Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Partial-wave cross-section convergence

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let V∈L∞(R3;R) be real, bounded, central (invariant under rotations) and supported in BR, let k>0, and let fk∈C∞(S2) be the scattering amplitude of Stationary outgoing integral and flux. Then:

(a) fk depends only on cos⁡θ=Ω⋅d, and its Legendre expansion fk(θ)=12ik∑l≥0(2l+1)(Sl(k)−1)Pl(cos⁡θ) converges in L2(S2) (and absolutely, since fk is smooth), where Sl(k) is a unit-modulus number determined by the regular radial solution φl normalized by φl(r)/rl+1→1 and by the outgoing solution fl with fl(r)=ei(kr−lπ/2)(1+O(1/r)): explicitly Sl=W(φl,fl)‾/W(φl,fl) and Sl=e2iδl(k) with the phase shift δl(k) defined modulo π.

(b) ∣W(φl,fl)‾∣=∣W(φl,fl)∣, so ∣Sl∣=1, and the total cross section is σ=πk2∑l≥0(2l+1)∣Sl−1∣2=4πk2∑l≥0(2l+1)sin⁡2δl(k), the series converging because fk∈L2(S2) and the expansion in (a) is an orthogonal expansion.

(c) Resonance model. For the single-channel model Sl(E)=E−Er−iΓ/2E−Er+iΓ/2 with Γ>0 one has ∣Sl∣=1 for real E and sin⁡2δl=(Γ/2)2(E−Er)2+(Γ/2)2; substituting into (b) gives the corresponding single-channel cross section. This is a conditional model calculation, not a theorem that every potential has such a pole.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; V(x)=v(∣x∣) almost everywhere with real v∈L∞((0,∞)) and v(r)=0 for r>R; k>0; incident direction d∈S2; the stationary solution Ψ and amplitude fk of the cited stationary supplier. Set W(a,b)=ab′−a′b, where the prime denotes the radial derivative.

[F1]

The stationary construction supplies the unique u∈L2(BR) solving (I+Kk)u=eikd⋅x∣BR and its integral continuation Ψ(x)=eikd⋅x−∫BRGk(x−y)V(y)u(y)dy, with Gk(z)=eik∣z∣/(4π∣z∣), Ψ∈Hloc2(R3), (−Δ+V−k2)Ψ=0 and Ψ∣BR=u. This is uniqueness of the integral-equation construction; no uniqueness among all outgoing PDE solutions is imported. Its compact L2 source q=VΨ∣BR∈L1(BR); outside B2R, Ψsc:=Ψ−eikd⋅x satisfies Ψsc(rΩ)=eikrfk(Ω)/r+O(r−2) with the same order for the first radial derivative, and fk(Ω)=−(4π)−1∫BRe−ikΩ⋅yq(y) dy (Stationary outgoing integral and flux, Outgoing Fredholm invertibility).

[F2]

The Rodrigues polynomials Pl satisfy Pl(1)=1, have leading coefficient (2l)!/[2l(l!)2] and obey −((1−t2)Pl′)′=l(l+1)Pl (Legendre Rodrigues equation). Orthogonality and completeness of the associated angular harmonics follow from Associated Legendre function normalization, Weighted angular completeness and Sphere ONB.

[F3]

Polar volume integration is dx=r2 dr dσ (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma); smooth approximation in H2 is available under CC (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)). All radial equations below are distributional, equivalently with locally absolutely continuous function and derivative away from r=0, and bounded measurable v is sufficient (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

(Angular normalization, the plane wave and smooth amplitude.) For a rotation T∈SO(3) fixing d, let RTw(x)=w(Tx) on L2(BR). Rotation preserves the ball and Lebesgue measure, so RT is unitary. Substituting y=Tz in the kernel integral and using Gk(T(x−z))=Gk(x−z) and V(Tz)=V(z) almost everywhere gives RTKk=KkRT. Also RTed=ed. Thus (I+Kk)RTu=ed=(I+Kk)u, and invertibility in [F1] gives RTu=u. Applying the same substitution to the integral continuation and the amplitude integral yields Ψ(Tx)=Ψ(x) and fk(TΩ)=fk(Ω). Only integral-equation uniqueness is used. Thus these functions depend on the angle only through t=Ω⋅d. The amplitude is genuinely smooth without differentiating v: the source q is compactly supported and in L1, and every angular derivative of e−ikΩ⋅y is bounded on S2×BR, so differentiation under this integral gives derivatives of every order. Rodrigues integration by parts l times gives ∫−11Pl(t)2 dt=(2l)!/[22l(l!)2]∫−11(1−t2)l dt=2/(2l+1); the last integral follows from I0=2 and Il=2lIl−1/(2l+1) by one integration by parts. Consequently ∫S2Pl(Ω⋅d)Pn(Ω⋅d) dσ=4πδln/(2l+1). Define j0(z)=sin⁡z/z, y0(z)=−cos⁡z/z, and recursively jl+1=ljl/z−jl′, yl+1=lyl/z−yl′ for z>0. Rodrigues integration by parts also gives ∫−11eiztPl(t) dt=2iljl(z): the resulting expression is ilzl/(2ll!)∫−11eizt(1−t2)l dt, whose quotient by 2il equals jl(z) by induction using the displayed recurrence and integration by parts in t. Therefore the orthogonal angular expansion of the plane wave is eikrt=∑l≥0(2l+1)iljl(kr)Pl(t) in L2(S2) for each fixed r. In particular the normalization of Pl, of the incident coefficients and of the spherical Bessel functions has been derived rather than imported from a Coulomb spectral transform.

1.2givenF2F3algebra

(Regular solution for a bounded measurable radial potential.) For fixed l set Q(r)=v(r)−k2 and seek φl=rl+1hl. The equation −φl′′+[l(l+1)/r2+v(r)]φl=k2φl is equivalent to (r2l+2hl′)′=r2l+2Qhl. Its normalized regular solution is the Volterra equation hl(r)=1+12l+1∫0rt[1−(t/r)2l+1]Q(t)hl(t) dt. On every [0,L], the kernel has absolute value at most Mt/(2l+1) with M=∥Q∥L∞(0,L), so the nth iterated integral is bounded by [Mr2/(2(2l+1))]n/n!. The resulting uniformly convergent series gives a continuous real solution, and applying the same estimate to differences proves uniqueness; solutions constructed on different finite intervals agree. Differentiating the integral gives hl′(r)=r−2l−2∫0rt2l+2Q(t)hl(t) dt, whence hl=1+O(r2), hl′=O(r) as r↓0, and φl,φl′ are locally absolutely continuous with the radial equation valid almost everywhere. Conversely a solution with φl/rl+1→1 has no integration constant in r2l+2hl′ (a nonzero constant would make hl unbounded near zero), so it satisfies this Volterra equation. Near zero hl≠0, and reduction of order gives an independent solution φl(r)∫r0rφl(t)−2 dt with leading nonzero term proportional to r−l. Such a branch is incompatible with the local H2 stationary domain: for l≥1 its reduced coefficient is not in L2(dr) near zero, while for l=0 its unreduced coefficient has a nonzero 1/r term with radial derivative proportional to r−2 and is not locally H1(R3). Thus every projected radial channel of the Hloc2 stationary solution is a multiple of this regular φl. Projection and the radial equation are justified on compact annuli by smooth approximation, the polar Laplacian identity and angular integration by parts; the angular eigenfunction identity follows with the negative derivative sign in [F2]. No derivative of v or regularity stronger than boundedness has entered.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

(Outgoing normalization and nonzero Wronskians.) Put Jl(z)=zjl(z) and Ql 0(z)=zyl(z); the superscript distinguishes this free solution from the potential coefficient Q. Their recurrence is ul+1=(l+1)ul/z−ul′. Differentiation shows that this sends u′′+[1−l(l+1)/z2]u=0 to the same equation with l replaced by l+1. Starting with sin⁡z,−cos⁡z proves the spherical Bessel equation and the finite sine/cosine expansions Jl=sin⁡(z−lπ/2)+O(z−1), Ql 0=−cos⁡(z−lπ/2)+O(z−1), with differentiated errors of the same order. Their z-Wronskian is constant and has limit 1, hence equals 1. Define the outgoing solution exactly for r≥R by fl(r)=ik r[jl(kr)+iyl(kr)]; then fl=ei(kr−lπ/2)(1+O(r−1)) and fl′=ik ei(kr−lπ/2)+O(r−1), while f‾l is the incoming solution and W(f‾l,fl)=2ik. Extend fl inward to every interval [a,R], a>0, by its continuous Cauchy data at R and the bounded-coefficient integral equation for the first-order radial system; its convergent successive-integration series provides existence and uniqueness. At jumps of v, function and derivative remain continuous and locally absolutely continuous, so there is no unmatched interface term. For solutions of this equation the Wronskian has derivative zero almost everywhere. In the exterior write the real regular solution as φl=alfl+blf‾l, where al=b‾l, and set Wl=W(φl,fl)=2ikbl. This cannot vanish: it would imply bl=al=0 and then φl=0 by Cauchy uniqueness, contrary to its origin normalization. Therefore Sl=W‾l/Wl=−al/bl is well-defined and ∣Sl∣=1; writing Sl=e2iδl defines δl modulo π. For V=0, the Volterra regular solution is φl=(2l+1)!! k−lrjl(kr), since jl(z)∼zl/(2l+1)!! at zero from the integral formula in step 1.1. Here Wl=−(2l+1)!! k−l is real, so Sl=1, verifying the free normalization and its sign.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1F1F2algebra

(Matching one channel without exchanging infinite limits.) Define the zonal coefficient cl(r)=(2l+1)(4π)−1∫S2Ψ(rΩ)Pl(Ω⋅d) dσ and the reduced coefficient ul=rcl. By step 1.2, ul is a multiple of φl; outside the support it is a combination of fl,f‾l. The incident reduced coefficient is (2l+1)ilrjl(kr)=(2l+1)il(fl−f‾l)/(2ik). The scattered reduced coefficient is purely outgoing: projecting the uniform far-field and derivative bounds in [F1] gives ulsc=eikrcl(fk)+O(r−1) and (ulsc)′−ik ulsc=O(r−1) for this fixed l; since the incoming component Bf‾l would contribute −2ikBe−i(kr−lπ/2)+O(r−1), its coefficient is zero. Thus the total incoming coefficient remains −(2l+1)il/(2ik). The outgoing/incoming ratio of the regular solution in step 2.1 is −Sl, so ul=(2l+1)il(Slfl−f‾l)/(2ik) and ulsc=(2l+1)il(Sl−1)fl/(2ik). Comparing the fixed-channel far field and using ile−ilπ/2=1 yields cl(fk)=(2l+1)(Sl−1)/(2ik), which is the claimed Legendre coefficient. This uses no unproved global radial spectral transform and no interchange between an infinite channel sum and a large-r expansion.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1F2algebra

(Convergence of the full series.) Completeness in [F2] first gives fk=∑lcl(fk)Pl in L2(S2). For l≥1, repeated integration by parts on the smooth compact sphere gives [l(l+1)]Ncl(fk)=(2l+1)(4π)−1∫S2(−ΔS2)Nfk Pl dσ, hence ∣cl(fk)∣≤CN2l+1 [l(l+1)]−N by Cauchy–Schwarz and the norm computed in step 1.1. All these derivatives exist by the compact-source differentiation argument there; no smoothness of v is required. Also ∣Pl(t)∣≤1 for −1≤t≤1: the finite-binomial expansion of π−1∫0π(t+i1−t2cos⁡s)l ds is the Rodrigues polynomial Pl(t), while the modulus of the integrand is at most one. Choosing N≥2 therefore gives ∑lsup⁡∣t∣≤1∣cl(fk)Pl(t)∣<∞, including the finite l=0 term. The series is consequently absolutely and uniformly convergent, and its limit agrees with the L2 expansion and hence everywhere with the smooth amplitude. With step 3.1 these coefficients give the complete expansion in (a).

5.1step 2.1step 4.1algebra

(Cross section with the exact Legendre norm.) Orthogonality and Parseval give σ=∫S2∣fk∣2 dσ=∑l≥0∣cl(fk)∣2 4π/(2l+1)=πk−2∑l≥0(2l+1)∣Sl−1∣2. The factor is 4π/(2l+1), because the azimuthal integral 2π multiplies the Legendre norm 2/(2l+1). Since ∣Sl−1∣2=4sin⁡2δl, this is also 4πk−2∑l(2l+1)sin⁡2δl. Both series converge by the already established L2 expansion. In the free test V=0, every Sl=1 and the amplitude and total cross section both vanish. This proves (b) with the stated normalization.

6.1step 5.1algebra∎

(Retained resonance-model calculation.) For the conditional scalar model let x=E−Er and a=Γ/2>0. Then Sl(E)=(x−ia)/(x+ia) has modulus one for every real E and Sl−1=−2ia/(x+ia), so ∣Sl−1∣2=4a2/(x2+a2) and sin⁡2δl=a2/(x2+a2). Substitution in the single-channel term of step 5.1 gives σl(E)=4π(2l+1)k−2a2/[(E−Er)2+a2] at the wave number assigned to that model energy (in the normalization H0=−Δ, k=E for E>0). The peak phase factor at E=Er is Sl=−1 and the phase-shift factor reaches one; this is a conditional model calculation, with no assertion that a generic compact potential has this pole or that k is defined by E for negative E. This retains (c) and completes the proof.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources