Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weighted angular completeness

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let Pl be the Legendre polynomials of Legendre Rodrigues equation and wlm the associated functions of Associated Legendre function normalization, and let L2=L2((−1,1),dt;C) with inner product linear in the first argument (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions). Then, for each fixed m∈N:

(a) for every l≥m the polynomial Pl(m) has degree l−m and nonzero leading coefficient, and for every d∈N the polynomials Pm(m),Pm+1(m),…,Pm+d(m) form a basis of the space of polynomial functions of degree at most d on [−1,1];

(b) the family (wlm)l≥m has dense linear span in L2: if f∈L2 satisfies ∫−11f(t)wlm(t) dt=0 for every l≥m, then f=0 almost everywhere; consequently the orthogonal family (wlm)l≥m is complete in L2 and its normalization (wlm/∥wlm∥2)l≥m is a Hilbert basis of L2, so every f∈L2 has f=∑l≥m(∫−11f wlm dt)∥wlm∥2−2wlm with the finite-subset-net convergence of Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases;

(c) for every fixed m the orthogonal projection of L2 onto the one-dimensional span of wmm is f↦∥wmm∥2−2(∫−11f wmm dt)wmm, and wmm(t)=(−1)m(2m)!2mm!(1−t2)m/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: m∈N; the Legendre polynomials Pl; the functions wlm; the complex Hilbert space L2((−1,1),dt).

[F1]

Pl is a polynomial of degree l with nonzero leading coefficient al=(2l)!2l(l!)2 (Legendre Rodrigues equation). Iterating the monomial derivative rule (For a natural n≥1 the function x↦xn is differentiable everywhere with derivative ι(n) x n−1; for n=0 it is the constant 1, with derivative 0; for a natural n≥1 the function x↦x−n is differentiable at every x≠0 with derivative −ι(n) x−n−1; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term) and factorial recursion (The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N) gives, for l≥m, leading term all!/(l−m)! tl−m in Pl(m); lower-degree terms either vanish or have smaller degree. Thus its degree is l−m, and Pm(m)=amm!.

[F2]

wlm=(−1)m(1−t2)m/2Pl(m) is continuous on [−1,1], the family (wlm)l≥m is orthogonal in L2, and ∥wlm∥22=∫−11wlm2 dt∈(0,∞) (Associated Legendre function normalization).

[F3]

The real polynomial functions are uniformly dense in the real continuous functions on [−1,1]: for every continuous g:[−1,1]→R and every ε>0 there is a polynomial p with sup⁡[−1,1]∣g−p∣<ε (Real Stone–Weierstrass theorem for compact Hausdorff spaces).

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, for every bounded interval (a,b) the complex continuous functions on [a,b] are dense in complex Lp((a,b)) for 1≤p<+∞, in particular in L2 (Continuous functions are dense in Lp of finite tori and of bounded intervals (2)). For continuous g, integrating ∣g(t)∣2≤∥g∥∞2 over (a,b) gives ∥g∥22≤(b−a)∥g∥∞2, hence ∥g∥2≤b−a∥g∥∞ by the defining L2 norm (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).

[F5]

∥fg∥1≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 and ∣∫fg‾∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 in L2 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).

[F6]

For a family that is orthonormal and complete in a Hilbert space, the expansion, Parseval identity and coefficient formulas hold with finite-subset-net convergence (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family).

Proof

1.1F1algebra

[(a)] By [F1], Pl(m) has degree l−m and nonzero leading coefficient for each l≥m. Hence in the ordered list Pm(m),Pm+1(m),…,Pm+d(m) the j-th polynomial has degree j, 0≤j≤d: the leading-degree matrix is triangular with nonzero diagonal, so the polynomials are linearly independent; they are d+1 vectors in the (d+1)-dimensional space of polynomials of degree at most d, hence a basis.

2.1step 1.1F2algebra

[(b), first reduction] Let f∈L2 satisfy ∫−11fwlm dt=0 for all l≥m, and put g(t):=f(t)(1−t2)m/2. Since t↦(1−t2)m/2 is continuous and bounded on [−1,1], g∈L2 and ∥g∥2≤∥f∥2; moreover for every l≥m, ∫−11g Pl(m) dt=(−1)m∫−11fwlm dt=0 by [F2]. By step 1.1, every polynomial q of degree at most d is a linear combination of Pm(m),…,Pm+d(m), so ∫−11gq dt=0 for every polynomial q.

3.1step 2.1F3F4F5algebra

[(b), density step] Polynomials are dense in L2((−1,1)): given φ∈L2 and ε>0, [F4] supplies a continuous h on [−1,1] with ∥φ−h∥2<ε/2, and apply [F3] separately to the real and imaginary parts of h, obtaining real polynomials p1,p2 whose respective uniform errors are below ε/(42), and put p=p1+ip2; then sup⁡[−1,1]∣h−p∣<ε/(22), so ∥h−p∥2<ε/2 by [F4] (applied to the interval length 2), whence ∥φ−p∥2<ε. Applying this to the complex-valued g componentwise (real and imaginary parts) gives polynomials qj with ∥g−qj∥2→0; since ∫gq=0 for all polynomials, Cauchy–Schwarz [F5] gives ∥g∥22=∫gg‾=lim⁡j∫gqj‾=0, so g=0 almost everywhere. On (−1,1) the factor (1−t2)m/2 is strictly positive, so f=g/(1−t2)m/2=0 almost everywhere.

4.1step 3.1F2F6algebra

[(b), completeness and expansion] By [F2] the family (wlm)l≥m is orthogonal with all norms nonzero, so (wlm/∥wlm∥2)l≥m is orthonormal; if a vector of L2 is orthogonal to the whole family, it is orthogonal to every wlm and vanishes by step 3.1, so the orthonormal family is complete in the sense of [F6]; the expansion, normalization and coefficient formulas follow from [F6].

5.1step 4.1F1F2F5algebra∎

[(c)] The orthogonal projection onto the span of a unit vector u is x↦⟨x,u⟩u, and for an unnormalized nonzero vector w it is x↦∥w∥2−2⟨x,w⟩w; with w=wmm and the inner product linear in the first argument this is the displayed formula. Indeed its value lies in the span of w, and its residual has zero inner product with w, uniquely determining the orthogonal projection; Cauchy–Schwarz bounds its norm by ∥x∥2. The explicit value of wmm follows from Pm(m)=(2m)!2mm! (the leading coefficient of Pm times m!) inserted into the definition of wlm.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources