How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stationary outgoing integral and flux
Statement
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , let with , let and . On let , where . The supplier Outgoing Fredholm invertibility supplies bounded invertibility of . Define
Then:
(a) , distributionally, and .
(b) With , , the smooth amplitude
satisfies . The error and its first radial derivative are bounded uniformly in by . For every fixed finite product of smooth tangential differential operators on , also .
(c) Fix normalization constants . The scattered radial current is
uniformly in . With incident plane-wave flux density , the stationary elastic model's differential cross section is
These are conditional model statements. Measured count rates additionally require incident fluence, target and detector acceptance, efficiency and background modelling; none is asserted. Part (a) is a local regularity statement for a stationary scattering wave, with no assertion of membership in the global operator domain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the operator , the vectors/functions , and the positive current-normalization constants .
Fredholm conclusion: for every real bounded compact and every , is a bounded bijection of (Outgoing Fredholm invertibility). Invertibility here concerns , never itself.
Interior regularity Interior regularity for divergence-form equations: a weak solution with local Laplacian is ; the spaces are those of Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms. For and , weighted Cauchy-Schwarz and Tonelli give , because .
Proof
Actual source and local regularity: [F1] makes . Therefore , zero-extended outside the ball, belongs to with and . On a fixed bounded -region only bounded-radius values of and enter their convolutions with ; those restricted kernels are in , since and near zero. Apply the explicit estimate [F2] to the function and each distributional first derivative to obtain . Radial differentiation away from zero gives , and integration over a shrinking sphere gives the delta mass from ; thus distributionally. Consequently . Both and are locally square integrable, so and [F2] gives . The defining equation identifies on , hence everywhere and . This proves (a), without an arbitrary- regularity assertion.
Uniform smooth far-field kernel: set and . For and , ; the quotient extends smoothly to by the identity , with value there. Define using that extension. Then and . All fixed-order and angular derivatives of are uniformly bounded on this compact parameter set. The fundamental theorem in gives ; the same formula after any bounds its angular derivatives by . Integrating against proves smoothness of by dominated differentiation and gives with all stated angular error bounds. Differentiating this exact formula in produces the three factors , and multiplying respectively , that same difference, and ; their bounds give . This proves (b), including derivative control, directly from the actual compact source.
Direct scattered current: step 2.1 gives and uniformly on the sphere. Their product is , since is bounded and each error is . Taking its imaginary part and multiplying by yields the claimed . Independently, for the vector current is , so incident flux through a plane normal to is . Dividing the scattered flux per asymptotic solid angle by that incident density gives . Uniform convergence allows integration over the finite-area sphere, giving . No incident/scattered interference term enters this scattered-component computation, and no assertion that such terms average away is needed. Parts (a)-(c) follow.