How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded-potential weak UCP
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be open and connected, let , and let satisfy in the distributional sense on (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms). If almost everywhere on some nonempty open subset of , then almost everywhere on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice; a connected open set ; ; satisfying distributionally and vanishing almost everywhere on a nonempty open subset.
The space consists of functions whose weak derivatives through order two are square integrable on every relatively compact open subset. For , , extended by zero outside , belongs to and . These product identities follow by integration against test functions; the right-hand terms are in on the cutoff support (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
For integer , , and compactly supported functions vanishing near , the Carleman estimate is , (Radial Carleman estimate). Translation gives the same estimate about any center , with .
Proof
Let have some neighborhood on which almost everywhere. Choose any with ; no vanishing on this larger ball is assumed. Take a smooth cutoff supported in , equal to one on , and put , . By [F1], is compactly supported , , and has support in , where . The initial known zero neighborhood ensures that vanishes near , exactly as required by [F2]. Local boundedness on the compact ball gives .
Set , . All weighted norms are finite since vanishes near the center. The estimate [F2] and the triangle inequality give . On the support of one has , so the first norm is at most . For every integer this term can be absorbed, giving . Since and is supported where , its norm is bounded by . This absorption uses only the modulus of the complex function .
Fix . On the cutoff is one and , hence for all integers from step 2.1. The cutoff and are fixed independently of . Because , the right-hand side tends to zero as , proving almost everywhere on . Exhausting by a countable sequence of such balls proves vanishing almost everywhere on . Thus any initially known zero neighborhood at a center expands to this ball for every admissible , irrespective of the size of the initial neighborhood.
Choose an initial point in the given nonempty zero open subset, and let be arbitrary. There is a finite polygonal path from to : the subset reachable from by such paths is relatively open, since a small ball around each reachable point permits an extra line segment; its complement is relatively open by the same ball argument, and connectedness forces the reachable subset to be all of . The compact image of has a positive distance from when that complement is nonempty; if choose any positive distance parameter. Choose a fixed smaller than this distance, so for every . Uniform continuity of the finite polygonal path supplies a finite partition with .
Apply step 3.1 at to establish vanishing on . Inductively, if vanishing is established on , the next center lies strictly inside this ball and therefore has a zero neighborhood. Step 4.1 with the same radius then establishes vanishing on . Finitely many applications prove vanishing in a neighborhood of . Thus the open union of zero neighborhoods is all of . To conclude a single almost-everywhere assertion on , use the countable base of rational balls: all rational balls contained in some such neighborhood cover , and vanishes almost everywhere on each of them. Their countable union has a null exceptional set. Only finite path constructions and countable approximation or null-set unions were used; no additional regularity, real-valuedness of , or stronger choice hypothesis is required.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- D. Jerison and C. E. Kenig, Unique continuation and absence of positive eigenvalues for Schrodinger operators, Annals of Mathematics 121 (1985) 463-494 (weak unique continuation for bounded potentials via Carleman weights)
- H. Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Chapter 9 (local H^2 calculus and cut-off products)