Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Outgoing Fredholm invertibility

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let R>0, let V∈L∞(R3;R) with supp⁡V⊆BR, and put H=L2(BR;C). For k>0 define

Kkf(x)=∫BReik∣x−y∣V(y)f(y)4π∣x−y∣ dy.

Then Kk is compact and I+Kk is boundedly invertible. In particular ∥(I+Kk)f∥2≥∥(I+Kk)−1∥−1∥f∥2. Moreover, on every interval [a,b]⊂(0,∞) the inverses are operator-norm continuous and uniformly bounded. Writing Kζ for the same kernel with complex wave number ζ, there is δ>0 such that I+Kζ is invertible whenever dist⁡(ζ,[a,b])<δ; its inverses are uniformly bounded there and converge in operator norm to the outgoing real-axis inverses as ζ→k∈[a,b]. For incoming kernels replace eik∣x−y∣ by e−ik∣x−y∣; the same conclusions hold. No zero-energy or high-energy uniform bound is claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the real bounded compact potential V, R>0, k>0, and H=L2(BR;C); all integrals use Lebesgue measure.

[F1]

The concrete CC kernel lemma L^2 kernel operators are bounded and compact bounds operator norm by product-L2 kernel norm and proves compactness by finite rectangular-product kernels. Apply it after zero extension from BR×BR to R6, followed by restriction to BR. This uses its actual finite-rank approximation, not a general Hilbert-Schmidt theorem or a choice of an arbitrary Hilbert basis.

[F2]

Interior regularity Interior H2 regularity for divergence-form equations: a weak Hloc1 solution of −Δu=g∈Lloc2 belongs to Hloc2. Fourier Plancherel Plancherel theorem gives the global implication u,Δu∈L2⇒u∈H2, since (1+∣p∣2)2≤2(1+∣p∣4).

[F3]

Positive-eigenvalue exclusion: for every real bounded compactly supported V, every k>0, and every u∈H2(R3) satisfying (−Δ+V−k2)u=0, one has u=0 (No positive compact-potential eigenvalues). Its exact UCP prerequisite is: on connected open Ω, an Hloc2 solution of Δu=Bu, with complex B∈Lloc∞(Ω), vanishing on a nonempty open subset vanishes throughout Ω (Bounded-potential weak UCP).

Proof

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

Concrete kernel approximation: put hk(x,y)=eik∣x−y∣V(y)/(4π∣x−y∣) on BR×BR, zero elsewhere. Its squared norm is at most ∥V∥∞2∣BR∣(16π2)−1∫∣z∣<2R∣z∣−2dz<∞. Thus [F1] gives boundedness, compactness and finite-rank approximation on H. More explicitly, enumerate the rational complex box-step functions restricted to BR, and apply Gram-Schmidt in that order, discarding zero remainders; this uniquely specifies an orthonormal basis (ej) because the original enumeration is dense. The product basis ei(x)ej(y)‾ is complete in product L2: rectangular simple functions are dense by the same kernel lemma's box approximation, and approximation of each factor approximates each finite product. Its finite square partial sums hk,n=∑i,j≤naijei(x)ej(y)‾, with aij=∫hk(x,y)ei(x)‾ej(y)dxdy, converge in kernel norm. The associated Fn has range in span⁡{e1,…,en} and ∥Kk−Fn∥≤∥hk−hk,n∥2→0. Select the least n making this bound smaller than 1/2. No maximal-family or arbitrary-basis selection occurs.

1.2F2givenconstructalgebra

Local Green regularity: for g=Vf zero-extended from BR, one has g∈L2∩L1 with compact support. Set u=−Gk∗g, Gk(z)=eik∣z∣/(4π∣z∣). On any fixed bounded x-region the convolution and its first weak derivatives use bounded-radius restrictions of Gk and ∇Gk; both are in L1, because their singularities are ∣z∣−1 and ∣z∣−2. The bound ∥q∗g∥2≤∥q∥1∥g∥2 follows by weighted Cauchy-Schwarz ∣∫q(z)g(x−z)dz∣2≤∥q∥1∫∣q(z)∣∣g(x−z)∣2dz and integration in x. Hence u∈Hloc1. Direct radial differentiation away from zero gives (−Δ−k2)Gk=0 there, while integration over a shrinking sphere gives the unit delta coefficient from −∂r(1/(4πr)); the locally integrable remainder tends to zero. Thus (−Δ−k2)Gk=δ0 distributionally and (−Δ−k2)u=−g. The right side and u are locally square integrable, so [F2] gives u∈Hloc2. This argument requires the actual L2 source, and makes no assertion for arbitrary compact L1 sources.

2.1F2F3step 1.2algebra

Kernel-to-eigenfunction and flux: suppose (I+Kk)f=0 and use u from step 1.2. On BR one has u=−Kkf=f, hence g=Vu and (−Δ+V−k2)u=0 globally. For r>2R, Taylor expansion uniformly for y∈BR gives Gk(rω−y)=eikre−ikω⋅y/(4πr)+O(r−2) and ∂rGk(rω−y)=ikeikre−ikω⋅y/(4πr)+O(r−2). Integrating against g∈L1 yields u(rω)=eikrA(ω)/r+O(r−2) and ∂ru(rω)=ikeikrA(ω)/r+O(r−2), where A(ω)=−(4π)−1∫e−ikω⋅yg(y)dy is smooth because all y-moments are integrable. The weak Green identity, justified by Hloc2 and radial cutoffs (the solution is smooth outside BR), gives Im⁡∫∣x∣=ru‾ ∂ru dS=0: its interior integral is ∫Br(∣∇u∣2+(V−k2)∣u∣2), which is real. Substituting the expansions gives 0=k∫S2∣A∣2dσ+O(r−1), so A=0. Consequently u=O(r−2) at infinity and u∈L2(R3). Its equation gives Δu=(V−k2)u∈L2, so the global Fourier criterion [F2] gives u∈H2. The exact repaired positive-eigenvalue conclusion [F3] then yields u=0 and f=0. Thus I+Kk is injective, by that supplier.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

Explicit finite-rank inversion: take F=Fn from step 1.1 and write E=Kk−F, L=I+E. Since ∥E∥<1/2, the series L−1=∑m≥0(−E)m converges in operator norm, is a two-sided inverse, and has norm at most 2. Put T=L−1F and B=I+T, so I+Kk=LB. The subspace Y=ran⁡T is finite dimensional. Obtain an orthonormal basis of Y by Gram-Schmidt on the finite list L−1e1,…,L−1en after applying the finite coefficient matrix of F, discarding zero vectors; thus the orthogonal projection PY is a finite sum of coordinate pairings. Because T(H)⊆Y, B(Y)⊆Y; injectivity of I+Kk from step 2.1 makes B∣Y injective and therefore bijective by finite-dimensional linear algebra. Given h∈H, put z=(I−PY)h and y=(B∣Y)−1(PYh−Tz). Then B(z+y)=z+Tz+By=h. These finite matrix and projection operations are bounded; explicitly ∥z+y∥≤[1+∥(B∣Y)−1∥(1+∥T∥)]∥h∥. Hence B−1 and (I+Kk)−1=B−1L−1 are bounded. If Y={0} the same formula means B=I. This proves full surjectivity and the lower bound without a Banach Fredholm alternative, kernel/range-chain selection or DC.

4.1F1step 3.1algebra∎

Uniform positive-energy boundary: for ζ,η in a bounded complex neighborhood of [a,b], with ∣Im⁡ζ∣,∣Im⁡η∣≤1, the integral mean-value identity gives ∣eiζd−eiηd∣≤de2R∣ζ−η∣ for 0≤d≤2R. Thus ∥Kζ−Kη∥≤∥hζ−hη∥2≤CR∥V∥∞∣ζ−η∣. At each real k>0, step 3.1 gives Ak=(I+Kk)−1; whenever ∥Ak(Kζ−Kk)∥<1/2, the factorization I+Kζ=(I+Kk)[I+Ak(Kζ−Kk)] and its Neumann inverse give ∥(I+Kζ)−1∥≤2∥Ak∥ and continuity at k. In particular k↦Ak is continuous on [a,b], so M=max⁡k∈[a,b]∥Ak∥<∞. Choose δ<1 with CR∥V∥∞Mδ<1/2 (if V=0, any δ<1 works). For any ζ at distance less than δ from the interval, choose its nearest real point k∈[a,b] by the explicit clipping formula; the same factorization gives invertibility, bound 2M, and convergence to Ak in operator norm. Energy z=ζ2 with the outgoing square-root branch near [a2,b2] therefore has the same compact-positive-energy boundary behavior. Complex conjugation Cf=f‾ satisfies CKkC=K−k because V is real, so incoming real-axis inverses and their boundary limits have the same bounds. All original claims and the stated compact-positive-energy uniformity follow.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources