r>0. Half-height locations have a physical reading only when positive. Conditional algebra of a declared model; no producing potential, decay law, lifetime or measured width or count is asserted.
Statement
Adopt the declared single-channel resonance model The declared single-channel resonance model: pole-shaped channel factor and its cross-section reading with channel label , mass , action constant and parameters , , with the phase shift read modulo from and the channel cross-section reading of that definition. Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The Axiom of Choice). Put . For every real define the auxiliary real-axis Lorentzian factor This is a mathematical extension of the positive-energy phase-shift factor; physical phase shifts, and cross sections remain defined only for . Then:
(a) for every , and where for with , is the unique angle with and . Equivalently, for one may use modulo ; if , modulo ;
(b) for every , . On the entire real axis, has value exactly at and value exactly at . Thus the full-real-axis half-height width of this factor is for every real . A peak or half-height location is in the physical energy range only when that location is positive; the width statement itself concerns on ;
(c) for every , the channel cross-section reading is read in . If , its value at that physical energy is If , this model defines no physical cross section at . No maximum statement at is made for itself, whose energy dependence also contains the factor ; no slow-variation assumption on that factor is required.
Every display is a conditional algebraic statement about the declared model; no potential producing , no decay law, no lifetime and no measured quantity is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the declared single-channel resonance model with channel label , parameters , , the phase-shift and cross-section readings, and the choice hypotheses.
The declared channel factor. For , and modulo , with and (The declared single-channel resonance model: pole-shaped channel factor and its cross-section reading clause (b)).
Resonance model algebra in the cited mathematics. For the single-channel model with , for real and , and substituting into the phase-shift series gives the corresponding single-channel cross section (Partial-wave cross-section convergence clause (c)).
The pair's channel reading. The channel cross-section reading of the pair is the summand of the phase-shift series of the partial-wave theorem, with , and read as in the resonance model (The model's partial-wave and phase-shift vocabulary for a declared central potential clause (c), Partial-wave expansion, unit-modulus channel factors and the phase-shift cross-section series clause (b)).
Proof
Given: the data and hypotheses of the statement and [F1]-[F3].
For any real , write and . Then and the purely algebraic ratio has modulus one because its numerator is the conjugate of its denominator. On the physical range , [F1] identifies , proving the first part of (a). Defining as an auxiliary real-axis rational formula does not assign or a physical cross section outside the range .
With and , one has and , hence . For the phase modulo therefore matches [F1]. When , and the principal arctangent gives the same angle modulo ; when , , so the phase is with no division by zero. This proves all of (a).
For , , in agreement with [F2]. Independently, the real-axis formula has positive denominator for every real and satisfies , with equality exactly when . Also if and only if , so its two real half-height points are and , separated by . Restricting a point to the physical range requires that point to be positive; the mathematical peak and width identities impose no condition such as . This proves (b).
For , substituting step 3.1 into [F1], [F3] gives . If , this formula is defined at , where and , yielding the displayed resonance-centre value. If , no such physical evaluation is in the model's domain and the auxiliary does not create one. The extra factor remains energy dependent, so no location-of-maximum or slow-variation assertion is used. This proves (c), retaining every real and positive .
Remarks
- Why no peak claim. The auxiliary real-axis Lorentzian factor peaks at ; that peak is physical only if . The full channel reading carries the factor as well; the pair states the full-real-axis half-height width of the Lorentzian factor, which is exactly , without asserting where the maximum of lies.
- Modulo . Both and the cross-section reading are insensitive to the modulo- ambiguity of .
Depends on
The declared single-channel resonance model: pole-shaped channel factor and its cross-section reading
The model's partial-wave and phase-shift vocabulary for a declared central potential
Partial-wave expansion, unit-modulus channel factors and the phase-shift cross-section series
Partial-wave cross-section convergence
Dimensions, SI unit conventions and quantity types of the framework
State and composition postulate P1: Hilbert spaces, preparations and composite systems
Observable and probability postulate P2: self-adjoint observables, spectral probability and finite unsharp outcomes
Autonomous dynamics postulate P4: self-adjoint generators and unitary evolution
Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The Axiom of Choice